Sentences with phrase «take decades of data»

Scientists can't prove that global warming is the cause, because that would take decades of data and research.
Underwater temperatures are much more variable, and it may take decades of data to reveal a significant change, so we're not sure if this means that we just don't have enough data to detect it yet.»

Not exact matches

With the explosion of digital marketing this past decade, chief marketing officers have become exposed to tremendous troves of data and are taking advantage of the information available to them.
While this process of gathering and analyzing data has improved significantly over the past decade, chatbots have taken it a step further.
Rogers» take is that while most big web applications that must run on thousands of servers spread all over the world have flowed to AWS, it'll take much longer for important enterprise software like accounting and inventory systems that have run in corporate data centers for decades, to do the same.
Recording and transfer of data to digital has been taking place for decades — from music to movies, cameras to computers.
Characteristically, in her post-meeting press conference Fed Chair Janet Yellen took pains to stress that Fed action would continue to be data dependent, reflecting the slow and meticulously cautious approach that has been the hallmark of U.S. monetary policy for close to a decade.
If you take a look at the global corporate history, you will see that the large cap stocks, also known as Blue Chip stocks are by and far the most consistently high performers in the market, even when you average them across decades of performance data.
Take a decade - by - decade look at just a few of Mathematica's projects that have made a lasting impact on the field of research and the use of data to make a difference.
Researchers used over a decade of imaging data taken by NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to investigate the composition of the Red Planet's frequent...
The authors took advantage of a two decade long data series of fish abundance from the Maria Island Marine Reserve, collected by Dr Neville Barrett and Professor Graham Edgar since 1992 with support from the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service.
Miller - Struttmann and her colleagues then compared other decades - old data about plants visited by the bees with recent work on bee visits, and discovered that these two species had acquired broader tastes than their recent ancestors, taking nectar from many more kinds of flowers than before.
One hindrance to real - world studies of entire dune fields is the amount of time required to acquire sufficient data: it often takes several decades to compile thorough measurements.
«Especially when we talk about investing in science and innovation, where the fruits of those investments may take years or even decades to materialize, we need to make sure that we have a data infrastructure in place to document and evaluate their outcomes,» said Li.
Corroboration by other physicists of Mourigal's newly produced experimental data could take a decade or more.
Preserving a unique scientific legacy that includes data taken for the last two decades on a large number of different astronomical sources.
NCLB launched a decade of building states» data infrastructure; ESSA is about taking advantage of this infrastructure to not only create more meaningful accountability measures, but to also provide greater transparency, empower decisionmaking, personalize learning, and ensure we keep kids on track for success.
The New York - based AUSSIE, which was recently acquired by an Australian company, Editure, took in more than $ 15 million of that amount last year, making it the system's top provider of professional development, according to an analysis by The Hechinger Report of a decade's worth of school spending data obtained from the city education department.
All of those contracts «for the life of the copyright» without reasonable reversion (aka «out of print») clauses force the ossification: The publisher can't adopt a «nimble» pricing policy because its backlist will continue to dominate the actual results, and nobody wants to take a risk on changing the ways things are without any chance of having enough data to even adjust things for half a decade.
Take the 10 years of UAH data from January 1998 to December 2007 — 120 months, 10 years, or 1 decade.
But just a little look at the data and you may note the very ends (Years 1979 & year 2017) have no net adjustments and taking the difference of their unadjusted averages and dividing by the decades between, we arrive at a trend of +0.153 K / decade.
As a comparison it took analysis of millions of data points collected over decades before climatologists were able to show that the atmosphere was warming.
The work in question takes measurements from one locale, and doesn't publish conclusions, rather Doney's statements are giving his opinion about what he read, «Long - term ocean acidification trends are clearly evident over the past several decades in open - ocean time - series and hydrographic survey data, and the trends are consistent with the growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide (Dore et al., 2009).»
Data taken over the past decade indicate that when a lot of Arctic sea ice disappears in the summer, the vortex has a tendency to weaken over the subsequent winter.»
