So the president may
take any military action of any magnitude against any target so long as he informs congress within 48 hours and does not take longer than 60 days?
Not exact matches
Shares
of defense companies tend to outperform the broader market when the United States
takes military action in the Middle East, history shows.
The United States
takes this
action in conjunction with our NATO allies and partners around the world in response to Russia's use
of a
military - grade chemical weapon on the soil
of the United Kingdom, the latest in its ongoing pattern
of destabilizing activities around the world.
«The United States
takes this
action in conjunction with our NATO allies and partners around the world in response to Russia's use
of a
military - grade chemical weapon on the soil
of the United Kingdom, the latest in its ongoing pattern
of destabilizing activities around the world,» said a senior administration official, speaking on condition
of anonymity.
If you live near Joint Base Elmedorf - Richardson, you've likely heard the sounds
of the
military base in
action; the guns firing, the planes
taking off everyday like clockwork, and the base - wide sound system relaying everything from alert messages to the national anthem.
One is that if that type
of military action did
take place, that the stock market would move smartly to the downside.
Nevertheless, Netanyahu's hawkish retort not only increases the odds the US will pull out
of the deal but raises the spectre
of Israel
taking military action against Iranian nuclear facilities.
In the late «90s the neocons urged President Clinton to
take military action against Iraq; their letter to him is reproduced on the dust jacket
of Dorrien's book.
The leaders
of two
of Britain's major church denominations have urged the government to think twice before agreeing to
take part in
military action against Islamic State (IS).
The committee's report recommends
actions that can be
taken by a range
of audiences — including research funding agencies, legislatures, state and school superintendents and athletic directors,
military organizations, and equipment manufacturers, as well as youth who participate in sports and their parents — to improve what is knows about concussions and to reduce their occurrence.
On the other hand, the Assad regime does not appear to have involved its own
military forces in this strike by Iran on Israeli forces, or in many
of the other
actions taken by Iran supported forces against Israel.
With the rising Ukrainian nationalism and the increasingly more and more visible loss
of control
of the central government over the country (in the recent trade blockade
of Donbass by Ukrainian nationalists, president Poroshenko protested the blockade but was unable to force its lifting), it is possible that Ukrainian
military will
take more forceful
action against Donbass and Luhansk, which may force Russia's hand, so not all risk
of war is beyond us.
The
military actions they
take is part
of that goal (to keep and expand their territory).
Even if Congress doesn't declare war, the Vice President would be sworn in as President following from Article II, Section 1
of the Constitution and they would
take military action:
That this House notes that ISIL poses a direct threat to the United Kingdom; welcomes United Nations Security Council Resolution 2249 which determines that ISIL constitutes an «unprecedented threat to international peace and security» and calls on states to
take «all necessary measures» to prevent terrorist acts by ISIL and to «eradicate the safe haven they have established over significant parts
of Iraq and Syria»; further notes the clear legal basis to defend the UK and our allies in accordance with the UN Charter; notes that
military action against ISIL is only one component
of a broader strategy to bring peace and stability to Syria; welcomes the renewed impetus behind the Vienna talks on a ceasefire and political settlement; welcomes the Government's continuing commitment to providing humanitarian support to Syrian refugees; underlines the importance
of planning for post-conflict stabilisation and reconstruction in Syria; welcomes the Government's continued determination to cut ISIL's sources
of finance, fighters and weapons; notes the requests from France, the US and regional allies for UK
military assistance; acknowledges the importance
of seeking to avoid civilian casualties, using the UK's particular capabilities; notes the Government will not deploy UK troops in ground combat operations; welcomes the Government's commitment to provide quarterly progress reports to the House; and accordingly supports Her Majesty's Government in
taking military action, specifically airstrikes, exclusively against ISIL in Syria; and offers its wholehearted support to Her Majesty's Armed Forces.
The 66 Labour MPs who voted with the Government on the main motion to support «
taking military action, specifically airstrikes, exclusively against ISIL in Syria» represented well under a third
of the 231 current Labour members
of Parliament.
If any NATO
actions (NATO being a
military and not a political organization) were to
take place they could easily occur now as there little to prevent sea or land resupply
of any
military.
Jacksonians
take a populist view
of US foreign policy; they support unilateral
military action to pursue American enemies and defend American honour, but are suspicious about global meliorative measures like overseas aid and global governance structures.
«We have a good record on consulting parliament - having a vote in parliament if we decide to
take any
military action and we're conscious
of the views
of parliament on these matters and the need to be consulted,» foreign secretary William Hague said before the recall announcement was made.
In a statement tonight, the Prime Minister said: «The decision to
take military action is one
of the most serious a Prime Minister can make.
Mr Cameron voted in favour
of the invasion in 2003 as a Conservative backbencher and he said all those who backed the
military action should «
take our fair share
of responsibility».
What happens in the dreadful event
of this country being required to
take military action?
However, as the leader
of the UK's main opposition party there is at least a theoretical possibility that he will one day be in the position
of deciding whether or not Britain should
take military action to defend our neighbours and allies.
Having finally recognised the enormity
of the crisis in Burma, Theresa May's government needs to
take more decisive, concrete
action to curb the repression
of Burma's
military and address the suffering and statelessness
of the Rohingya.
The question
of whether he would ever support the UK
taking military action is one which he has repeatedly dodged and fudged.
