«We have shown that internal global climate -
system variability accounts for at least 80 % of the observed global climate variation over the past half - century.
Not exact matches
The American Statistical Association concluded recently that teachers
account for about 1 per cent to 14 per cent of the
variability in test scores, and that the majority of opportunities for quality improvement are found in
system - level conditions.4 In other words, most of what explains student achievement is beyond the control of teachers or even schools, and therefore arguing that teachers are the most important factor in improving the quality of education is simply wrong.
Just recently, the American Statistical Association said: «Most VAM studies find that teachers
account for about 1 % to 14 % of the
variability in test scores, and that the majority of opportunities for quality improvement are found in the
system - level conditions.
As for OHC, it is likely to be a combination of internal
variability, not
accounting for heat increases below 700m, and issues with the observing
system — compare to the Lyman et al analysis.
Whether ocean circulation models... neither explicitly
accounting for the energy input into the
system nor providing for spatial
variability in the mixing, have any physical relevance under changed climate conditions is at issue.»
«The science of climate dynamics: continues to publish findings about solar / climate relationships and internal
variability of the climate
system that invalidate the
account of the Earth's climate dynamics presented by the IPCC; predicts the likelihood of an extended period of global cooling, if the emergent solar cycle 24 has a low amplitude, as seems increasingly likely on the basis of current science,» Mackey explained.
[8] C.L. Weber, P. Jaramillo, J. Marriott, C. Samaras, Uncertainty and
variability in
accounting for grid electricity in life cycle assessment, in: Sustainable
Systems and Technology, 2009.
Firstly, even with man - made global warming taken into
account, because of the short - term noise due to the internal
variability in the climate
system, climate models predict that there will be decades where natural cycles dampen the man - made warming trend.
However, this method does not
account for the natural
variability in the Arctic
system that may be an important factor in trends over the recent past.
If however you could make a positive suggestion as to alternative mechanism to
account for observations then that would be welcome but I hold out no hope of that because you don't even accept that the observations do differ from what we would expect from internal
system variability on it's own.
New structural forms are needed for climate models that are capable of simulating the natural internal
variability of the coupled ocean - atmosphere
system on timescales from days to millennia and that can accurately
account for the fast thermodynamic feedback processes associated with clouds and water vapor.»
In particular the observed differential warming and cooling of the layers above the tropopause which doesn't seem to be adequately
accounted for by
system variability from below.
I really want to know if ALL observations can be FULLY
accounted for by internal
system variability with NO influence from above via solar
variability.