Either Mr Pickles or Lord Forsyth could get the Tories a landslide - we are doing well despite Mrs Spelman not because of her or because of Mr Letwin's confused platitudes that appeal to The Guardian editorial more than
swing voters in marginal seats.
The way our elections work encourages parties to ignore the views of the majority of the British public to focus on the handful of
swing voters in marginal seats.
The 1990s electoral tactic of announcing drastic future expenditure targets and forcing Labour to accept or reject them is designed for an electoral battleground for
the swing voters in the marginal seats in contention between Labour and the Conservatives, almost all of which are in England.
Not exact matches
Just one per cent of the electorate - less than half a million
voters in marginal swing seats - determined the outcome of the last general election.
Instead of mucking
in with the multifarious resistance movement - which, as you rightly state here, does not require universal agreement
in order to progress, that sort of Leninist thinking is weedkiller to the grassroots - Labour is already positioning itself for the next election, terrified of doing anything at all which might upset the few
swing voters in key
marginal seats that the party has repositioned itself towards over the past twenty years.
This would have the added benefit of lessening the importance of the million
voters in marginal, Middle England
seats, whose power to
swing elections has led Labour to pander excessively to their centre - right views.
However, it will be won or lost
in the 117
marginal seats we need to win
in order to gain an overall majority; and it will be won or lost on the decisions of
swing voters in those constituencies.