Sentences with phrase «systematic reviews»

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

«Under the Personal Independence Payment claimants will have a face - to - face assessment and systematic reviews — something missing in the current system — to ensure the billions we spend give more targeted support to those who need it most.»

NIHR Programme of centrally - managed pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews of priority to the NHS and users of the NHS: 10 / 4001/02

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (the Handbook)(Higgins 2011).

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011).

We also compared the Index to the Cochrane tool for assessing Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS - I)[38], which is widely used to assess research quality in systematic reviews [59].

Analysis of data from 28 systematic reviews and meta - analyses, of which 22 were commissioned specifically for the Series, indicate that breastfeeding not only has multiple health benefits for children and mothers, but it also has dramatic effects on life expectancy (Paper 1, table).

Recent systematic reviews have concluded that probiotics do not appear to be effective for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, and that there is insufficient evidence to support their use for atopic dermatitis treatment (42,43).

We thought at first that there may be risk for confounding if the control group used uterotonics or analgesics, but our review of the latest systematic reviews gave us no reason to suspect that this would confound the results; though it was interesting that neonatal safety of uterotonics and analgesics was determined based on limited outcomes of APGARs and NICU admission.

According to a recent review of studies in the Cochrance Database of Systematic Reviews, developmental care has been shown to» [improve] short - term growth and feeding outcomes, [decrease] respiratory support, [decrease] length and cost of hospital stay, and [improve] neuro - developmental outcomes to 24 months corrected age.»

Two review authors (H Whitford, T Dowswell, H West, or S Wallis) independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

It has been reported in systematic reviews that educational interventions based on different methods have proved more effective than those focused solely on a simple method [25], the same conclusion discussed by Tahir et al. urging them to think about establishing different support methods according to mothers» needs during the postpartum period [26].

For example, systematic reviews directly linking breastfeeding to stunting are not currently available.

Coloured icons indicate that there is evidence of a direct link between the intervention of interest and target (s); i.e. systematic reviews are available assessing the effect of the intervention on an outcome directly relevant to the targets (e.g. prevalence of stunting, rate of breastfeeding, etc.).

Analysis of data from 28 systematic reviews and meta - analyses, of which 22 were commissioned specifically for the Series, indicate that breastfeeding not only has multiple health benefits for children and mothers, but it also has dramatic effects on life expectancy.

Therese Dowswell and Helen West's work is supported by an NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/05 — Pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

Where indirect links have been noted, systematic reviews linking the intervention directly to one or more targets are not currently available; i.e. the studies included in the review (s) do not assess the effect of the intervention on the outcomes that are directly relevant to the targets.

However, systematic reviews linking breastfeeding to a reduction in diarrhoea are available, as are reviews linking diarrhoea to increases in stunting.

Recently the Cochrane Collaboration, which maintains a set of databases providing systematic reviews of the scientific evidence related to various healthcare practices, published a review on restricting oral fluid and food intake during labor.

Twenty electronic databases from the fields of medicine, psychology, social science and education were comprehensively searched for RCTs and systematic reviews to February 2006.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016

Where systematic reviews or meta - analyses are available, allowing analysis of findings from a number of well - selected studies, these obviously provide a stronger evidence base on which it is possible to base arguments with greater conviction.

HIV Medicine DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00918.x IBFAN - Asia Position Statement on HIV and Infant Feeding, 13 October 2008 South African Tshwane Declaration on breastfeeding, S Afr J Clin Nutr 2011; 24 (4) UNAIDS 2010, Strategy Getting to Zero, UNAIDS Strategy 2011 — 2015 UNAIDS 2010, Agenda for Accelerated Country Action for Women, Girls, Gender Equality and HIV, 2010 - 2014 UNAIDS 2011, Countdown to Zero: Global plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive, 2011 - 2015 UNAIDS 2011 Press Release, 9 June, World leaders launch plan to eliminate new HIV infections among children by 2015 UNICEF Convention on the Rights of the Child UNICEF 2010, Facts for Life UNICEF 2011, Programming Guide, Infant and Young Child Feeding, 26 May 2011 WHO / UNICEF 2003, Global strategy for infant and young child feeding WHO 2007, Evidence on the long - term effects of breastfeeding: systematic reviews and meta - analysis WHO, UNAIDS, UNICEF 2009, Towards universal access: scaling up priority HIV / AIDS interventions in the health sector: progress report 2009 WHO 2009, Women and health, Today's evidence tomorrow's agenda WHO 2009, Acceptable medical reasons for use of breast - milk substitutes WHO 2009, Rapid advice: use of antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant womenand preventing HIV Infection in infants WHO 2009, Rapid advice: revised WHO principles and recommendations on infant feeding in the context of HIV WHO 2010, Priority Interventions — HIV / AIDS prevention, treatment and care in the health sector WHO 2010, Guidelines on HIV and infant feeding: Principles and recomendations for infant feeding in the context of HIV and a summary of evidence WHO 2010, Annexure 7b to Guidelines on HIV and infant feeding.

