Not exact matches
Given the latest medical data concerning the distinct characteristics of the fetus and its ability to
survive outside the womb at a startlingly early age, it is little wonder that in the past few years several of the denominations that once took a more open position on abortion have retreated somewhat: the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is now studying the issue; in a 1980 statement on social
principles, the UMC moved to a more qualified position; the Episcopal Church and the recently formed Evangelical Lutheran Church in America seem to be in the process of toning down their earlier positions (or those of a predecessor body) The Lutherans defeated a resolution in their 1989 Assembly which would have been consistent with the liberal position of the LCA predecessor body, and a 1988 Lutheran - Episcopal dialogue report refers to the fetus
as «embryonic humanity» with claims on society.
We should then expect either a condition of «no change» beyond simple elements,
surviving very nicely
as principles of intense energy, or else a riot of physical «mutations» having neither «survival value» nor any
principle of control by «survival value», a Universe in which so stable and inelastic a thing
as complex life could not
survive.
The
principle authors argue that this basic settlement
survived both the revisionism of Tony Crosland and the changes wrought by New Labour in the 1990s, contributing to the defeat of 2010, and the situation where Labour has alienated large swathes, not just of the middle class electorate, but of its traditional core working class vote
as well.
The basic premise of the book is seductive: in order to evolve and
survive as a species, while protecting the Earth, we have to reorganize and lead ourselves based on
principles that respect caring, nurturing, compassion, connectivity, peaceful coexistence, harmonization, adaptability, and rebalance (science with wisdom, awe and wonder).
If charters want to
survive on public money, they should adhere to the same
principles of inclusion of all children
as the public schools.
The special legal rules about sealed documents (deeds) largely
survive, often
as free - standing artefacts of the law rather than
as an expression of a legal
principle.
As such, the Court held that the respondent would be liable for the violation of the Technical Requirements, para 3.2.2.2 The Court concluded that, applying ordinary principles of contractual interpretation, the Technical Requirements are not too weak a basis on which to rest a contention that the respondent had a liability to warrant that the foundations would survive for twenty years or would be designed so as to achieve twenty years of lifetim
As such, the Court held that the respondent would be liable for the violation of the Technical Requirements, para 3.2.2.2 The Court concluded that, applying ordinary
principles of contractual interpretation, the Technical Requirements are not too weak a basis on which to rest a contention that the respondent had a liability to warrant that the foundations would
survive for twenty years or would be designed so
as to achieve twenty years of lifetim
as to achieve twenty years of lifetime.