There are not many options for how an excess of iron - 60 — which later decayed into nickel - 60 — could have gotten into a primitive Solar
System object in the first place — one of them being a supernova.
Not exact matches
In an imaging
system, the entire picture or document is treated as one whole
object.
The two nuclear - powered probes launched 40 years ago and became the first and only robots to take close - up photographs of Uranus and Neptune, the planets» moons and rings, and other
objects in the outer solar
system.
Normally many of the
object - oriented programming languages clean up for you because they notice when you are running low on memory and haven't used a bit of code
in a while, but
in the case of these terascale
systems, it would be like having a kitchen the size of a football field, so by the time you ran out of room, it would take weeks to clean it up.
In amongst the swirling mass of stars at its heart lie many intriguing
systems, including X-ray sources, variable stars, vampire stars, unexpectedly bright «normal» stars known as blue stragglers, and tiny
objects known as millisecond pulsars, small dead stars that rotate astonishingly quickly.
«We also found that it had a reddish color, similar to
objects in the outer Solar
System, and confirmed that it is completely inert, without the faintest hint of dust around it.»
People
object to a
system that they see as being dominated by big pharma, a
system that intrusively asserts control over our lives, telling us what's wrong with us, and telling us what we must do
in order to get better (as they choose to define «better»).
«We use high - performance transactions
systems, complex rendering and
object caching, workflow and queuing
systems, business intelligence and data analytics, machine learning and pattern recognition, neural networks and probabilistic decision making, and a wide variety of other techniques,» founder and CEO Jeff Bezos famously noted
in a 2010 letter to shareholders.
At its closest approach to Jupiter during each flyby, the robot briefly becomes the fastest human - made
object in the solar
system, reaching speeds of about 130,000 mph.
AN electronic
system for automatic and accurate measurement of volumes of solid
objects could become a weapon
in the fight against breast cancer.
Ideally, Fennell said, federal regulators would have required not only backup cameras but also emergency braking and alert
systems that automatically stop a vehicle when sensors detect
objects or people
in a rear blind spot.
«The radars they use are apparently meant for detecting moving
objects (as typically used
in adaptive cruise control
systems), and seem to be not very good
in detecting stationary
objects,» he says.
But
in this case, the
system uses a combination of prior maps as well as the lidar, which sends out a signal and gathers data on the range and intensity of
objects in its path and around it
in order to determine where the vehicle is driving
in real time.
So if the big bang happened, then several
objects in our solar
system are rotating
in the wrong direction and thus violating these laws.
A range
in relation to an optical
system, such as a camera lens, representing distances great enough that light rays reflected from
objects within the range may be regarded as parallel.
Hitler, for a time, advocated for Germans a form of the Christian faith he called «Positive Christianity», [244][245] a belief
system purged of what he
objected to
in orthodox Christianity, and featuring added racist elements.
While Tillich provides a
system to overcome the subject -
object dilemma of Cartesianism, he denies that Being - itself is actually increased or decreased by events, i.e., it is not
in process, and, therefore, does not share
in human adventures.5 Camus» position implies that if there is a God, such a God would be tolerable only if God is involved
in the struggle of man's existence.
To pick out just three: that which Deleuze theorizes as «the virtual» bears a certain similarity to Whiteheadian pure potentiality; likewise, the elements of the virtual, namely, what Deleuze calls «Ideas,» play a role comparable to that attributed to eternal
objects; finally, the factor
in the Deleuzean
system which corresponds most closely to Whitehead's notion of creativity — that ultimate principle by which the production of novelty is to be thought — goes, for Deleuze, under the name of «productive difference,» or «Difference
in itself?»
On this third option the presence of God is not
in the king nor is it
in the design of the
system, but it remains
in the people and the
objects of creation.
And as the Kneales have it, «when «space» and words of similar origin occur
in pure mathematics, they refer to abstract patterns of ordering which may conceivably be exemplified by widely differing
systems of
objects» (DL 386).
First, Whitehead's
system provides a comprehensive unity to overcome the subject -
object dualism that prohibits Camus from «defining» a value that is grounded
in nature.
Because the path it [the dark precursor] follows is invisible and becomes visible only
in reverse, to the extent that it is traveled over and covered by the phenomena it induces within the
system [i.e., within an actual world], it has no place other than that from which it is «missing,» no identity other than that which it lacks: it is precisely the
object = x.» (D&R 119 - 120)
By the «ontological principle,» the
system of eternal
objects, or possibles, must be grounded
in some actual existent,
in this case God's mental pole, or God's primordial nature.
I can therefore see an
object in so far as
objects form a
system or a world, and
in so far as each one treats the others round it as spectators of its hidden aspects which guarantee the permanence of those aspects by their presence.
This would mean, for instance, that participants
in an economic transaction are bound to halt their activity whenever any one of them or any affected individual
objects to it, or a criminal court judge is bound to halt the trial's proceedings if the accused dissents from a specific rule of the judicial
system.
The frequent presence of a «value vacuum» (Frankl)
in the personality and relationship problems brought to counselors emphasizes Erich Fromm's conviction that every human being needs a «
system of thought and action shared by a group which gives the individual a frame of orientation and an
object of devotion.»
He does not argue, but merely asserts that the relational essence of an eternal
object A refers to «a set of extensive relations which give it [A] a status
in this abstract
system» and «to logico - mathematical relationships» akin to eternal
objects of the objective species
in Process and Reality (PW 77/79).
Triangles, mathematical relations, logical
systems, groups, rings, spaces, etc. are all eternal
objects or can be viewed as eternal
objects through their ordinary expression
in mathematical or logical symbolism.
