It's going to be important for the press, and for the Senate HELP committee, to ask a lot of questions to understand where she and the President who chose her plan to
take federal education policy
Still, there's a lot that's not clear, so it's going to be important for the press, and for the Senate HELP committee, to ask a lot of questions to understand where she and the President who chose her plan to
take federal education policy.
Not exact matches
According to the study, postsecondary institutions, STEM departments, accrediting entities, and state and
federal education policies — grounded on the STEM pipeline metaphor that there is only one linear route to a bachelor's STEM degree — have largely ignored the various pathways
taken by students today to earn a STEM degree.
For every
policy that a state department
education or the
federal government erects in connection with or reliant on summative assessment data, however, the longer it will
take states to back off of «Measurement 2.0,» and realize the potential of formative assessment as a teaching, learning, and accountability tool.
Higher
education has
taken K - 12's place in the hierarchy of
federal policy issues — due both to weariness with what well - intended
federal efforts have wrought in K - 12 and to public concerns about tuition prices and student debt.
Though deflating (not to mention terribly expensive), these bumps and bruises, if
taken to heart, could help build a better understanding of the
federal government's inherent strengths and weaknesses in K — 12
education policy, a particularly valuable exercise as NCLB reauthorization looms.
A new report from the Washington - based Center on
Education Policy tracks how four states
taking part in a
federal pilot program are using their added flexibility under the No Child Left Behind Act.
You can
take action now to support
federal education policies that improve public
education and support school principals.
As the
education blogosphere turns its attention from Secretary Duncan's Race to the Top fund to his Investing in Innovation fund, economist Eric Hanushek offers his
take on what
federal education policy can and can not accomplish (and what NCLB got right and how it could be improved) in an interview on John Merrow's blog.
The new Every Student Succeeds Act, which
takes full effect in the 2017 - 18 school year, rolls back much of the
federal government's big footprint in
education policy, on everything from testing and teacher quality to low - performing schools.
Policies that promote school integration by race and class
took a significant hit last week when the U.S. Department of
Education announced that it was killing a small but important
federal program to support local diversity efforts.
The speech to the annual meeting of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the nation's oldest civil rights organization, offered the most detailed picture yet of the direction that the presumptive Republican presidential nominee would
take federal K - 12
education policy if he is elected to the...
The members of our network all want to see strong
federal and state
policy conditions, but as city - based «harbormasters» for ed reform that sit outside the system, they're
taking a multifaceted approach to creating the strongest
education ecosystem possible.
As the
education blogosphere turns its attention from Secretary Duncan's Race to the Top fund to his Investing in Innovation fund, economist Eric Hanushek offers his
take on what
federal education policy can and can not accomplish.
This inclusion parallels the recommendations of the Equity and Excellence Commission's report, signaling that children's experiences with poverty have
taken their place alongside other significant variables impacting student achievement in the
federal education policy framework.
The Roadmap is an especially timely resource, as many states are considering the directions they'll
take with their increased
education -
policy responsibilities under the
federal Every Student Succeeds Act.
«Often, the school board and district staff are considered no more than middlemen in the
education enterprise, passing
federal and state funds on to schools - where the «real work» of
education takes place - and keeping track of school compliance with
federal and state laws, regulations and
policies.»
Congressional leaders, especially those with prior local school board experience,
took full advantage of being in a position to help usher in an exciting new era in
federal education policy.
Although U.S. Secretary of
Education Betsy DeVos took office in February pledging to let states seize control of key education policy decisions under the new federal K - 12 law, her department's responses to states» ESSA plans have surprised - and in some cases irritated - state leaders an
Education Betsy DeVos
took office in February pledging to let states seize control of key
education policy decisions under the new federal K - 12 law, her department's responses to states» ESSA plans have surprised - and in some cases irritated - state leaders an
education policy decisions under the new
federal K - 12 law, her department's responses to states» ESSA plans have surprised - and in some cases irritated - state leaders and others.
But Chad Alderman, a
policy analyst at the consulting firm Bellwether
Education Partners, argued the federal government was always clear about the possibility of getting a higher education board to sign off on alternative standards — even if that took no more than a letter of support without much in the way of policy justi
Education Partners, argued the
federal government was always clear about the possibility of getting a higher
education board to sign off on alternative standards — even if that took no more than a letter of support without much in the way of policy justi
education board to sign off on alternative standards — even if that
took no more than a letter of support without much in the way of
policy justification.
This brief recommends seven ways for supporters of deeper learning to
take advantage of the changing
education policy landscape, as authority shifts from the
federal government to states and local districts.
The new
federal education law allows states and school districts to press the reset button on an array of
education policies, and some advocates are urging policymakers and
education officials to
take advantage of the opportunity to effectively use student data to improve learning and teaching.
Yet, there is a perception that the
federal government has «
taken over» public schools due to the implementation of new teacher evaluation models, Common Core standards and new methods of testing, said Max Marchitello,
policy analyst for pre-K-12
education policy at the Center for American Progress.
A fast - paced exchange between the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation's Mike Petrilli and
Education Counsel's Reg Leichty on a range of crucial issues, from their perspectives on Congress's time line and approach for reauthorizing the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (ESEA) to how frequently educator feedback is
taken into consideration as
federal policy is developed (this session will be available soon as a podcast).
With the current change in leadership at the U.S. Department of
Education and a new president on the horizon, educators are worried about the direction that federal education policy w
Education and a new president on the horizon, educators are worried about the direction that
federal education policy w
education policy will
take.
Third, the
federal government
took an increasingly assertive role in shaping
education policy, with reformers showing themselves to have more faith in prescriptive
policies than in localized solutions or dynamic problem - solving.
Since
taking office in January, Secretary DeVos has been tasked with reviewing the structure and mission of the agency along with analyzing work products (i.e. regulations) within the framework of reducing the
federal imprint on
education policy.
But for school reformers and others, the big question that must be confronted lies not with Clinton's penchant for avoiding transparency, but with what steps she would
take on
federal education policy if she wins the White House next year.
A Social Network Analysis of the American Law Professoriate, 61 Journal of Legal
Education 76 (2011)
Daniel Martin Katz & Derek Stafford, Hustle and Flow: A Social Network Analysis of the American Federal Judiciary, 71 Ohio State Law Journal 457 (2010) Michael Bommarito & Daniel Martin Katz, A Mathematical Approach to the Study of the United States Code, 389 Physica A 4195 (2010) Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz, Jonathan Zelner & James Fowler, Distance Measures for Dynamic Citation Networks 389 Physica A 4201 (2010) Marvin Krislov & Daniel Martin Katz, Taking State Constitutions Seriously, 17 Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy 295 (2008) Daniel Martin Katz, Institutional Rules, Strategic Behavior and the Legacy of Chief Justice William Rehnquist: Setting the Record Straight on Dickerson v. United States, 22 Journal of Law & Politics 303 (2006)