Not exact matches
[5] Virtually all scholars involved with historical Jesus research
believe his existence can be established using docu mentary and other evidence, although most hold that much of the material about him in the New Testament should not be
taken at face value
[5] Virtually all scholars involved with historical Jesus research
believe his existence can be established using documentary and other evidence, although most hold that much of the material about him in the New Testament should not be
taken at face value
belief in anything without supporting evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to
take anything
at face value or to just
believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't
believe everything you see / hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?
The fact you can not
take what he says
at face value and
believe him until he proves otherwise shows you have severe trust issues.
«He
takes scriptural imperatives
at their
face value and
believes this is the only instruction and command God has given him - unmediated by history, unmediated by understanding, unmediated by human experience.
And here, though by «Christianity» he means something very definite (i.e., Roman Catholicism), his words
taken at face value speak for the vast majority of
believing Christians no matter what their denomination.
Therefore, as much as I want to
take her comment
at face value about moving to support her daughter, I have to
believe (cynically, I admit) it is part of the «narrative» to get Wiseman eligible.
Finally, the fact that 38 % of young people said they did not
believe in a God or greater spiritual power, compared with 44 % who did, should not be
taken at face value.
Trust is reciprocal: now that May has declared that she
believes the EU is plotting against her, it is much harder for her counterparts to
take anything she says to them
at face value.
You don't necessarily
believe the story, but the film is engrossing enough to be worth suspending your disbelief for a couple of hours and
taking it
at face value.
Not everything you read should be
taken at face value, and there will be surprises in store, no matter who you
believe.
So while we don't
believe that the record high gold / XAU ratio can be
taken entirely
at face value, there's no question that it is elevated even on a cyclical basis (that is, even allowing for a gradual structural increase over time), and there's no question in the data that cyclically elevated gold / XAU ratios have been associated with strong subsequent gains in the XAU index over a 3 - 4 year period on average, though certainly not without risk or volatility.
I still think there's more going on here than Square - Enix wants us to
believe, but
take their statement
at face value for now.
Only credulous, unquestioning, mouth breathing followers who
believe everything Mann says in his own book would
take it
at face value.
If you would
take the offerings
at face value you would
believe that seniors only need small amounts of life insurance and they would all somehow be better served by not
taking an exam.
7) It left «unresolved mysteries» yes, but they were quickly forgettable if you
take it
at face value which, frankly, when making a film... you're encouraged to firmly
believe your audience is made up entirely by idiots who will do just that.
We
take the comments of our political leaders
at face value and genuinely
believe that they want to do things «with» us and not «to», us.