«That this house notes that ISIL poses a direct threat to the United Kingdom; welcomes United Nations Security Council Resolution 2249 which determines that ISIL constitutes an «unprecedented threat to international peace and security» and calls on states to
take «all necessary measures» to prevent terrorist acts by ISIL and to «eradicate the safe haven they have established over significant parts
of Iraq and Syria»; further notes the clear legal basis to defend the UK and our allies in accordance with the UN Charter; notes that
military action against ISIL is only one component
of a broader strategy to bring peace and stability to Syria; welcomes the renewed impetus behind the Vienna talks on a ceasefire and political settlement; welcomes the Government's continuing commitment to providing humanitarian support to Syrian refugees; underlines the importance
of planning for post-conflict stabilisation and reconstruction in Syria; welcomes the Government's continued determination to cut ISIL's sources
of finance, fighters, and weapons; notes the requests from France, the US and regional allies for UK
military assistance; acknowledges the importance
of seeking to avoid civilian causalities; using the UK's particular capabilities; notes the Government's will not deploy UK troops in ground combat operations; welcomes the Government's commitment to provide quarterly progress reports to the House; and accordingly supports Her Majesty's Government in
taking military action, specifically airstrikes, exclusively against ISIL in Syria; and offers its wholehearted support to Her Majesty's Armed Forces.»
While Congress prepares to vote on whether or not to
take military action against Syria, two local members
of Congress are still considering all the facts.
Britain has been accused
of being spineless in its refusal to become further involved in the French
military action taking place in Mali
Yes, the government lost the 2013 Commons vote on
military action in Syria, largely because it was mishandled — but having lost that vote, Cameron had no choice but to rule out
military action, and his decision not to
take it was a reassuring signal that the era
of hard - charging militaristic unilateralism was over.
The debate
took place after the Speaker, John Bercow, allowed a Labour motion saying MPs had «considered parliament's rights in relation to the approval
of military action by British forces overseas».
Take «invading Iraq» versus «liberating Iraq» — those are different ways
of framing the same
military action, but there is a fact involved here as to which it is, and that depends on whether the majority
of the population resented the former regime and welcomes the new one, or vice versa.
The sorts
of technologies this might draw upon are diverse, Schneider says: everything from sensors that monitor the activity
of people to software that would guide the
actions of military commanders in the field by
taking social and psychological factors into account.
A device developed to monitor US
military pilots looks at biomarkers in breath to spot the first signs
of hypoxia, allowing
action to be
taken earlier
Like Errol Morris's The Fog
of War, The Gatekeepers is a documentary that
takes a hard and critical look at
military / intelligence
actions and their consequences.
The Gunman (R for profanity, sexuality and graphic violence) Pierre Morel (
Taken) directed this international
action thriller revolving around a
military vet - turned - soldier
of fortune (Sean Penn) ready to retire but on the run to clear his name when he unfairly becomes marked for assassination.
When two strange new M.U.T.O.'s (Massive Unidentified Terrestrial Organisms) hatch from their chrysalis, Godzilla's dormant slumber ends, as the big G reveals himself to the world to
take on the M.U.T.O.'s, and the
military decides the best course
of action to
take against creatures they don't yet understand.
With Lone Survivor, based on the memoir
of Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell, the titular lone survivor
of a botched four - man special forces mission in Afghanistan, Berg's examinations
of the masculine
take their logical turn from bachelor parties to football to superheroes to
military action.
That recognition is critical, in an era where the country's continued
military action is
taking place off the front pages and increasingly out
of view.
So when first lady Michelle Obama and I started Joining Forces, our initiative to encourage all Americans to
take action to find ways to honor and support our service men and women, veterans and
military families, I knew part
of what I would focus on was raising awareness about the
military child experience in the classroom.
This time around, Cameron was catching some heat for having
taken a second summer vacation as Britain was getting deeper involved in
military action against the Islamic State in Iraq but noted he would have no trouble
taking care
of his duties from his BlackBerry device.
Being ready to
take action is a characteristic
of the
military.
Eventually the truth will out, revealing that the
action takes place in the broken mind
of a recovering injured
military operative.
Playing as Jean - Luc Cougar, a member
of the unfortunately named S.C.A.T. (Special Covert
Action Team), you're tasked with infiltrating a
military weapons compound that has been
taken over by terrorists.
Blood Dragon is a parody
of action films and video games from the 1980s and is set on a retro - futuristic island where players
take control
of a
military cyborg named Rex.
The biggest flaw in the neocon approach is the hypocrisy
of applying the precautionary principle to spend trillions
of dollars responding to «best available»
military intelligence, but posturing to insist on 110 % certainty when it comes to
taking action to avert possible environmental threats.
For the
military to
take AGW seriously would mean
taking expensive
action, on the order
of the expensive mitigation or adaptation steps the rest
of the government is also not
taking.
Countries are perfectly allowed to complain about the treatment
of their citizens, to
take diplomatic
action against countries that mistreat them, and in extreme cases (not including this one) to use
military action.
Courts are utterly unqualified to determine proper diplomatic or
military actions to
take, or to evaluate whether the President's
actions were enough to meet the requirement
of «do what's necessary to restore security;» foreign policy is a case where a country needs a unified face (because other countries aren't particularly willing to deal with US internal politics), and where the courts could easily screw up what the government is doing; and whether to send Americans to war is a question that is clearly a matter for those accountable to the people.
His family filed a negligence and wrongful death suit against the state Department
of Military and Veterans Affairs, claiming the veterans home failed to
take timely
action.
Some people feel the
military action taken by the U.S. will inevitably lead to some form
of retaliation, increasing some people's fear
of travel.