Sentences with phrase «system attacking what»

The signs you see in the effusive form of FIP are believed to be the result of your cat's immune system attacking what it perceives as a threat from foreign invader.

Not exact matches

When Hawaii's ballistic - missile - threat system blared an alert across the state on January 13, many people didn't know where to go, what to do, or whether they could even survive a nuclear attack.
«The worry was, What if there was an attack from inside the system, with someone tampering with the data?»
Once you know what possible symptoms of cyber zombie attacks on your system may look like, it is essential to perform routine security checks.
I don't know what system was in place in 2006, but I do know that the phone applications now used to warn people of possible rocket attacks are a new innovation in the civilian early - warning system.
Risk managers in the financial services industry are skittish about what they perceive as a heightened chance for high - impact event hitting the global financial system hard and they're naming potential cyber attacks as one of the biggest drivers for that increased risk.
The drug has an unfortunate side effect of tricking the immune system into attacking healthy cells, but the relative damage was insignificant compared to what cancer would have done to them.
No CB would solve our problems.People seem to think the signing of Van Dijk will solve our problems.I'll be back here to remind us next season that we need another defender.The system, combinations and mentality is what is wrong with Arsenal.I can see it being overlooked this season too.All we needed this season was a striker, a midfielder who's a defensive and attacking hybrid and possibly one luxury signing.
What Wenger has done is create careers for players dumped by the big clubs, players who he bought into the system to be home grown, and the others that might suit the team's attacking style that has given it a global following.
Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off
and thier injuries need to be manage better maybe less playing time for some than others, unfortunately wenger cant afford to give them the proper time of his coaching, as he is under massive pressure to succeed these days and hasn't got time to train them up properly, also he isn't tactically flexible enough to accommodate them into different attacking systems, to test what they can do like having the ox in a 3 man midfield could work wonders.
What is killing our game more is our predictability 4:4:1 system — the use of one striker is the one killing our once beautiful attacking game.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Both Gerrard and Lampard commanded places without really fitting a system that could work, or indeed without being used as they were so successfully for their clubs; what England have now in their Carrick - Henderson - Delph midfield three is a far more solid, less flashy combination to allow the attacking players like Raheem Sterling, Danny Welbeck and Wayne Rooney (as it was against Lithuania) to do the rest.
Arsenal do not have a CDM really offers much of a defensive presence to block anything on the event there is a counter attack, what is even worse is that a 4 1 4 1 is a system that demands that EVEN more than a 4 2 3 1 because if the front 5 are broken through it leaves the entire back 5 open to swift and merciless counter attack.
Sterling has almost exclusively lined up in an attacking left - wing role for his new club in what has more often than not been a 4 -2-3-1 system.
Even thou, I still have something to criticise; We actually had 2 CDM today.To me Song has been put there to take up that job, but I saw Deni doing it more on his behalf and not only that but Deni did it far better than him.Back early this season, Deni has been heavily criticised on his Defensiv performance and now I see him better on his defence than his attack, I think its time for him now to combine the two sides, because if he just made some gud runs today, for attack assistance (Like Sagna or like what Flamini used to do the old days), then our attackin system was totaly perfect at 100 %.
I have tried so many things and do many of the things you do to calm my nervous system (i.e. meditate, yoga, breath work...), but what I found most helpful in terms of easing an anxiety attack is to use grounding techniques, like moving awareness to my feet or anywhere in my body that feels calm, even if it's just a toe — and then adding self soothing talk of «I'm safe» or anything positive for that matter.
Early healthy gut flora seems to be key in teaching an infants immune system what to attack and what to allow, meaning that autoimmunity is learned early.
New York was one of seven states earlier this week whose student tests were hit by what was reportedly a «deliberate attack» on the computer system operated by Questar, an outside vendor.
Cuomo also jumped on that and Sanders» platform in which he attacks what he calls a corrupt political funding system and Clinton's reliance on substantial funding from Wall Street and corporate America.
«What was witnessed in the vile video... is a humiliating and insulting attack on the more than 50 years of progress that this nation has made since the Civil Rights movement,» Espaillat and Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. wrote to the New York court system's attorney grievance committee.
