Sentences with phrase «tactical position of»

But the primary consideration is the strength and tactical position of petitioners and their converts in this country.

The department also urged the public and news media not to compromise officer safety by broadcasting the tactical positions of homes being searched.

Not exact matches

It's definitely more of a tactical market, but our investment style in the fixed - income group is such that we're not going to be incredibly active in jerking our positions around — that is, we aren't much for making daily or weekly shifts in our model portfolio positions.

Due to our investment in North American Rescue, LLC, a leading supplier of mission - critical tactical medical products to the military and law enforcement, and our relationship with Renaissance Strategic Advisors, one of the most influential defense consultancies, we are well positioned to identify, win and manage opportunities in this sector.

The sales manager is in the unique position of serving as a critical leverage point in distributing a company's message and in ensuring the implementation of the go - to - market strategy, with (all too often) little input into the strategy and tactical plans that are developed.

Support a manager who consistently makes poor tactical decisions such as playing players out of position and failing EVERY year to strengthen where we need it.

-- consistent injury issue — no signings (when we need them and there are better players out there than we have in our team / squad)-- no strength in depth (kids, or not sufficient quality bought)-- no consistency in performance (motivation)-- tactical nativity and inflexibility — players played out of position or too Many like minded players accommodated in same line up.

obviously I would prefer to have a much more suitable alternative in the defensive midfielder positions but if they focused more on defensive end and the occasional long - ball, this would allow Bellerin and Sead ample opportunities to bomb forward on their respective wings while still having enough cover to maintain their defensive shape... it would likewise allow for overlapping runs on both wings, thereby letting both Sanchez and Perez to cut inside and get shots away in and around the top of the box with their most dominant feet... if goals were needed I would sub Bellerin for OX and bring Ramsey in for Elneny then switch to a 3 -2-4-1 (more of a 3 -1-5-1 with Ramsey playing higher up the pitch) and I would only use Giroud as a sub when the game dictated it for tactical reasons... this would allow us to be a high energy team with incredible link - up play and a much more direct approach in the offensive end

Instead of moving players out of position to accommodate a new arrival how about applying some tactical nous and allowing two talented players to both play as strikers.The best teams of 1998 - 2004 had a number of different strikers playing off the genius of Dennis Bergkamp.We had pace, movement and power.Although I would not put Ozil in Bergkamps class he is talented enough to pull the strings with other playmakers such as Jack and Mikki in the side in a 442.

Anyway position is not what people are moaning about, you say we can't compete with City financially but we're not trying, we we're the only team in the top five leagues in Europe last year to make a profit in the transfer window, he's tactical decision can not be understood by anyone, some of the teams and systems he picks are laughable, square pegs in round holes no success in 12 years apart from FA cups, a competition that carries no weight anymore.

1) On the pitch: - we always start 3 -4-3 but always switch back to a back 4... it isn't tactical as we look bad in both - Bellerin playibg LWB when you have the best in the bundesliga last season on the bench - Welbeck playing the striker role when he can do everything but score when you have Lacazette a record signing on the - Monreal in back 3 when you have Kostafi who can flank Per in the middle protecting him against pace as well as having a commending figure and - Telling Xhaka to not play as a 3rd offensive player when Ramsey dashes - Playing a guy in Ox so out of position and persisting with him over preseason as if he would be there for years when it is clear he doesn't want to play for us (his case is a weird one)

Of course, losing wingers Robben and Ribery will have forced his hand slightly here, but it still shows a lack of a Plan B that Pep couldn't bring out a similar threat from other players like Gotze and Muller, who can both play wide, or indeed use Lahm in his preferred position of right - back and utilise his quality from there — in fact, the former Germany captain's use as a midfielder since this manager's arrival is one of many examples of his attempts at tactical innovation going wronOf course, losing wingers Robben and Ribery will have forced his hand slightly here, but it still shows a lack of a Plan B that Pep couldn't bring out a similar threat from other players like Gotze and Muller, who can both play wide, or indeed use Lahm in his preferred position of right - back and utilise his quality from there — in fact, the former Germany captain's use as a midfielder since this manager's arrival is one of many examples of his attempts at tactical innovation going wronof a Plan B that Pep couldn't bring out a similar threat from other players like Gotze and Muller, who can both play wide, or indeed use Lahm in his preferred position of right - back and utilise his quality from there — in fact, the former Germany captain's use as a midfielder since this manager's arrival is one of many examples of his attempts at tactical innovation going wronof right - back and utilise his quality from there — in fact, the former Germany captain's use as a midfielder since this manager's arrival is one of many examples of his attempts at tactical innovation going wronof many examples of his attempts at tactical innovation going wronof his attempts at tactical innovation going wrong.

i am just 15 and still trying to master the basics but being played out of position messes with your tactical play, not basics like shooting or passing.

our British core has been hit and miss for a while now, i just believe with the right coaching and tactical positioning a lot of them can be very useful players, there are some who need to be told this is what you do and nothing else.

