Sentences with phrase «take kinetic energy»

(The latter is where the electric motor takes kinetic energy away from the wheels and puts it back into the battery.)

Not exact matches

Coumou has taken the story forward, analyzing existing climate models to track the future of eddy kinetic energy over the 21st century.

«As the [droplet's] viscous dissipation is minimal,» the researchers wrote, «the resulting excess surface energy of the droplet is converted to kinetic energy, naturally causing it to dislodge from the surface and take flight into the air.

Kinetic and moving with pulsing energy, Nemes makes a thriller out of a story about a prisoner forced to burn the corpses of his own people who finds moral survival upon trying to salvage from the flames the body of a boy he takes for his son.

Moving linkages and pistons back and forth also takes a lot of energy - Kinetic energy = 1/2 m v squared, and it is that squared which causes the problem.

A flick at the helm is all it takes to change direction, a stab at the brake squashes kinetic energy with vigor, and one pull at the downshift paddle summons enough revs for a slingshot acceleration maneuver.

In practice, the Belt Alternator Starter system takes some getting used to, especially when the battery is using the car's incipient kinetic energy to charge.

One proposed solution to being able to take in more animals and euthanize less animals was to add more kennels, but in reality, this only magnifies the warehousing problem and creates more issues — more staff, money, kinetic kennel energy, etc. — and would only cause the dogs to deteriorate faster.

Destiny 2's weapon systems have also been reworked, with primary, secondary and heavy weapons replaced by a new system: where primaries take up two slots, one has elemental damage, and stronger weapons are all lumped into a third category (named kinetic, energy and power).

This electric energy can thus not be compared on a 1:1 basis with the chemical energy in fossil fuels without taking into account the conversion efficiency of both forms of energy into a useful form (kinetic energy in this case).

APE produced from kinetic energy may take the form of temperature variations that are farther from radiative equilibrium, and thus may be destroyed by differential radiative heating.

The first question is: How long would it take to transfer enough energy to the Greenland Ice Sheet — not to melt it, but to weaken it so that sections of it collapse under their own weight, and potential energy is converted to kinetic energy?

The water vapor evaporated from the surface taking with it latent heat of evaporation (the molecules» kinetic energy) when those water vapor molecules reach the condensation level they change state — and release energy — then again when they freeze they release energy.

When power needs to be taken out of the flywheels - because a cloud crosses in front of the sun for example and a solar farm stops producing power for a short while - the motor shifts to generator mode and converts kinetic to electrical energy, feeding it into the grid.

It takes the power of real heat to heat matter, to move the molecules of matter into vibration, kinetic energy which is heat.

In the real world it takes heat from the Sun to raise the temperature of matter, to heat it, to move the molecules of matter into vibration, which is heat, kinetic energy.

Obviously, the atmosphere is also taking in energy from the sun (radiatively, and solar wind), there's more than just N2, and the conversion of kinetic temperature energy to potential is probably more complex, to make up for this difference.

Ah, I think I take your meaning (although I just finished driving 500 miles and am disinclined at the moment to give it the consideration I ordinarily would): it's possible to pick local reference frames in which the local molecules» kinetic energies are lower than in the reference frame in which the vessel originally containing the gas is stationary.

Now are you claiming you can take a molecule with a certain kinetic energy (which is what temperature is a measurement of), and raise it 17 kilometers above the Earth (increasing its potential energy by 4664 Joules if we're talking about a mole of N2) without inputting more energy, and have it maintain that same kinetic energy, that same temperature?

Ah, I think I take your meaning... it's possible to pick local reference frames in which the local molecules» kinetic energies are lower than in the reference frame in which the vessel originally containing the gas is stationary.

This approximated each storm's kinetic energy, Lin said, because the analysis took into account wind velocities around the center of the storm but not those that were vertical or in the directions toward or away from each storm's center.

Joe: «You additionally observe that I am «taking the extreme and irrelevant sub-thermodynamic case of a minuscule total number of isolated particles — in which regime the macroscopic temperature is increasingly ill - defined and no longer simply proportional to the kinetic energy per particle.»

So your error — according to Velasco et al, as well as myself, DeWitt Payne and probably Robert Brown too — is in taking that marginal height dependence of average molecular kinetic energy for small N as a temperature lapse rate.

You are wilfully taking the extreme and irrelevant sub-thermodynamic case of a minuscule total number of isolated particles — in which regime the macroscopic temperature is increasingly ill - defined and no longer simply proportional to the kinetic energy per particle — and torturing it to produce something that looks a bit like a macroscopic lapse rate, but is really nothing more than a mathematical artefact of absolutely no significance.

The internal kinetic energy is taken as the upward long wave energy flux at the top of the atmosphere, and the potential energy is the upward radiation flux from the surface.

Additionally, Hawaii has ample open shoreline that can be used by ocean devices that take advantage of the kinetic energy in waves.

The molecule will first use the heat energy in expansion and on cooling will again condense and sink because heavier, and it will cool when its heat expanded volume flows to colder air which absorbs the heat, the internal kinetic energy of vibration, which if strong enough will pass that heat to another colder (which is why visible light is not a thermal energy, it is not powerful enough to move a molecule of matter into vibration, it takes the bigger heat wave, longwave infrared, aka thermal infrared called that because it is the wavelength of heat)-- that is how convective heating warms the fluid gas air in a room, by circulation, in the rise and fall of molecules as they expand and condense, not by heat energy propelling molecules to hit other molecules..

And, taking in the properties and processes of the molecule it is this real kinetic energy of vibrational motion which is heat which expands the molecule, the heat energy goes into expansion, it does not go to bouncing the molecule through empty space to hit another miles apart..

showing how EM radiation, heat and air / water kinetic energy (in cells, circulations, currents, weather systems and convection columns and so on) move and how long they have to move before they reach some kind of equilibrium would go some way to visualising why it takes time for the earth system to respond to radiative forcing (commitment time lag).

This scenario would take advantage of kinetic energy from ocean waves to power and cool their computers.