While a number of states, including Texas, Tennessee, Virginia, Maryland, and possibly California, are phasing in or plan to develop
a system of rigorous curriculum - based external exams, most states have chosen instead to administer minimum - competency exams.
Not exact matches
That model, I think, is now well known across the state: standards - based
curriculum, radically better assessments,... a fair but
rigorous accountability
system which, as you know, the Regents will soon put into regulations creating the framework
of evaluation for principals and teachers.
Needless to say, they include a vastly more
rigorous curriculum, higher expectations for all students, a knowledge - based rather than a methods - based emphasis in teacher education, and a more thoughtful
system of assessment rather than the relatively mindless fill - in - the - blank approach
of so many conventional standardized tests.
Never in a million years were we going to see forty - five states truly embrace these
rigorous academic expectations for their students, teachers, and schools, meet all the implementation challenges (
curriculum, textbooks, technology, teacher prep, etc.), deploy new assessments, install the results
of those assessments in their accountability
systems, and live with the consequences
of zillions
of kids who, at least in the near term, fail to clear the higher bar.
We have seen urban public schools successfully adopt many charter school «secrets,» including the nine - hour school day (e.g., United for Success Academies in Oakland); a
rigorous, standard
curriculum (e.g., the more than a dozen Chicago public schools that offer the International Baccalaureate); merit pay (e.g., the Washington, D.C.,
system); and the regular use
of teacher video in professional development and evaluation (e.g., the Houston
system, which was using video in this way as early as the 1980s).
Texas's
rigorous curriculum requirements as a default
curriculum for all students and the role
of the post-secondary
system in setting high school graduation standards.
These included a strong vision
of and value for public education in which almost Finnish children participate as the creator
of Finland's future society; resulting high status for the country's teaching profession whose members are stringently selected through
rigorous university - based teacher education programs that confer Masters degrees on all
of them; a widespread culture
of collaboration in
curriculum development among teachers in each school district; an equally robust culture
of collaboration among all partners in strong local municipalities where most
curriculum and other policy decisions are made; and a
system of widespread cooperation and trust instead
of US - style test - based accountability.
Finally, the paper outlines eight
system - level characteristics
of a high - quality CTE program, including: career - oriented educational
systems; strong options for all students;
rigorous academic
curricula;
rigorous technical skill development; employability skills; professional development for teaching staff and leaders; support services for students; and assessment / accountability.
How ironic — let's tests these kids under the «new, more
rigorous system» despite teaching them the old
curriculum for most
of their primary years... Marvellous!
Our
curricula provides school
systems with a
rigorous program that showcases a
systems - level understanding
of real - world applications
of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
LDC supports
systems in developing architectures
of guaranteed
curriculum, with the goal
of ensuring equity across a
system for teacher access to high - quality
rigorous curriculum, and student access to the types
of learning experiences that guarantee college and career readiness.
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE School Library leaders design, deliver and support intellectually
rigorous and coherent
systems of curriculum, instruction and assessment in collaboration with classroom teachers and administration to assure each learner's academic and / or professional success and well - being.
Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment - Effective School Library leaders design, deliver and support intellectually rigorous and coherent systems of curriculum, instruction and assessment to promote each learner's academic and / or professional success and wel
Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment - Effective School Library leaders design, deliver and support intellectually
rigorous and coherent
systems of curriculum, instruction and assessment to promote each learner's academic and / or professional success and wel
curriculum, instruction and assessment to promote each learner's academic and / or professional success and well - being.
EFFECTIVE School Library leaders design, deliver and support intellectually
rigorous and coherent
systems of curriculum, instruction and assessment in coordination with classroom teachers to enhance each learner's academic and / or professional success and well - being.