He states: «Christianity's highest symbol is the crucifixion, and sacrifice which God brings for man, whereas the highest
symbol of faith in Judaism is the Akedah where all man's values are canceled and cast aside for reverence and love for God.»
Would you look the other way if the muslim community put
a symbol of their faith in the museum as well?
Not exact matches
In the aftermath of the referendum, Tsipras decided to present the head of his finance minister as a symbol that the Greek government was serious about negotiating in good fait
In the aftermath
of the referendum, Tsipras decided to present the head
of his finance minister as a
symbol that the Greek government was serious about negotiating
in good fait
in good
faith.
Do you think it appropriate to put the
symbol of one
faith above all other
in this place where people
of many
faiths were killed?
Imagine what the christian idiocy would do if they put up a
symbol of the Muslim
faith in the square.
Why not display other religious
symbols alongside this as a sign
of respect for the people
of other
faiths who also died
in the towers?
The two beams that were left at ground zero are now a
symbol of the christian
faith and therefore should not be used to honor everyone that died
in the attack.
It may be overstating a significant truth to notice that,
in part because
of the emphasis on
faith, the generations after the Reformation were devoted to the clarification
of the
faith and they left us the legacy
of great creeds and doctrinal
symbols.
A
faith that is uninformed or uninspired by the images, metaphors,
symbols, and stories
of God's Word is
in danger
of becoming unimaginative and unanchored, weakened by an overreliance on reason, adrift on a shallow sea
of facts and propositions.
This consists
in an ordering
of symbols and meanings that constitute the Christian
faith.
Following Kierkegaard's existential thesis that truth is «subjectivity,» Barth translated the eschatological
symbols of biblical
faith into
symbols reflecting a crisis
in human Existenz.
Christ became flesh to remain flesh, to become a living
symbol for the man
of radical
faith living
in the time
of the death
of God.
It is worth pointing out
in response that anyone who thinks Christians have never grappled with the problem
of evil can never have noticed that the crucifix is the central
symbol of Christian
faith.
Eschatological
faith is the expression
of an immediate participation
in the «Kingdom
of God» — an apocalyptic
symbol that was never assimilated by Christian theology.
Finally, I would suggest that though one can't do everything
in a single book, at a certain point the global ethic project must engage more fully and critically the various
symbols and tenets
of the great
faiths.
Medieval art as well dealt
in symbols in an era when artists were more concerned with the world
of Christian
faith than with the world
of scientific observation.
To put it another way,
in living out
of the inherited
symbols and narratives
of one's
faith, one isn't just applying dead truths to a living situation.
In terms
of the current use
of language, this means that they remain metaphysical, refusing to think
of «God» as only a
symbol of the community's
faith.
If people
of faith want to see value
in the
symbol, let them.
If a non-believer has no
faith, then what is the argument for removing religious
symbols of other religious practices
in the first place?
For the Christian community, the cross is the supreme
symbol, for
in his self - sacrifice Christ pointed beyond himself and surrendered the particular to the ultimate; the cross was the manifestation
of God's participation
in man's existence, universally present but not universally recognized.31 Tillich's own background
in the Lutheran Church and his sensitivity to Luther's experience
of guilt, forgiveness, personal
faith and divine grace, are reflected at many points
in his writings, especially
in his sermons.32
Well, I'm someone, and I would like this piece
of the structure — which «just happens» to be the
symbol of my
faith and more importantly the
symbol of the
faith of so many 9/11 victims and their families — to be included
in the exhibit as a matter
of respect to those victims and victims» families to whom it is meaningful.
This particular group is wrong about the cross, it should be displayed, along with the Star
of David, the Crescent and Star, and whatever other
symbols of faith the loved ones
of those who died that day chose to believe
in.
Faith,
in the end, rests not on the authority
of a pristine set
of signs but on a community that offers
in its
symbols a distinctive identity, an overarching story, a collective self - image.
Whether the family is nuclear or extended, a twosome or a tribe, its propensities for reverence and ritual often express a religious process that relates home - grown myths, honors domestic
symbols, and follows devotional sequences that intensify
faith in that family and allegiance to its own images
of ultimacy.
Reinhold Niebuhr wrote
in 1939, «The idea
of the resurrection
of the body is a Biblical
symbol in which modern minds find the greatest offence and which has long since been displaced
in most modern versions
of the Christian
faith by the idea
of the immortality
of the soul.61
For all we could possibly know, all our psychical concepts apply to God not as analogies, but as
symbols,
in exactly the same way
in which at least some
of them clearly must apply if we are to do any justice at all to the
faith and witness
of theistic religion.
«Toward New
Symbols» expands on a call to resymbolize the message
of faith in God which he had issued
in a CHRISTIAN CENTURY article, «Reformation: Continuing Imperative.»
We do not miss the loyalty
of David's mercenary troops (15: 19 - 21); the narrator's conviction
of the mature quality
of David's
faith (15:25 f.; 16:12); the essential gentleness
of David
in these most wretched hours (16:5 - 14); the brilliant, carnal
symbol of Absalom's irrevocable usurpation (16:20 - 22) and its portentous recall
of the David - Nathan encounter (II 12:11 - 12); the arch Old Testament realist, the remarkable pragmatist Ahitophel (17: 1 - 23); Joab, who always acts like Joab (18:10 - 15; 19:1 - 7; 20A - 13); David's pathetic concern, implicit throughout, for the defiant son (18:1 - 5); the moving grief
of a father's utter brokenness
in the loss
of his son (18:33); the reassertion
in this critical time
of the old and always fundamental north - south cleavage (19:11,41 - 43); David's profound and probably chronic annoyance with the crude, brash, «muscular» ways
of Joab and his brothers, the sons
of Zeruiah (16:10; 19:22; see also 3:34 b; 3:38 f.); and finally,
in a kind
of pausal summary before the last scene
of David's reign
in I Kings 1 - 2, the statement
of David's very modest bureaucracy (20:23 - 26; cf. the extensive elaboration
of this structure under Solomon, I Kings 4:1 ff.).
