I mean, imagine what would happen if there was a huge terror attack, and the government used it as an excuse to extend wire tapping efforts and
suspended habeas corpus and opened special prisons and such.
In the next breath,
he suspended habeas corpus for all persons so held under military authority.
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that the authority to
suspend habeas corpus lay exclusively with Congress.
This is because, as Milligan makes clear,
suspending habeas corpus in advance of an active rebellion that prevents the courts from functioning is unconstitutional anyway.
Not exact matches
Yet we find ourselves in the midst of a national debate, highlighted by Supreme Court arguments this week, over whether the Constitution means what it says by the words, «The Privilege of the Writ of
Habeas Corpus shall not be
suspended, except when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.»
And Congress quite explicitly has the Constitutional power to
suspend the writ of
habeas corpus, though whether this counts as a «suspension» of the writ is open for debate.
[A] s I understand it,
habeas is
suspended only with regard to non-citizens.
So, Congress could probably
suspend the writ of
habeas corpus if it felt that a particular coup was a rebellion.
So, there would be little benefit to be gained from
suspending the writ of
habeas corpus in order to allow the use of military tribunals rather than civilian courts to punish civilian participants in a coup.
A Civil War case addressed this separation of powers issue and held that the President may not
suspend the Writ of
Habeas corpus without the approval of Congress, but its status as valid precedent is contested:
The privilege of the Writ of
Habeas Corpus shall not be
suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
It was a test of the authority of the President to
suspend «the privilege of the writ of
habeas corpus» under the Constitution's Suspension Clause, when Congress was in recess and therefore unavailable to do so itself.
Is the belief that a coup is underway enough evidence to
suspend Posse Comitatus or
Habeas Corpus.
For example, we can consider how quarantine regulations would be utilized; the circumstances under which
habeas corpus might be
suspended; or the manner in which trans - national institutions, such as the United Nations, would react to a zombie apocalypse.
And we concur also in what is said of the writ of
habeas corpus and of its suspension, with two reservations: (1) that, in our judgment, when the writ is
suspended, the Executive is authorized to arrest, as well as to detain, and (2) that there are cases in which, the privilege of the writ being
suspended, trial and punishment by military commission, in states where civil courts are open, may be authorized by Congress, as well as arrest and detention.