There are only a few e-readers on the market that run Google Android as their operating
system of choice instead of Linux.
Not exact matches
Instead of trying to come up with safe ways to serve food they would rather spend money on pulling the wool over our eyes or using the political
system give us no
choice in the matter.
That is exactly what we need to remedy in our health - care
system:
Instead of offering a vast array
of choices, we must eliminate options that are needlessly risky and expensive by providing more proof
of what works best.
So this evening, I will approach this subject, the economics
of food, in order to answer the following question: What kind
of economic and political
system would we have as a consequence
of making food
choices that are truly healthy, fundamentally supportive
of optimal development and superb well - being,
instead of merely convenient.
Instead of filling in boxes or selecting from drop down menus, their
system uses a series
of buttons to push to select the appropriate
choices, for most
of the questions, anyway.
Unfortunately, we lack a robust
system of school
choice and
instead have to rely on democratic institutions, like school boards and state legislatures, to determine most school policies and practices.
David Simmons, head
of the Local Government Association's children and young people board, commented that: «School autonomy is supposed to drive up standards, but in the case
of school meals we now have a two - tier
system where one type
of school can effectively exempt pupils from healthy
choices and
instead chose to sell fatty and sugary foods.
Instead of a
system with limited
choice for families, predicated on a lottery
system, all families in the District should have control over their child's share
of education funding, and should be able to take those funds to any school or education option
of choice.
«
Instead of a one - size - fits - all
system of education, we need to fully embrace an education marketplace where
choice and competition is the rule rather than the exception.
Instead of imposing ineffective bureaucratic «accountability» on schools, our education
system should ensure
choice to all students so that every school is held truly and directly accountable to families.
This would put an end to funding
systems that are the product
of bureaucratic convenience and ensure
instead that the dollars intended to educate each student will follow him to his school
of choice.
Instead, the new Rav4 features the buyer's
choice of a 2.5 - liter I - 4 mated to an eight - speed automatic or a hybrid variant that combines a similar 2.5 - liter I - 4 with a CVT and the automaker's «Toyota Hybrid
System II» setup.
Instead, a blend
of supple leather, Alcantara, ornate stitching, and glass surfaces are paired with a
choice of open - pore wood or chopped carbon inlays, a Bang & Olufsen sound
system, and Mercedes - Benz's electronic architecture.
A flexible cargo management
system is available where attachment points can be moved along a rail,
instead of fixed points on the body, so customers have greater
choice when tying down a load.
Once the game and
system opens up, however, it becomes interesting and important strategy to decide if characters are going to learn another role at a very high price and abandon buffed stats, or favour more powerful characters
instead of extremely helpful
choice in battle.
They killed socom by making or allowing TERRIBLE
choices / CHANGES to the game
instead of staying true to what the original ps2 GREAT socom games were, and they're killing the VITA by not supporting the beautiful machine with beautiful games... KISS = Keep it SIMPLE, Silly;) Make MORE beautiful games for the VITA if you want that beautiful screen to SHINE and that sexy lil
system to SELL.
That, or they knew all along that they were purposely undermining the
system because that's the entire point
of offering players the «
choice» to buy Orcs
instead of playing to earn them.
Looking at the release
of 1999 games... I'd say if my
choice isn't Smash Bros it'd likely be Spyro 2, which I think is the only game in the series that has hold fairly well despite some obvious aging problems (although I'm sure many others would likely put
System Shock 2 or Age
of Empires 2
instead).
So long as we live under this corporate capitalist
system we have little
choice but to go along in this destruction, to keep pouring on the gas
instead of slamming on the brakes, and that the only alternative — impossible as this may seem right now — is to overthrow this global economic
system and all
of the governments
of the 1 % that prop it up and replace them with a global economic democracy, a radical bottom - up political democracy, an eco-socialist civilization.
Given that, if one wants freedom
of choice and an efficient market, shouldn't one accept a market solution (tax / credit or analogous
system based on public costs, applied strategically to minimize paperwork (don't tax residential utility bills — apply upstream
instead), applied approximately fairly to both be fair and encourage an efficient market response (don't ignore any significant category, put all sources
of the same emission on equal footing; if cap / trade, allow some exchange between CO2 and CH4, etc, based CO2 (eq); include ocean acidification, etc.), allowing some approximation to that standard so as to not get very high costs in dealing with small details and also to address the biggest, most - well understood effects and sources first (put off dealing with the costs and benifits
of sulphate aerosols, etc, until later if necessary — but get at high - latitude black carbon right away)?
Instead, the
system is likely to be marked by the co-existence
of investor - state arbitration and an international investment court, leading to pluralism rather than a dichotomous either / or
choice or a clear before - and - after moment.