The fee award denial was
sustained on appeal.
That award was
sustained on appeal.
That order was
sustained on appeal.
State law says that if a denial of access to records is
sustained on appeal, an agency must «fully explain in writing... the reasons for further denial.»
Not exact matches
The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based
on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be
sustained upon examination, including the resolution of
appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The state government, in a communique issued here
on Wednesday, has made a fervent
appeal to farmers not to use oxytocin as its
sustained use may cause hormonal imbalance even in human beings and harm their reproductive system.
More than that, the
appeal was predicated
on a deep enough investment in the genre to
sustain both enthusiasm and cynicism.
Like just about every groundbreaking decision, this one includes dramatic language to make its point (and likely help
sustain the decision
on appeal).
Whether the issue is tracking Arctic methane or American stream flows, there's a vital need for
sustained, consistent observations, but — unfortunately — there's a two - edged bias against such investments, given the
appeal of focusing
on science's frontiers and the tendency to target monitoring programs — which are akin to bridge maintenance — when looking to cut budgets.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby
sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted
on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused
appealed —
Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries
sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby
sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted
on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused
appealed —
Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby
sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted
on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused
appealed against order to provide DNA sample —
Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was remote.
By combining s. 241's substance with the reversed onus of s. 192, the Court of
Appeal arrived at a conclusion that could not have been
sustained under either provision, read
on its own terms.
Supreme Court rules against doctor in cerebral palsy negligence case
On April 4, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada reversed a decision made by the British Columbia Court of
Appeal, levying $ 3.2 million in damages against a Chilliwack doctor for carelessness that led to a woman's baby
sustaining serious brain damage.
APPEAL from, and certiorari (309 U.S. 626) to review, a judgment which
sustained the conviction of all the defendants
on one count of an information and the conviction of one of the defendants
on another count.