Ofcorse it is, the injuries are to be blamed for all Arsenal problems.This year it is the injuries, last year it is the injuries and the year before that it is the injuries.It is really shame for a club like arsenal to give excuses for their problem on injuries season after season after season.According to the manager, the players and the majority of the fans, the problems has nothing to do with the fact that the club did not strengthened the most problematic area in the team, DM and CBs; it has nothing to do with the fact that players were played out of position; and it has nothing to do with the fact that Wenger's tactical inability (for games like Liverpool 5 - 1, Chelsea 6 - 0, City 6 - 3, Everton 3 - 0, Andrelechet 3 - 3, Swansea 2 - 1).

He is out of touch, he plays his players in the wrong position and he has no tactical clue what he is doing.

No tactical awareness vs the big boys Always getting hit on the counter and useless ourselves at them even though that's the best way to score a goal Players out of position And don't get me started on transfers and always trying to pass through small gaps and not using width

Aside from the usual tactical / systematic naivety he displays by playing players out of position (when better options are available) and generally over packing the midfield with like minded players, This transfer window has thrown up the same baffling questions for me in relation to our manager and his actions (or is that in - action?).

I wish Theiry Henry takes the managerial position, not just because of the love he has towards the club, but the tactical analysis of the game he does at sky sports.

Wenger is a great asset to Arsenal, but as a manager with his flaws, it may be better to move him into an other position at the club and get someone who knows how to prevent injuries wenger could but did nt — or with the tactical variety to prevent losses like at anfield and stamford bridge, or making the change of tactic when we just cant score against teams like leicester.

Whether that's been down to a lack of tactical versatility from the former Juventus ace, or perhaps Jose Mourinho who has received criticism for not playing his star man in his most effective role on the left of a midfield three and in a more advanced position, it has all contributed to an underwhelming campaign overall.

Despite the Dutchman's tactical rethink, Rooney has been out of sorts since slotting into his new position, not having a shot on goal this calendar year and without a goal since Boxing Day.

I agree with you that AW has done some astounding things for the club, but he has also made some reall balls ups and week in week out it seems he is not able to offer up a tactical plan B or utilise key players in key positions against the relevant sides we play, (not starting with Rosicky and Walcott on Saturday was one such instance) I realise that no team wins all their games and I know that we have been under the cosh for quiet a few years now, but what annoys me more than anything else is the lack of Visible ambition, we spent three weeks messing around with Beliek and only just managed to get Paulista who was an uncertainty due to a work visa.

From the way Wenger try out the players I forsee he is not buying any CF.. We all know Wenger tactical wise is so poor, like to put players out of position, use wrong tactics against different team.

Trying to force the tactical changes by playing players out of the position and dropping the goal scorers to the bench replacing with someone with poor finishing.

No mention of tactical changes, improving defense, filling holes in DM position, etc...

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

Poor team selection, players being played out of position, questionable substitutions and lack of tactical nuance have been the hallmarks of Wenger's reign.

What is the purpose to buy someone and play him out of position and with no tactical instructions.

Anything is better than playing players out of position, having no tactical understanding of the game and the complete and total inability to motivate anyone.

Ramsey has had one good season for us since his horrible injury, he needlessly gives the ball away much too often and his finishing is even worse than Giroud's... once again we have fallen in love with the idea of what could have been... Ramsey has only scored 2 meaningful goals in his entire Arsenal tenure: one in Turkey and the other in last year's FA Cup, which is not near enough to make him a centerpiece of this offence... likewise simply his presence on the team sheet has led Wenger into making horrible tactical blunders because he will force Ramsey into the lineup even when it doesn't make sense... just think of all those games when Ramsey was played out wide on the right, which forced the RB to come up into the play far more often, and deeper, because Ramsey invariably would find himself in a more central position leaving us far more vulnerable to the counterattack..

