Sentences with phrase «sustained in a motor vehicle collision»

Injuries sustained in motor vehicle collisions can be deadly or severely debilitating just when dealing with passenger vehicles.

Interestingly, you should be aware that, pursuant to section 30 (5) of the Health Insurance Act, OHIP is not entitled to advance a subrogated claim for costs incurred or future costs related to injuries sustained in motor vehicle collisions.

Tuck v. Supreme Holdings Ltd. et al. 2014 NLTD (G) 131 Evidence — Limitation of Actions — Practice Summary: The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants on February 28, 2012, to recover damages allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle collision that occurred... [more]

There are many different kinds of injuries that vehicle occupants, cyclists, and pedestrians can sustain in motor vehicle collisions.

Reasons for judgement were released last month by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, assessing damages for injuries, including a symptomatic L5 / S1 disc herniation sustained in a motor vehicle collision.

A subarachnoid hemorrhage may be the result of a blow to the head or other violent impact, such as that sustained in a motor vehicle collision.

Not exact matches

If you sustained real injuries in a motor vehicle collision, whether or not that collision was low or high velocity, you have the right to claim compensation.

Individuals who are harmed in motor vehicle collisions may sustain physical and emotional pain, property damage, and financial strain due to medical bills and time away from work.

In a trial that lasted just over two days pursuant to Rule 66, Mr. Justice Wilson concluded that the Plaintiff sustained a soft tissue injury to her neck and shoulder as a result of the motor vehicle collision.

In order for there to be a viable tort action for damages or losses that were incurred as a result of a motor vehicle collision, the injured person must have sustained a permanent serious impairment of an important physical, mental or psychological function.

Given the legislative intention, it seems harsh and even punitive to not only deny a plaintiff, who has been found substantially not at fault in a motor vehicle collision and awarded damages for losses sustained, no - fault benefits but also to deduct the amount of his or her potential entitlement to Part 7 from the tort award.

Did you recently sustain injuries in a motor vehicle collision or in a pedestrian accident?