Family
systems theory assumes that the family as a whole is larger than the sum of its parts.
Not exact matches
Financial industry norms and academic
theories — even popular beliefs — have always
assumed assets saved for retirement would be systematically withdrawn — following the «4 % rule» or some other rule of thumb or
system — by retirees in order to maintain a consistent standard of living.
Assuming other
systems have a similar distribution, this adds to the
theory's plausibility, they say.
Current
theories assume that
systems are at least locally stable, which doesn't hold for some of the most interesting cases, from the Big Bang to black holes.
You are quite correct: To
assume that tracer measurements and linear
system theory only work with «one - directional transfer»
systems is not only wrong, it is completely without logical or empirical foundation and demonstrates a significant lack of knowledge about the subject.
Several
theories assume that the development of parent — adolescent relationships and friendships is associated (e.g., organizational
system perspective, Laursen and Bukowski 1997; attachment
theory, Schneider et al. 2001).
Following the family
systems theory, we
assume that coparenting support is necessarily a mutual process and that a parent in need of support may struggle to support his or her partner in return.