Sentences with phrase «take much reading»

It won't take you much reading to notice that the «denialist» side is largely a self - linking echo chamber that very rarely publishes anything in the scientific literature.

Not exact matches

I frequently speak about this when I lecture on college campuses, but even if you are not a full - time employee at a major company, internships will get you so much farther than any book you read or class you take.
I first read it when I was starting my business and my take aways were so different from my latest read with a company much further along.
My favourite feature is that it tells you not just how much of a book you've read, but also how many hours it will likely take you to finish.
Others develop epic mission statements, which are never truly understood, much less read, and hence fade into the background like last year's nature wall calendar you refuse to take down.
Use online tools to help calculate how much time a piece will take to read.
Many entrepreneurs read The 4 - Hour Workweek and take it too much to heart.
«Try to use compelling adjectives and phrases that evoke an emotion when someone reads your description,» she says, «without getting too carried away or taking up too much space.»
I am trying to provide you with as much info as possible still leaving my ideas still unknown do to the ammount of people who could read this and take any ideas leaving me unable to use them.
However, my philosophy in reading books is to take out as much as I can, read it with a grain of salt as is suggested, and let the rest go.
And these are all reasons why millions of Americans take out unsecured personal loans, which can typically offer much lower interest rates than... [Read more...] about Zippy Loan Review 2018 Loans From $ 100 — $ 15,000 in 24 Hours
And these are all reasons why millions of Americans take out unsecured personal loans, which can typically offer much lower interest rates than... [Read more...] about Fast Unsecured Financing Review 2018 0 % Intro APR
Reading how Mr. Buffett's life revolves around reading annual reports, papers, and trade journals, at the expense of spending time with his family, showed me how much work being a great investorReading how Mr. Buffett's life revolves around reading annual reports, papers, and trade journals, at the expense of spending time with his family, showed me how much work being a great investorreading annual reports, papers, and trade journals, at the expense of spending time with his family, showed me how much work being a great investor takes.
You could read a million productivity tips, but if you don't have the energy to take action, they won't help much.
Much of my dividend growth investing strategy has been influenced by reading other bloggers and authors and then taking what I've learned to create my own plan for investing success.
I enjoy your articles but it takes far too much effort to read your light grey font so rarely partake.
But in a week of coverage, much of which is sure to be either generically retrospective or gleefully judgmental (a Reuters article I came across yesterday made sure to note, in its final paragraph, that his papacy had been «besieged» by the sexual abuse crisis — a claim which, aside from its mild bias, is not exactly accurate), it's refreshing to read a piece that takes a longer view.
@ praise the lard have you ever considered taking a course in reading comprehension?understanding basic english would go a long way toward making you look brighter.of course in your case there is only so much wisdom to be gained, you can shuffle the bricks around but i fear you will still come up a few shy of a good load.i extend sympathy to you.
Did you know that the Gospel of Thomas is a late Gnostic text that just about anyone with an education doesn't take seriously (nor, pretty much anyone with familiarity with the Bible who has actually read it!).
Why, if you don't believe so much do you waste your time not only reading articles about Him but taking the time to comment.
The second is that when we read Thomas this way, he appears as a much more «evangelical» theologian than he is sometimes taken for.
I'm honestly sad to have read much of it — not because I know what's true and what's false, but because it makes it seem that the Christian community is willing to take a reality TV show approach to truth discovery.
God is the author of the bible and I find it much harder to take things out of context if we read and study a book line by line and chapter by chapter.
We must take communal reading and interpretations of Scripture much more seriously than American politics or other national documents.
Too often we focus upon the depth of our repentance rather than the depth of Gods love in rescuing us all, I read recently that repentance is not as much about saying sorry and turning from sin as it is recognizing what it cost God to save us and that he was the one who took the initiative and not us.
Many of these readings are very much in line with the New Testament's take on the same aspects of monotheism» of which Schwartz is, in fact, often aware.
I've taken a great interest in this and have read much on it.
These hopeful takes from supporters of abortion all commit the cardinal sin of abortion politics: reading too much into the results of isolated surveys.
Dala... Really, how much time do you think it takes to drop in, read a comment and reply, not long for me.
When i read what you wrote you gave me some strength to be what i am, in ways of expression, thanks to you i will be taking a much different coarser course in my songwriting.
Likewise, the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s changes to its policy took place over a much longer time than Azumah names, involved persons holding many positions left undescribed, and came about not because the denomination chose to ignore the Scriptures but because over time, many of us became convinced that there are theologically and historically faithful ways of reading the Scriptures that find space for contemporary understandings of homosexuality.
Reading that thing is NOT easy... thats why it stays in the closet and collects dust... i'd rather meditate and be present in the moment... its all we have anyway... The problem is we are taking SOO much time to discus what is going to happen when we die, that we don't take time to focus on how to live in THIS VERY MOMENT...
He has a take on angels, Satan, and demons which I have never heard before, and which seems to fit the biblical text in a way that, if true, would cause me to read much of Scripture in a whole different way, and which would cause me to view life, and governments, and cities, and politics, and animals, and plants and pretty much everything in a whole new way also.
Not all Christians read the Bible literally but take much of it to be collections of folktales, poetry, and history that sometimes illustrate how difficult it can be to navigate through life and grapple with the questions of where we come from, where we're going, and how we are to live in the meantime.
I would have taken your words of wisdom much better had I not read your previous post about parents and brain washing.
I will often read a lighter book, maybe even fiction, at the same time, but this causes the long books to take that much longer to read.
If you don't take the Bible at face value, then look to men like Polycarp, Clement, and Ignatius who were taught by the Apostles, and read as much as you can about these men as well as what they themselves wrote.
Heavy viewers are much more likely than nonviewers to read the Bible, pray frequently, take the Bible literally, believe «that Jesus Christ will return to earth someday,» report having been «born again,» believe in miracles and favor «speaking in tongues.»
Of course, actually finding out whats really going on would take to much work and like, reading other news outlets and stuff, so way out of Nicks ability.
As a concrete example let me read a page from the biography of Antoinette Bourignon, a good woman, much persecuted in her day by both Protestants and Catholics, because she would not take her religion at second hand.
Regardless of their denominational affiliation, they are much more likely than nonviewers to read the Bible, to pray frequently, to take the Bible literally, to believe «that Jesus Christ will return to earth someday,» to report having been «born again,» to believe in miracles, and to favor «speaking in tongues.»
First off you take it out of context, if you read ALL of it, pretty much anyone who has s e x should die, as well as a few others.
You present day christians don't spend much time in the Old Testament nor do you take time to even read the entire book.
I found a site, (Not Just Another Book) that has so much information about these verses and original manuscripts that it would take you all afternoon to read it.
Or, a much easier task, find a hundred or a thousand places where they denounce it, taking inspiration, always, from the Bible, which it was their quaint custom to read with a certain seriousness and attention.
As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.
If we are honest and we take a moment to read through them, it doesn't take much to see that everyone has broken at least one of them at some time of our lives.
Jesus most certainly is a liberal, and if anyone would take the time to read the entire Sermon on the Mount, they could see just how much He would treat most of the clergy today, like the jewish priests and scribes in that time.
IMO So much of our western church, both here in the UK and I would imagine in the US is built on the foundations of roman / greek thinking, which radically affects the approach we take on life, church, scripture etc... Have you read any of Frank Viola's work?
FAITH recognised that much was gained with the reforms that took place under Paul VI, including a richer fare of Scripture readings, revival of the Offertory procession, etc, and that what was needed was a sense of continuity, and of adherence to the authentic voice of the Church.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z