The death
of Jesus is portrayed
in Christian
faith and hope as an act
of life, as an affirmation
of life
in the face
of death, and the cross
of Jesus are
symbols not
of death, but
of an unquenchable and invincible life that this world can neither give nor take away from us.
On the one hand, this all too modern
symbol of Yes - saying unveils the impotent passivity and the inhuman detachment
of Christian
faith in God,
of Christian dependence upon and submission to God, the demonic consequences
of which are so passionately portrayed
in Ivan Karamazov.
There sat before me a student who,
in his own experience
of an eroded Christian ethos and understanding and
in his equally certain longing to find a
faith with a magnitude equal to his problems, was a living
symbol of millions
in our generation to whom the gospel must be preached.
However, offering slang and fashionable jargon as «renewed» preaching, celebrating the secular embrace
of certain Christian
symbols (i.e., use
of crosses as warnings at highway danger points, putting Christ
in Christmas, etc.), or reducing the Gospel to the lowest common denominator
of acceptable
faith and ethic will hardly be received by a serious world as adequate penance.
These data from the life
of the
Faith congregation, rich
in the people's
symbols and values, assure Landry
of sermon materials that consistently hit home with his hearers.
That this is so is but another illustration
of the extent to which the
faith of the church has been confounded with the belief
in the ideas, wishes and sentiments
of men, and to which the word God has been made the
symbol, not
of the last reality with which man contends, but
of his own aspirations.
They are thus true
symbols of the meaning
of Christ
in the life and
faith of the church; and, because they are the
symbols historically developed to express that meaning, they can never be replaced.
Almost every department
of theological study is involved at this level, and this means not only attention to the
symbols and images
of the Christian
faith; it also means attention to the
symbols and images and art forms
of the contemporary world, as they are encountered
in literature and the fine arts, but also
in popular expressions, community rituals, social ideologies, and not least
in the mass media
of the time.
For those wonderfully naïve little girls, Santa Claus was a
symbol not
of the commercial debasement
of Christmas but
of the real meaning
of their
faith in punishment and reward.
As St. Francis stands with the
symbols of death and self - sacrifice
in his hands, so stands every life
of faith.
Inculturation should not be understood merely as intellectual research; it occurs when Christians express their
faith in the
symbols and images
of their respective culture.
Nor do such
symbols play a peripheral role
in eschatological
faith; they are rather at its center, even if that center was lost
in the established form
of the Christian tradition and
in its nondialectical theologies.
For example, he grants without difficulty that the language
of faith can take up myth again
in the form
of symbol or image.
Avoiding superficiality which skims the surface without dirtying oneself, a fresh look at these questions demands
of us a
faith commitment to the source
of renewal, to that lonely and betrayed person, whose own baptism
in the river Jordan, was a
symbol of his commitment to being a part
of messy human existence.
Thus,
in some
of his early essays, Ricoeur is already giving this philosophical hope a hermeneutical turn, referring to it as «the Last Day,» which,
in its original context
in the Hebrew Scriptures, is a
symbol of the hope
of the community
of faith for fulfilled righteousness and justice.
If you don't like the Cross and other Christian
symbols of faith, you could go to some other country near the hell's doors... it's only your choice, because the majority
of italian people believes
in Jesus and his Holy Cross, and also many Russian people incredibly after statal atheism need Christian religion.
In a world where there are agnostics, athesists, satanists, catholics, muslims,... ad nauseum... then to take each of their monies in the form of taxes and then only display one of those religious symbol in a place where all children of all faiths are educated is a slap to face of any fair minded individua
In a world where there are agnostics, athesists, satanists, catholics, muslims,... ad nauseum... then to take each
of their monies
in the form of taxes and then only display one of those religious symbol in a place where all children of all faiths are educated is a slap to face of any fair minded individua
in the form
of taxes and then only display one
of those religious
symbol in a place where all children of all faiths are educated is a slap to face of any fair minded individua
in a place where all children
of all
faiths are educated is a slap to face
of any fair minded individual.
Easter
faith as the
symbol of hope offends no one, but Easter
faith as belief
in an empty tomb and
in Jesus» bodily resurrection is quite another matter.
If you want live
in Arab countries you have to accept many crescents minarets and other
symbol of their
faith.
OLFRANK: is that why minarates are being banned
in most of Europe??? So you want to protect your faith and its symbols but don't mind other symbols being banned??? In actuality its even worse, a minarate is not a symbol that is hung in a class room but its actually part of a mosque, so imagine a whole continent (Europe) saying no more bells attached to any churches!
in most
of Europe??? So you want to protect your
faith and its
symbols but don't mind other
symbols being banned???
In actuality its even worse, a minarate is not a symbol that is hung in a class room but its actually part of a mosque, so imagine a whole continent (Europe) saying no more bells attached to any churches!
In actuality its even worse, a minarate is not a
symbol that is hung
in a class room but its actually part of a mosque, so imagine a whole continent (Europe) saying no more bells attached to any churches!
in a class room but its actually part
of a mosque, so imagine a whole continent (Europe) saying no more bells attached to any churches!!!
In the Orient, a fully dialectical form
of faith, such as Madhyamika Buddhism, has inevitably dissolved all positive meaning, with the result that it has left behind the world
of symbols, myths and dogmas.