We like to invest in upcoming areas that show solid,
sustainable GDP growth, job growth and population growth.
We need maximum
sustainable GDP growth for the world.
Following CCP National Congress, would be interested to hear Prof Pettis» further thoughts on
sustainable GDP growth.
Not exact matches
«The current
GDP growth pattern is not
sustainable,» said the letter.
The Washington Post editorial board takes it as an economic consensus view, stating that «debt - to -
GDP could keep rising — and stick dangerously near the 90 percent mark that economists regard as a threat to
sustainable economic
growth.»
Contrary to expectations that Beijing would finally embrace painful restructuring and financial deleveraging to reduce the risks of a financial crisis and make
growth sustainable, Li proclaimed that China would achieve
GDP growth of between 6.5 % and 7 % for 2016, similar to the 6.9 %
GDP growth the Chinese government reported in 2015.
Rebalancing means, remember, that household consumption
growth must outpace
GDP growth, and the only
sustainable way for this to happen is for household income
growth also to outpace
GDP growth.
In short, is the commitment to double 2010
GDP by 2020
sustainable as it requires
growth above 6 %?
More importantly, the government would still have a low and stable debt to
GDP ratio and be in an excellent position to implement a longer - term
sustainable economic
growth strategy.
According to this model, a small amount of deceleration in credit
growth can occur as additional credit efficiency is squeezed out of the system, but without a sharp decline in
GDP growth, substantial and
sustainable credit
growth deceleration can not occur except after a major transformation of China's
growth model, one condition of which is net wealth transfers from local governments to median households of at least one to two percentage points of
GDP annually.
If that's even slightly off, debt - to -
GDP could keep rising — and stick dangerously near the 90 percent mark that economists regard as a threat to
sustainable economic
growth.
«While the recent rebound in
GDP is encouraging, it is too early to conclude that the economy is on a
sustainable growth path,» the bank said in a news release that explained its interest rate decision.
Putting that aside I can see a longer term centuries scale scenario where falling population
growth and modeately falling consumption /
gdp growth rates intersect to for a
sustainable level, but still a decent level of technology and quality of life.
-- Muller believes humans are changing climate with CO2 emissions — humans have been responsible for «most» of a 0.4 C warming since 1957, almost none of the warming before then — IPCC is in trouble due to sloppy science, exaggerated predictions; chairman will have to resign — the «Climategate» mails were not «hacked» — they were «leaked» by an insider — due to «hide the decline» deception, Muller will not read any future papers by Michael Mann — there has been no increase in hurricanes or tornadoes due to global warming — automobiles are insignificant in overall picture — China is the major CO2 producer, considerably more than USA today — # 1 priority for China is
growth of economy — global warming is not considered important — China CO2 efficiency (
GDP per ton CO2) is around one - fourth of USA today, has much room for improvement — China
growth will make per capita CO2 emissions at same level as USA today by year 2040 — if it is «not profitable» it is «not
sustainable» — US energy future depends on shale gas for automobiles; hydrogen will not be a factor — nor will electric cars, due to high cost — Muller is upbeat on nuclear (this was recorded pre-Fukushima)-- there has been no warming in the USA — Muller was not convinced of Hansen's GISS temperature record; hopes BEST will provide a better record.