Katko is considered a key
swing vote because Republicans can afford to lose only about 20 votes and still have the 218 votes needed for passage.
Not exact matches
Your average «
swing»
vote is as likely to laugh at any of them
because they typically find the whole process laugh worthy.
A majority in the Labour movement believe the party lost the election
because its traditional core supporters decided not to
vote Labour, not
because middle class
swing voters went to other parties.
Just
because the Tories might have secured a five percent
swing in a local election from their 2013
vote, that does not equate to being on course to secure a five percent
swing from 2015 for the corresponding House of Commons seat.
With FPTP, in a General Election a good local MP may lose their constituency
because of the national
swing against that MP's party, regardless of the personal merit and exemplary track record of the MP,
because people decide to
vote on a «party» basis.
The press as kingmaker!The Daily Mail
swung the 1924 election for the Tories by publishing the forged Zinoviev letter.The use by «The Telegraph» of purloined discs on MPs expenses was more damaging to Labour than the conservatives
because it discredited parliament, differential
voting did the rest.
I think Labour has to look at getting the
swing voting Tories back, the people at the bottom of the pile, the poorest the sick the disabled will not bother
voting because both parties are generally Conservatives, labour with a smaller c granted.
Failure to control for non-response will result in «phantom
swings» — polls bouncing
because of changes in sample composition despite no change in individual
voting intentions.
They may
vote with us again, and I would hope they do
because they could be in
swing districts that could make a difference in their election or in the primary.»
In a close count, both sides will have observers disputing the interpretation of particular ballots on a case - by - case basis,
because even a (literal) handful of
votes could
swing the result.
Conservative
swings in London in 2005 were larger than in just about any other part of the country — albeit mainly
because of large falls in the Labour
vote rather than increases in the Conservative
vote.
Ex labour, I'll defend you to Kevin berry who said that you're a Tory,
because you say labour is
swinging towards the left, I take it you're saying that as you don't want to happen, aTory would like labour to
swing towards the left as it'll put us out of power for years, but I'd hardly compare 43 m.p.s
voting against a piece of legislation including Nick Brown and Frank Field the equivalent of Hatton
The «late
swing» hypothesis is that the underestimation of the Conservative
vote occurred
because voters changed their minds right at the end of the campaign, after pollsters had finished contacting them.
You can be sure Greens feel attacked by progressives calling for Clinton
votes in
swing states
because they are campaigning against the Greens having ballot access in those states.
The reason it's so extreme is
because Martin's calculator is based upon a proportional
swing — i.e. the Lib Dems have lost 43 % of their
vote at the last election so their
vote in each seat is reduced by 43 %.
David Cameron believes we failed to win a majority
because we didn't reassure enough
swing voters (and not
because the core
vote was marginalised)
The reason the party did not win a majority, he said, was
because not enough people trusted the party with their
vote and that more reassurance needed to be given to
swing voters so that they could
vote Conservative with confidence and without fear.
Regarding labour losing
votes, many who went Ukip, didn't go there
because labour had
swung to the right.
Together, they make up a powerful «
swing»
vote because they are not necessarily tied to one major party or another.
Leahy is «trying to
swing from one end of the pendulum to the other, trying to see where he can get the
votes — and he hasn't found the sweet spot yet,» said one patent lobbyist, who would speak only on background
because of the sensitivity of the negotiations.