On top of that they tend to
take false doctrine and make it into a lifestyle without actually knowing the true meaning of the words they are speaking.
Not exact matches
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did
false religion
take a leap, with
false religious
doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.
Considering that it
took the Church about 300 years, long after they had made up their minds about theology, to start picking scripture to match that
doctrine, and that the oldest known copt of the bible has over 27,000 «corrections» written all over it, how can you be sure that the New Testament isn't full of
false doctrine to begin with?
The Methodists
took constant criticism from people who believed
false reports about their
doctrines and practices.
Thus understood, the
doctrine of radical evil can furnish a receptive structure for new figures of alienation besides the speculative illusion or even the desire for consolation — of alienation in the cultural powers, such as the church and the state; it is indeed at the heart of these powers that a falsified expression of the synthesis can
take place; when Kant speaks of «servile faith,» of «
false cult,» of a «
false Church,» he completes at the same time his theory of radical evil.
Complaints such as Prof. Johnson's would be
taken more seriously if they engaged carefully nuanced reflections on the problem, such as the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith's 1990 document, «The Ecclesial Vocation of the Theologian,» or Avery Cardinal Dulles» 2003 essay, published in these pages, «True and
False Reform.»
No need to
take my word, warning comes before destruction and it Jesus Christ who shall give you the very evidence that you refused to accept while being alive and by then, it will be too late for the unbeliever and the religious people who has taught
false doctrines.
I'm
taking them from people who are leaving the Church, not because of the cost of discipleship, but because of the cost of
false fundamentals — man - made impediments created out of non-essential
doctrines and legalistic rules.
And thus, «
false doctrine», «faithful» and «minister» all
take on different meanings for each different epistemology.
It would be a great shame to me and to you, the noble and renowned German nation... if heresy or decrease of the Christian religion should through our negligence dwell after us in the hearts of men... I regret having delayed so long to proceed against this Luther and his
false doctrine... he is to be
taken back, keeping the tenor of his safe - conduct... I am determined to proceed against him as a notorious heretic, requesting of you that you conduct yourselves in this matter as good Christians as you have promised it to me, and are held to do it.
(2) But as there were
false prophets in Israel, so there will be
false teachers among you — and here «Peter»
takes over the epistle of Jude in order to describe these teachers and their
doctrines.