Not exact matches
obviously I would prefer to have a much more suitable alternative in the defensive midfielder positions but if they
focused more on defensive end and the occasional long - ball, this would allow Bellerin and Sead ample opportunities to bomb forward on their respective wings while still having enough cover to maintain their defensive shape... it would likewise allow for overlapping runs on both wings, thereby letting both Sanchez and Perez to cut inside and get shots away in and around the top of the box with their most dominant feet... if goals were needed I would sub Bellerin for OX and bring Ramsey in for Elneny then switch to a 3 -2-4-1 (more of a 3 -1-5-1 with Ramsey playing higher up the pitch) and I would only use Giroud as a sub when the game dictated it for
tactical reasons... this would allow us to be a high energy team with incredible link - up play and a much more direct
approach in the offensive end
Perhaps Liverpool need a new, more effective
tactical approach for these matches, one which
focusses on creating overloads out wide, but even then, Liverpool lack aggression from their midfield, the number of through balls is low, as was the number of dribbles, and if packing stats were available for Liverpool, I would imagine only Emre Can may have had a chance of standing out, for Liverpool's passing was far too passive and slow.
That
approach was effective for a time but was somewhat too narrow and
tactical,
focusing largely on the crisis du jour.
The
tactical approach on where to invest included advising investors to tread carefully with fixed income investments, favouring large cap companies to smaller cap companies and to
focus on what he calls «dividend - growth stocks».
For those who appreciate Franklin Templeton's strong
focus on bottom - up analysis in individual security selection, the complementary nature of our
approach to
tactical asset allocation offers a potential added benefit.»
But beyond these
tactical approaches, climate change communication is fundamentally a structural and institutional challenge that requires broader strategy and
focused investment to manage.
For human rights lawyers, to be able to
focus more time on their
tactical approach in an increased number of cases may mean not just more wins, but furthering the push towards democracy and constitutional governance.