# 2 million by saying it is an attack on ordinary middle class owners, you wonder what part of the solar system they live in.
That hyper - response, Miller theorizes, is not unlike what's seen in autoimmune diseases, where the inflammation provoked by an immune system attack proves far more damaging than any pathogen itself.
Old's insights suggested that Coley's toxin worked because it tricked the body into releasing a flood of cytokines by exposing the immune system to what seemed like an enormous bacterial attack.
«We live inside modern systems that are both physical and computational, and, in such a smart living environment, attacks can come from multiple different sources, some even inside what we consider protected.»
Dr. Siqueira said she and her colleagues are now investigating whether the problem was the result of an auto - immune disorder sparked by one of the viruses that caused the immune system to attack nerve cells, similar to what occurs in Zika patients who develop Guillain - Barré Syndrome.
What is clearly evident in the Swedish health care registers is the fact that those who lack a thymus have an increased incidence of autoimmune diseases in which the immune system attacks the body's own tissue; Type 1 diabetes; thyroid disease; rheumatic disease; and hypersensitivity to gluten.
What's more, the drug also increased the immune system's «memory» cells so that they could attack the tumor if it ever reared its head again.
It's not known what triggers the immune system to attack the embryonic stem cells, but the scientists believe it may be a protein that begins to appear on the surface of the cells as they differentiate into more - specialized tissues.
To prevent or reduce the damage done to nerve cells by the immune system, researchers are exploring ways to modulate what cells the immune system attacks or the intensity of its attack.
The role of these good bacteria is to train the baby's human cells to distinguish between what is «friend» and what is «foe» so that its immune system can fight off attack from pathogens.
What causes symptoms is the build up of damage to cells, tissues and / or organs in the body — damage caused by your own immune system attacking those cells.
That being said, if it's too sensitive, your immune system can overreact, producing antibodies to attack what it perceives as a «dangerous» substance, even if it's just a fragrant flower.
• How oral health could be silently sabotaging your wellness • Why high - dose vitamin C is essential for neutralizing toxins attacking your systemWhat changes you can make in your tech - laden environment to improve your health
And what we know can happen if someone, for example, has had food poisoning, after food poisoning, when your immune system comes into attack whatever bacteria or parasite is causing the food poisoning, your immune system can accidentally attack these interstitial cells of cajal, and that may be exactly what's happening when we see this impaired motility that causes all these problems of bloating, and distention, and just funky digestion in general.
I believe what happens is antibodies against food happen to be shaped so that they also bind to bodily tissues, launching a painful or disabling immune attack against your joints, your digestive system, or even your nervous system.
The seat of > 70 % of our immune system and our most vulnerable interface with our environment, the gut is a powerful site of communication about what is «ok» and what needs to be attacked.
When the immune system identifies these errant proteins as invaders, it does what it does in response to any other invading pathogen: mount an attack and fortify the body's defenses by releasing histamine (which tries to get rid of the «pathogen» by inducing diarrhea, sneezing, runny nose, watery eyes, and all the other symptoms you might get from an allergic or intolerance reaction).
What this means is that the bacteria in our digestive system can influence our body's systems on whether they should launch an immune attack.
What ends up happening is IgG cells from our adaptive immune system are called in to attack.
Doctors don't know what causes your immune system to attack your thyroid gland.
There's relaxation things like heart rate variability training, like the energy medicine that you've done, like reducing stress from craniosacral things, getting more sleep and so what you found is you found that you manage your stress levels and if the stress gets out of hand, the immune system starts to attack itself.
This long - standing inflammation is ultimately what «confuses» the immune system and promotes the attack on healthy tissues.
Thus, if you have intestinal permeability depending on what larger particles get through, your immune system can start attacking literally any items that you commonly eat like tomatoes, garlic, cucumbers, even a lean piece of grass - fed steak.
Microflora is what communicates with the immune system, initiating an attack on «bad» influences which may enter our system.
With continued body inflammation response, your immune system senses danger and starts attacking what it thinks are invading germs.
Although it is unknown what causes the immune system to attack healthy cells, most autoimmune diseases are triggered by poor diet, environmental pollution, stress, and trauma...
No one knows what causes multiple sclerosis, in which the body's immune system attacks the protective myelin sheath surrounding nerve fibers in the brain and spine.
Which organ, gland, tissue, or chemical the immune system attacks depends on different factors, such as genetic predisposition and what triggered the autoimmunity.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z