Sentences with phrase «synoptic gospels»

All three synoptic gospels contain this incident from the public ministry of Our Lord, but each with a slightly different emphasis.

You do understand that Like the other synoptic gospels, the Gospel of Luke is anonymous, wrtten 200 years after the event by Greek scribes (Papyrus 4).

I don't know how synoptic gospels vs. John fits here.

Furthermore, there are contradictions in the New Testament synoptic gospels and between the epistles and acts.

Much of this material parallels material already to be found in the canonical synoptic gospels, while other parallels material already known to us from extra-canonical sources, especially the Oxyrhynchus papyrus sayings, 36.

The Lucan text is addressed to a more cultivated public than the other synoptic gospels; the Johannine Gospel, too, is a highly intellectual text, combining the spiritual, symbolic, and factual.

The synoptic gospels spend a lot of time on the passion narrative.

Here's one very basic fact you need to keep in mind: If you accept the Synoptic gospels» assertion that this all happened at Passover, then you MUST immediately know that the entire account is fiction.

The teachings of Jesus in John are distinct from those found in the synoptic gospels.

While the first three are found in all the synoptic gospels, the last one is found only in Mark.

The synoptic gospels all agree that Jesus» message was that the basileia theou was drawing near.

When we read the synoptic gospels, we are struck by the fact that Jesus was always followed by large crowds of people.

In the synoptic gospels, Jesus did not wish his divine status to be openly proclaimed.

Apart from the Passion narrative, the various incidents recorded in the synoptic gospels are only loosely connected and probably the links have been supplied by the evangelists.

The canon closed at the latest 60 years after when John the Elder wrote down what John the Disciple wanted added to the synoptic gospels.

Some scholars have perceived commonalities in the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) that with this corroboration between the three would suggest greater authenticity.

The Synoptic gospels also emphasized Jesus» obedience in their account of his agony in the Garden of Gethsemane, when Jesus prayed «Abba Father, everything is possible for you.

At the end of the preceding lecture I provided an account of what I understand, from the synoptic gospels, serious following of Jesus entails.

Augustine was one of the first to discuss the likely relationship between the three synoptic gospels... I am all for questioning, but I find it interesting that this was not questioned as such until this time.

Prior to the time of the early church father Augustine, there is little evidence of discussion on the relationship of the synoptic gospels... and on side note of text book p. 47..

As in some parts of the synoptic gospels, a good many of the sayings seem to be linked by verbal association rather than by similarity of subject matter.

Sometimes Thomas separates sayings which in the synoptic gospels were combined.

If it can be shown that Thomas made use of the synoptic gospels in their present form it becomes fairly likely that he also employed apocryphal gospels in written form.

In the synoptic gospels this parable is concluded with a mention of the cornerstone which the builders rejected (Mark 12:10 and parallels).

It is a question whether Thomas derived his synoptic - type sayings from the synoptic gospels as written documents or from oral traditions also used by the synoptic evangelists.

Another way in which Thomas uses the synoptic tradition or, more probably, the synoptic gospels is by adding materials which make sayings of Jesus look more «Semitic» because of their parallelism.

■ The synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) indicate that Jesus died before nightfall on the 15th day of Nisan; right before the start of the Passover meal.

There are harmless questions, like can I be excused, or how can I help, or what's a good book about the synoptic gospels, or can you please explain this passage.

scholars have no idea who even wrote the synoptic gospels.

I say this because I am a Pauline Christian who reads the Bible Christocentrically and understands Christ in light of the Jesus of the synoptic gospels.

This fundamental solution of the relationship of the Synoptic gospels, as the first three gospels are called because of their common view of the life of Jesus (Gr.

then there is little to keep us from affirming that he could have easily said it of himself, even though this kind of self - description is rare in the synoptic gospels.

The synoptic gospels offer nothing of Socratic composure.

The synoptic gospels record at this point the Lord's Supper; John has chosen another way to make his point.

It is not merely a future superhistorical event, as in the synoptic gospels.

According to the synoptic gospels, people in his day, marveling at his words and deeds, called him «Lord.»

«Jesus» had come to name not only the human figure about whom we read in the synoptic gospels but also a divine being who temporarily inhabited a human body and in that role died on a cross for our sake.

He contrasts John with the synoptic gospels, where the religious establishment appears as Jesus» main enemy, whereas in John «the enemies are for the most part «the Jews.

Even if the synoptic gospels appear to do so, that is only when they are read in the light of the historical problems which have arisen since their day, not when they are read in their original sense.

We meet it again in all the recent commentaries on the synoptic gospels, and also in Martin Dibelius's Jesus (1939).

Interpreted in this way the death of Jesus is very much the continuation of the life of Jesus that was portrayed in both the Synoptic gospels and in John.