Eventually
the system equilibrates, but with a slower rate of circulation of Cub fans through the El and to their homes.
Not exact matches
The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively
equilibrated to the atmospheric
system.
The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively
equilibrated to the atmospheric
system.
However, a lot is not: instead it contributes to the overall warming of the deep ocean that has to occur for the climate
system to
equilibrate.
Their reconstructed CO2 concentrations for the past five million years was used to estimate Earth -
system climate sensitivity for a fully
equilibrated state of the planet, and found that a relatively small rise in CO2 levels was associated with substantial global warming 4.5 million years ago.
Heat flow stops when they
equilibrate in T (z) everywhere &
system is isentropic.
That is exactly the same 290 μatm which one would measure for a static
system like a flask in a laboratory at the same temperature given sufficient time to
equilibrate with the air above the liquid.
First of all, if one waits for the temperature response to
equilibrate the
system, the imbalance will go to zero and your diagnosed sensitivity will be infinite.
Let the ice age warm up and let things
equilibrate and the
system eventually returns to its «default» equilibrium temperature.
«The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively
equilibrated to the atmospheric
system.
On the other hand, if we imagine a case where the planet actually
equilibrates at some warmer temperature, then there would be an energy difference proportional to the difference in global temperature — and that difference would be quasi-permanent, in line with the notion that energy was «trapped» in the
system.
«[The greenhouse theory] essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively
equilibrated to the atmospheric
system.
Problem # 2: Was the climate
system in a sufficiently
equilibrated state during the LGM (or in any prior glacial or interglacial period) to define the four - dimensional equilibrium manifold uniquely?
No energy is created (apart from the input of 524W / m ^ 2) in this, the
system is just
equilibrating to a new temperature to balance input with the limited output availiable due to the reflective blanket.
«The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of the tendency that over time, differences in temperature, pressure, and chemical potential
equilibrate in an isolated physical
system.