Financially, we are in a the position to splash out on a top name (My personal preference would be Jackson Martinez and I'll explain why later) and as someone mentioned in a previous post, Arsenal's current squad is already quite versatile in terms of squad depth and from a tactical perspective we have enough «different» types of players.

Wenges lack of: — tactical astuteness — an ability to identify and secure sufficient depth in key positions throughout his squad for the season — awareness in the effect of playing players out of position — overall analysis; if it isn't working perhaps change things.

All the financial figures (that you took the time to research) which proves that Arsenal had money to spend, the socialist wage structure, the tactical ineptness of the manager, the signing of rubbish players at high salaries and panic - buys, not strengthening key positions etc etc etc all became false to you.

Given his style of play, position on the field and overall tactical qualities, it was always expected that he would make a good coach, and while he still has plenty to prove on that front, Balague can see an emotional return to Liverpool down the line having established himself as a hero at Anfield.

VERY TRUE, giroud and rvp both don't have pace but rvp's tactical know how, positioning and finishing is world class, giroud's is EXTREMELY average, definitely something he can change, do I believe he will is a whole different question, he had 2 FULL seasons to learn, uninterrupted by injury and unlimited game time, instead of working hard, grabbing the opportunity with both hands and learning, olivier was banging some model, talking to the press and rolling on the ground after 15 misses with his tongue, U TELL ME WHY HE SHOULD I GIVE HIM MY TRUST AND BELIEF?

For a man of his talents, he has under performed for quite a while now in the transfer window, tactical set up in certain games, playing players out of position, failure to beef up the squad in certain areas and player favoritism.

Every coach plays players out of position, sometimes for tactical reasons and sometimes because of d players he has at his disposal.

The only positive to be had from changing the manager would be (we'd hope) better tactical and player position decisions and an injection of enthusiasm.

As much as I want us to sign top quality players whenever possible I think it won't actually matter because Wenger is just going to continue playing people out of position or making tactical errors like leaving Cazorla, Oxlade - Chamberlain and Xhaka on the bench yesterday, or playing Alexis up front on his own.

With Arsenal sitting in a lowly 8th position in the Premier League table and with us playing catch up to Borussia Dortmund in our Champions League group and having been knocked out of the Capital One Cup by Southampton, you might think it strange for me to say that Arsenal have excelled at anything so far this season, but as a tactical stats report on Arsenal.com shows, we certainly have.

He is placed in positions to succeed thanks in large part to Jurgen Klopp's tactical wrinkles and the work of his teammates.

One noticeable feature within this game though was Matip picking the ball up from deep, and moving forward with it — but this particular move had little effect on Swansea's shape at all, and Liverpool's players did not position themselves to take advantage of Swansea's tactical setup.

They cite what they consider to be some strange team selections, players not playing in their best positions, an apparent favouritism for «undroppable players» (Noble being the main one here), poor preparation for games, a lack of organisation and tactical awareness, and players not seeming to understand (or able to carry out?)

One tactical surprise was the shift of Paul Pogba to the right side of Claudio Marchisio to play Asamoah in his natural position.

Rohr has recently tinkered with the Eagles» formation with an eye on the World Cup, and having a player in his ranks who could feature in multiple positions could make a tangible difference for Nigeria in the event of injuries, suspensions, loss of form and a tactical reshuffle.

Moving the Galician back into a slightly more defensive role, and honing his physicality, tactical nous and reading of the game to the «Vertical football» counter-attacking style Herrera had developed, Luis Suarez developed a keen ability to break up play, build considered counter-attacks and then arrive in attacking positions ready to finish them off.

And when you do look at those goals — as I have, on my tactical breakdowns, which you can find on the site — you can see why Liverpool have dropped points, and more often than not it's because of some individual error you can not account for, such as Lovren missing the ball, Matip leaving a header, Karius not positioning himself well enough, a midfielder not tracking his man properly, or the team of officials being useless in enforcing the laws of the game.

Formations are only one part of a tactical set - up, and Klopp is a manager whose own philosophy is built around timing, awareness, positioning, and an ability to perform certain actions at certain points in a game.

In many tactical setups, their prime duty is to provide width on the flanks, allowing the wide attackers to venture to central positions and pose more of a direct threat to the opponent's goalkeeper.