The study team analyzed several million daily high and low temperature readings taken over the span of six decades at about 1,800 weather stations across the country, thereby ensuring ample data for statistically significant results.
At the time of the First Assessment Report the expectation was that it will take a few decades to build up enough empirical data to clearly and unambiguously observe AGW.
I think you can also see the fundamental problem with taking that smoothed data set and just throwing it in with actual temperature measurements with all of their year - to - year and decade - to - decade variations.
Individual tide gauge records can't tell us about SLR in units of cm / decade, because it takes perhaps 5 decades of data to obtain a usefully narrow confidence interval.
There is contamination of the air in the bubble by water; different results are obtained if the ice is crushed or melted to obtain the air sample; it takes decades for the air bubble to form; the raw data was smoothed out by a 70 year moving average that removed the great annual variability found in the 19th century and Stomata Index (SI) records; closer examination revealed a major flaw in the hypothesis because temperature rises before CO2.
Scientists from the University of Miami's school of marine and atmospheric science established the Atlantic's hunger for carbon dioxide by simply looking at data samples taken a decade apart.
I have an inkling what is in the root of both AMO and PDO http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/A&P.htm (both are reconstructions, real data I believe is only taken in last 4 - 5 decades), which leads me to think that the «tele - connection» effect is far less important than it is given credit.
I may be too pessimistic, but based on the history of my science field, this one will be a long fight, it will take decades of non-warming before the evidence of the data becomes heavier than the political bias in the eyes of the average new student.
Worried that decades of key climate data could disappear once President - elect Donald Trump takes office, some researchers from Toronto to the University of Pennsylvania have begun efforts to copy or download as much federal data as possible in coming weeks.
Webby — it is taken from decades of fitting flood data to a frequency distribution.
I would however point out that an instance of North Dakota flooding or freezing is not «global» nor is it indicative of a trend — it is regional and is a single event, and let's please not be myopic here and muddle the issues, as it's even worse «science» to take a single isolated event in time and geography and then attempt to extrapolate it out across the entire globe and into future decades than to depict an out - of - context «hockey stick» of historic data as is being pointed out here.
They find that, with an enlarged data set that has corrections for bias between drifting buoy data and data taken from ship intakes, as well as extended corrections for water cooling in buckets in the time between being drawn from the sea and being measured, there is a statistically significant warming trend of 0.086 °C per decade over the 1998 - 2012 period.
Specifically, they took data from more than 100 years of scientific papers, they compared existing range boundaries with those in the historical record and found that the southern geographic limit retreated by 300 kilometers (or 186 miles) at a rate of 15 - 50 kilometers every decade.
Warmista must adjust downward all historical data of new highs taken from the decades when, according to them, manmade CO2 had become the primary driver of climate change.
Due to the large amount of data that went into the study, it took nearly a decade to complete, Rignot said.
So let's take a look at the supposed expansion in «this decade» relative to previous decades (all figures courtesy of the National Snow and Ice Data Center).
If people want to know the answer then they must invest more time and money in studying and collecting data and it may take decades to get sufficient amount of data to accurately state the relative contribution or even the majority cause.
1) I like the suggestion above of a Bayesian option: if I were to do this, I'd probably take a normal distribution centered on 0.2 degrees / decade as my prior (based on the AR4 model mean warming over the next couple decades... perhaps another option would be a flat distribution from, say, -0.1 degrees to 0.5 degrees), and then see how that changes with added data points.
So, taking out oscillations (which can not be a result of GH forcing), the record shows warming of 0.062 ± 0.010 ºK / decade, as «estimated from data in the tropical latitude band».
Which is why it has taken more than $ 100 billion in research grants, and over two decades of overt government pressure, to «balance» the bad data with the reluctant physical reality.
There has been a data - revolution taking place in the last couple of decades.
The «decades - old credit scoring model» currently used «does not take into account consumer data on rent, utility, and cell phone bill payments,» Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina wrote in August, when he unveiled a bill to require the federal government to vet credit standards used for residential mortgages.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z