The conclusion I want to pull out of these considerations is this: if there is at least one actual entity
in the world characterized by at least one eternal
object, one specific form of definiteness, then this actual entity provides all the ontological ground required for the realm of eternal
objects — an appeal to God is not necessary.11 And, indeed,
in Whitehead, as
in Aristotle, there is an eternity and an abeternity of becoming so that within the terms of the
system it is inconceivable that there be any region of the extensive continuum, no matter how far it be extended fore or aft, where there is not a generation of actual entities exhibiting concrete forms of definiteness.
In this final section I will suggest in a tentative manner how the two remaining roles of God (as ontological ground for eternal objects and as source of subjective aims in temporal occasions) could be rendered superfluous in a naturalistic, neo-Whiteheadian, syste
In this final section I will suggest
in a tentative manner how the two remaining roles of God (as ontological ground for eternal objects and as source of subjective aims in temporal occasions) could be rendered superfluous in a naturalistic, neo-Whiteheadian, syste
in a tentative manner how the two remaining roles of God (as ontological ground for eternal
objects and as source of subjective aims
in temporal occasions) could be rendered superfluous in a naturalistic, neo-Whiteheadian, syste
in temporal occasions) could be rendered superfluous
in a naturalistic, neo-Whiteheadian, syste
in a naturalistic, neo-Whiteheadian,
system.
Then what of the realm of eternal
objects in Whitehead's
system?
since the Sun is the biggest
object in our solar
system, it makes sense that it would have the strongest gravitational pull, just as it makes sense that we weigh less / have less gravity on the moon since it is not as large or as dense as the Earth.
In Whitehead's
system a physical feeling is the perception of a past event as distinguished from a «conceptual feeling» which is the entertainment of an eternal
object.
Furthermore, the exigencies of his
system required him to conceive of the initial aim
in terms of single definite form: the «aim determines the initial gradations of relevance of eternal
objects for conceptual feeling and constitutes the autonomous subject
in its primary phase...» (PR 244).
Loyalty to the nation - state has been a principal
object of the communications and educational
systems of the family and of the national community for a few hundred years — a relatively short period
in man's history.
Unless we can get out of the new
system motherhood as consecrated, spiritual quality as fine, idealism as exalted, religious faith as cleansing and ennobling as distinguished previous generations, the new
system will have failed
in its most important
object.
The mass attributed to ordinary
objects is required as an independent parameter
in predicting the motions that result from the interactions among a
system of physical
objects.
In these
systems, God is no longer the
object of faith — faith is the
object of faith.
Specific notions of deity, and of divine action, that have figured
in theistic conceptual systems of long - past civilizations have certainly been influenced by then - prevailing technology — the ways in which people made their living.5 In our own time, recent developments in technology and in science have had major influence on how the object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrot
in theistic conceptual
systems of long - past civilizations have certainly been influenced by then - prevailing technology — the ways
in which people made their living.5 In our own time, recent developments in technology and in science have had major influence on how the object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrot
in which people made their living.5
In our own time, recent developments in technology and in science have had major influence on how the object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrot
In our own time, recent developments
in technology and in science have had major influence on how the object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrot
in technology and
in science have had major influence on how the object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrot
in science have had major influence on how the
object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrote:
Obviously you don't realize that an asteriod the size of just the Empire State Building that actually makes it to the surface of the earth at the average speed of most
objects coming from the asteroid belt
in our solar
system would cause enough destruction and devastation on earth to wipe out most if not all of the planet.
Thus, just as
in Whitehead's categoreal
system the two first - mentioned elements, absolute concreteness and unique occurrence, are united
in the concept of a determinate, fundamental, categoreal existence (the concept of an occasion or actual entity), so the corresponding counter-elements, absolute abstractness and the character of abiding existence [lmmer - Gewesen - Sein], are joined together
in another concept of an opposite categoreal type, that of an utterly abstract entity, which always was and always is, which Whitehead calls an eternal
object.
As Whitehead allowed cognition to be grounded
in real prehensions, which occur between a subject and its
object world, so also it was for Piaget: the «epistemic» subject, as an organism, previously an «open
system» which simply lives
in interaction with its environment, acts — and finally, thinks (BC 477).
The attempt is to explain the way
in which God is related to actual occasions, eternal
objects, and creativity,
in such a way that at no point do we attribute to him a mode of being or relation inexplicable
in terms of the principles operative elsewhere
in the
system.
To the extent that the four ultimate elements of his
system (actual occasions, God, eternal
objects, and creativity) are arbitrarily disconnected, to that extent some measure of incoherence remains
in Whitehead's own philosophy.
Now, given any
system of material
objects that might be considered as a frame of reference
in a theory of dynamics, that
system is either at rest, or
in motion with uniform velocity, or
in accelerated motion relative to absolute space.
Kraus says that eternal
objects «form the patterns structuring concrete fact» and «the forms structuring the togetherness of data into a datum of experience — eternal
objects in Whitehead's language — are given for all times
in ordered, intelligible, interrelated sets like mathematical
systems» (ME 30).
The reason why Whitehead believes that it must be independent is that only if it is a
system of relations independent of the changing, variable, physical characters of material
objects can it serve as a frame of reference
in terms of which the self - congruence of material
objects under transport — which makes them suitable as measuring standards — can be determined.
Any
system of material
objects in accelerated motion relative to absolute space manifests forces — the «inertial forces» — that vary
in accordance with the degree of acceleration; the centrifugal force discussed above is an example.
Neither Newton nor Whitehead ascribes to a purely relative theory of space and time structure, that is, a theory which would maintain that any selected
system of material
objects may serve as a suitable framework
in terms of which to analyze physical reality.
Rotational or circular motion gives rise to, for example, the familiar centrifugal force, the presence of which may be recognized without reference to changes
in motion relative to any surrounding
system of material
objects.8 Newton illustrates the significance of this step
in his position with his famous «bucket experiment» (PNP 10f).9