Integrated Family Therapy's para-modern position holds on to the usefulness of what can be recruited from past years of
systemic family therapy literature such as the patterns and relational factors within families described by Structural family therapists, but equally holds on to the constructed aspects of family life in a social context.
Not exact matches
Integrated
Family Therapy invites caution when embarking on a therapeutic journey with a family: none of the most commonly occurring or most frequently cited issues in the systemic literature may turn out to be salient to that particular family during th
Family Therapy invites caution when embarking on a therapeutic journey with a family: none of the most commonly occurring or most frequently cited issues in the systemic literature may turn out to be salient to that particular family during t
Therapy invites caution when embarking on a therapeutic journey with a
family: none of the most commonly occurring or most frequently cited issues in the systemic literature may turn out to be salient to that particular family during th
family: none of the most commonly occurring or most frequently cited issues in the
systemic literature may turn out to be salient to that particular
family during th
family during
therapytherapy.
From the earliest conception of westernised
family therapy in the mid to late 20th century, where directive, structured models dominated practice and
literature, to the shift to neutrality and curiosity, where
systemic theory started to become more mainstream, through the safe and sometimes unsafe uncertain times of constructionism, to the present day, where appreciation of past -LSB-...]
From the earliest conception of westernised
family therapy in the mid to late 20th century, where directive, structured models dominated practice and
literature, to the shift to neutrality and curiosity, where
systemic theory started to become more mainstream, through the safe and sometimes unsafe uncertain times of constructionism, to the present day, where appreciation of past and present are coming together, exciting and ultimately useful concepts abound.
They maintain competence in explaining
literature and implementing practice through best - and
systemic - interventions across multiple fields (e.g.,
Family Therapy, Medicine, Nursing), and through a variety of theories and models as they interface with systemic health concerns (e.g., motivational interviewing with patients who wish to stop smoking, structural family therapy + psychoeducation for adolescents living with diab
Family Therapy, Medicine, Nursing), and through a variety of theories and models as they interface with systemic health concerns (e.g., motivational interviewing with patients who wish to stop smoking, structural family therapy + psychoeducation for adolescents living with dia
Therapy, Medicine, Nursing), and through a variety of theories and models as they interface with
systemic health concerns (e.g., motivational interviewing with patients who wish to stop smoking, structural
family therapy + psychoeducation for adolescents living with diab
family therapy + psychoeducation for adolescents living with dia
therapy + psychoeducation for adolescents living with diabetes).
The purpose of this set of arguments — which is the result of collaboration between the national associations for
family / couple and
systemic therapy — is to review the complex issue of the efficacy of these
therapies, based on the scientific
literature.