[2] E. Moore, G. Anderson, N. Bergman and T. Dowswell, «Early skin ‐ to ‐ skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants,» Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 5, 2012.

Olsen & Clausen: The first study listed, by Olsen and Clausen, was from 2012 and was published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

However, intervention studies — both primary studies and systematic reviews — rarely assess impacts on socioeconomic inequalities, and thus little is known about which interventions are effective and cost - effective for reducing those inequalities.2 — 4

We do have systematic reviews and meta - analyses and none of these syntheses have found a reason to suspect there is an increase in poor outcomes with water birth.

REVIEW METHODS: We included systematic reviews / meta - analyses, randomized and non-randomized comparative trials, prospective cohort, and case - control studies on the effects of breastfeeding and relevant outcomes published in the English language.

Forty - three primary studies on infant health outcomes, 43 primary studies on maternal health outcomes, and 29 systematic reviews or meta - analyses that covered approximately 400 individual studies were included in this review.

This from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Soo has used a wide range of methods, in her research, including trials, surveys, systematic reviews (metasynthesis and meta - analysis), ethnography, phenomenology, and participatory action research based on appreciative enquiry.

Cochrane database of systematic Reviews.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7: CD007202.

Were WHO to give such a recommendation, it would have to follow a strict guideline development process based on grading of all available evidence collected through systematic reviews by expert panels free from conflict of interest.»

The two independent systematic reviews of the evidence (one in 2007 and another in 2010) found no proven benefit for the formulas — except possibly for pre-term babies.

«Our systematic reviews emphasise how important breastfeeding is for all women and children, irrespective of where they live and of whether they are rich or poor.

Cochrane Database of systematic reviews (3) CD003519

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7.

World Health Organization Evidence of long - term effects of breastfeeding: systematic reviews and meta - analyses.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (5): CD002006.

«obtained information about the associations between breastfeeding and outcomes in children or mothers from 28 systematic reviews and meta - analyses, of which 22 were commissioned for this review».

The authors, «obtained information about the associations between breastfeeding and outcomes in children or mothers from 28 systematic reviews and meta - analyses, of which 22 were commissioned for this review».

Her work in systematic reviews has consistently addressed tough topics and has included documenting harms of episiotomy, the limitations of data about outcomes of fetal surgery, inconsistencies in results of programs designed to reduce use of cesarean, marginal effectiveness of medications for overactive bladder, and the burden on cervical cancer prevention programs introduced by liquid cytology collection for pap testing.

Importance Food industry sponsorship of nutrition research may bias research reports, systematic reviews, and dietary guidelines.

Evidence from international systematic reviews shows that food advertising can influence children's food preferences and behaviours [2, 3] and should therefore be addressed as part of any potential solution to childhood obesity.

There are no meta - analyses of RCTs of milk / milk product consumption and fracture outcomes or incidence of osteoporosis; however, there are meta - analyses and systematic reviews of calcium supplementation and fracture and meta - analyses of prospective studies of dairy intake and fracture (29, 30).

These findings indicate that systematic reviews that reported financial conflicts of interest or sponsorship from food or drink companies were more likely to reach a conclusion of no positive association between SSB consumption and weight gain than reviews that reported having no conflicts of interest.

For example, the scientists involved in the systematic reviews that reported having no conflict of interest may have had preexisting prejudices that affected their interpretation of their findings.