Although online and paper participants did not differ significantly on the assessed variables and relationships, other
systematic differences between groups may have affected the data.
Despite extensive comparisons, there was no evidence of
systematic differences between these groups, suggesting that losses to follow - up did not have an adverse effect on study randomization.
Not exact matches
Between those who guessed the experiments» purpose, and those who didn't, «there was no systematic difference between those two groups,» Wit
Between those who guessed the experiments» purpose, and those who didn't, «there was no
systematic difference between those two groups,» Wit
between those two
groups,» Witt said.
Thus there was no evidence of
systematic and significant
differences between the
groups in terms of medication.
However, the studies in this
systematic review
grouped experience of CSA together as a homogenous
group with only six reporting any characteristics of the CSA participants and only one study (Douglas 2000) reporting analyses
between CSA characteristics, finding no significant
difference between scores on the PSI for intra and extra-familial abuse.