Sentences with phrase «take a risk on bad»

As noted above, there are many lenders out there who are willing to take a risk on bad credit borrowers.

Not exact matches

More from the CFO Council: Trump's tariff proposal, trade war will be bad for both US and China: CNBC Survey Companies are taking action on gun control because politicians won't: CNBC Survey There's been an «overreaction» in Thai stocks to trade - war risks, says exchange executive

On the other hand, if you're saving for retirement that won't come for 20 or more years, you can take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yeaOn the other hand, if you're saving for retirement that won't come for 20 or more years, you can take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yeaon more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad year.

Given the high allocation to Attractive - or - better rated stocks, and equal allocation to Unattractive - or - worse rated stocks relative to the benchmark XLF, KIE appears well positioned to capture upside potential while taking on an average level of downside risk.

High - profile, successful, and gold - agnostic investment - world luminaries assess the macroeconomic risks of radical monetary policies and reach a similar conclusion: This will end badly: — Seth Klarman: «All the Trumans (reference: a 1998 movie [The Truman Show] in which the main character's entire life takes place on a TV set which he perceives as reality)-- the economists, fund managers, traders, market pundits — know at some level that the environment in which they operate is not what it seems on the surface....

The worst thing you can do is to sell at the bottom because you took on too much risk.

The sermons that are preached from our pulpits may not be as bad as mine was, but most Father's Day sermons tend to beat up on dads rather than encourage them and challenge them to dream big, take risks for God, embark on an adventure, charge ahead, and be a man!

«The cost of Daniel, to perhaps another striker is a lesser cost and puts less risk on us if the worst were to happen and this club gets relegated, because that is the danger we are still in and we can't take our eye off that,»

Like I already said, Walcott may be class as a CF, but why take that risk based on what we already know and what we badly need?

But despite Michigan's play - it - safe ideal, it wouldn't be a bad idea for Jim Harbaugh to take some risks on fourth - and - short.

I think Mbappes build makes him a better fit for the EPL than Lacazette, he is big and quick, can head the ball and dribble past players and a composed finisher for his age, wish we take a risk on him even if its 100 million, worst case scenario is he ends up being a better version of Giroud.

Since casual bettors are willing to take longshot payouts at bad prices, opportunistic bettors can capitalize on artificially inflated lines as sportsbooks attempt to mitigate their risk.

PUTTING BODY ON THE LINE???? I PERSONNALY THINK THAT THIS IS PART OF THE BUSINESS, This is the players» personnal problem based on the decision that they have made to be a Pro-Football player.This is what they are paid for (Millions and millions of wages), and they have to take the risk on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BORON THE LINE???? I PERSONNALY THINK THAT THIS IS PART OF THE BUSINESS, This is the players» personnal problem based on the decision that they have made to be a Pro-Football player.This is what they are paid for (Millions and millions of wages), and they have to take the risk on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BORon the decision that they have made to be a Pro-Football player.This is what they are paid for (Millions and millions of wages), and they have to take the risk on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BORon their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BORO.

However, I think you are rewriting her story so that medical intervention takes on the bad guy role, when it was likely employed to mitigate risks to her and the baby, and quite possibly had that effect.

It appears that some HB supporters think the data only looks bad because not all women and pregnancies taken on by HBMW are low risk... they remain feeling blissfully protected by the fact that their own pregnancy is singleton cephalic presentation.

So what they do is they form a high - risk pool and divvy up the OBs by company so that everyone has to take on the «bad risks» equally.

At worst, it risks taking Labour down the road of wrapping ourselves in the flag of St George and the Union Jack to prove that UKIP and the Tories don't have a monopoly on national pride.

Watson even took the high - risk move on Friday of warning that Brexit would spell the end for Cameron and lead to a takeover by the hard right of the Conservative party, who would be even worse.

The project took on an added air of risk Thursday, in light of not one, not two, but three pieces of bad news.

December 27, 2016 The neighborhood effect: sicker patients draw on shared resources The researchers found that when one patient on a typical 20 - bed hospital unit took a turn for the worse — a cardiac arrest, for example, or being transferred to an intensive - care unit — the other patients on that ward were at increased risk for their own setbacks.

And while a glass of wine isn't bad by any means, when you feel like you've earned more because of your exercise efforts, then routinely drink more, it could have negative effects on your health (taking a toll on your heart, liver, pancreas, and even increasing your risk for several cancers).

With interval workouts there's more injury risk if you over-do it or don't stretch properly or take a bad step while sprinting on an uneven surface — but these are risks most normal - style runners face too.

