Pretty much where it all was on day one, with an internal inquiry finding that under party rules, Lord Rennard did not bring the party into disrepute — however, that same report
tainted it's own legitimacy
by saying the accounts of alleged victims were credible but could not be proven beyond a reasonable
doubt.
The usual approach is to find some connection (even an imagined one) between any researcher who raises the smallest
doubts about AGW theory and an oil or power company and then declare that the research is
tainted by the bias of these companies that have a strong economic reliance on fossil fuel combustion (and thus the production of CO2).