Not exact matches
Or past the fact that, hey, the
trolley has to run
on time, and we always flip this
switch that way at this time of day?
To sort out this conflicting picture, Cornelissen and his colleagues asked 84 undergraduates what they would do in a hypothetical dilemma where a runaway
trolley is
on a collision course with five people, and the only way to save them is to flip a
switch, reroute the
trolley and kill one person.
This was vividly brought home to me recently, reading the vast work of academic moral philosophy
On What Matters, by Derek Parfit, in which problems concerning the
switching of
trolleys from one rail to another in order to prevent or cause the deaths of those further down the line are presented as showing the essence of moral reasoning and its place in the life of human beings.
Sacked Liberal Democrat minister Jeremy Browne has compared his party to a «shopping
trolley that defaults to the left» in a parting attack
on the party's rank - and - file which has revived predictions of a
switch to the Tories.
Instead of pushing a cart, you can throw a
switch to divert the
trolley away from the five people, but it will kill one person standing
on another track.
For instance, take the classic dilemma, in which a runaway
trolley is about to kill five people unless you throw a
switch and divert it to another track, where it will kill just one (discussed by Peter Singer
on page 41).
Throwing a
switch for a
trolley,
on the other hand, is not the sort of thing our ancestors confronted.