The possibility that you might leave your ring on the ledge of the sink, or, worse, drop it down the drain, is too great a risk to take.

I hated them anyway, and I think I will from not on always risk a fever over wearing them haha, because taking them off at the toilet of the after party because you realized how bad they looked is just not the way to do it.

If the publisher makes less on each digital sale, well, then that worst - case scenario destroys the publisher, and they can't take that risk.

Take on more risk than you can psychologically and emotionally handle, and you may end up jettisoning stocks when things get bad, locking in losses.

With bad credit, getting a personal loan can prove to be quite difficult because banks don't want to take on too much risk when lending to someone who has a bad history with borrowing.

Ideally, this will include an investment plan that does not require her to take on more risk than she is comfortable with because nothing is worse than not sleeping at night because you're worried about your investments.

(In fact, even if you're approaching retirement age with a nest egg smaller than you'd like, there are better ways to improve your retirement prospects than by taking on more investing risk, which could backfire and leave you worse off.)

Stocks are «high risk» ownership where stockholders take on the risk of good / bad economies, good / bad company performance etc..

Not that it's a bad thing but I prefer to take my risks on the equity side.

Not all lenders offer student loans with bad credit, with most traditional lenders preferring not to take on the risk.

Subprime loans are a higher risk than prime loans, as lenders are taking a chance on someone who has a history of bad credit.

On the other hand, if you're saving for retirement that won't come for 20 or more years, you can take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yeaOn the other hand, if you're saving for retirement that won't come for 20 or more years, you can take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yeaon more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad year.

If you have bad credit, the lender is taking on a higher risk by loaning you money, so most will want a much larger down payment — often 20 - 25 %.

Those going with a zero stock allocation took an emotional risk that they would become frustrated with «missing out» on those great short - term returns and would abandon the strategy just at the worst possible time for doing so.

If it's not fixed - rate, then it's a bad deal because you're taking on the interest - rate risk.

This deposit is important; it's what allows Capital One to take a risk on consumers with bad credit scores.

We absolutely are looking at the kind of changes that would take on a level of credit risk that would be prudent, but clearly, I would expect that the changes we're making would cause bad debt to go up higher, but hopefully with improve the top line and improve the bottom line because essentially it would allow us to leverage admissions and advertising spend, occupancy spend, even academic spending to the point of dealing with more fuller classrooms.

If you are viewed as a poor credit risk you may not be able to take out a consolidation loan, or you may be offered one on worse terms and conditions, for example at a higher interest rate.

They don't feel bad at all for taking a risk on you to make them profit.

You're paying a small sum of money to transfer the risk of bad things happening to you, and if something bad does happen, the company takes care of it because they've taken on the risk of that event happening.

And those focused solely on wealth preservation also struggle: i) they never take a risk, and end up permanently besieged by inflation & taxes, or ii) they duck for cover in defensive (food, health, etc.) & dividend stocks — not a bad strategy, but inevitably it becomes one - dimensional & ends in a price bubble (future growth can't hope to support defensive stock multiples), or an income bubble (dividends are never - ending & will always increase...).

This personal loan with bad credit option, however, inevitably comes with a higher interest rate, and it can be more difficult to find a lender willing to take on the risk.

Private lenders take on huge risks by loaning people with bad credit or without an income that they will not dare loan to any property with excess debt.

Since taking on people with bad credit is a big risk both mortgage lender and broker try to mitigate by charging the mortgage set up fees to clients.

«Increasing the insurance premium on FHA loans is simply a reflection of the substantial risk the administration has taken on in recent years,» says Nancy Osborne, chief operating officer of Erate.com, a Santa Clara, CA - based financial information publisher and interest rate tracker.Rick Sharga Vice President of ReatyTrac says foreclosures were up 21 % from a year ago and 120 % from two years ago and it could get worse.

For one thing, lenders are less willing to take risks on borrowers with bad credit.

The BarCap U.S. Corporate High Yield - to - Worst 10 - year Treasury spread fell from 5.81 to 4.58, while the US 10 - year Treasury yield bottomed out at 1.32 % on July 6.1 Volatility, in the form of VIX, eased during the third quarter, falling from 15.63 to 13.20.1 Although the economy appeared less vibrant in September, a bias toward higher interest rates, a downward slant in high yield spreads and benign volatility were all favorable for investor risk taking.

If the price is already down by discounting the worst, there is very limited downside risk, focus on the upside and take a call.