If the machine could
take old books and recycle their paper and covers and use them to print new books I think people would be really excited.
The NOOK and Kindle also have different book stores, of course, so if you're upgrading from a Kindle you won't be able to
take your old books with you — at least, not without a few workarounds.
She took an old book, gutted it, and put in brown paper.
They might read in a first - in - first - out order,
taking the oldest book from the stack.
So publishers often have to physically
take an old book and have it scanned and then converted using OCR — optical character recognition — which is far from perfect.
This book marketing strategy can help
you take an old book and transform it into a bestseller within 30 days.
Not exact matches
The Microsoft founder - turned - humanitarian is a veritable font of
book recommendations,
taking to his blog periodically to suggest new releases and
old favorites that have caught his eye.
If the
book has a whole new
take on an
old industry, sharing it with their friends will make them look smart, educated, and well - read.
«The AHCA
takes the opposite approach, so that
old and poor people will drop their coverage,» says Matthew Fiedler, an economist at the
Bookings Institution.
«This
book aims to help readers understand the habits and mindsets used to
take the company that I started at 15 years
old and turn it into one of New York's fastest - growing public relations firms.
«If you
take it off company - wide, you're
taking off things you need,» says Jeff Olson, 43 - year -
old co-founder of Velocity Business Publishing, a
book and e-
book publisher in Bristol, Vermont.
In his
book Old School, Tobias Wolf's semi-autobiographical character
takes the time to type out quotes and passages from great
books.
When asked if their
old firms» male culture led them to go off on their own, Fonstad stated that it has been challenging at times and mentioned that she's experienced some of the «penalties women
take for being aggressive and tough» that were highlighted in Sheryl Sandberg's
book, Lean In.
It
takes faith to believe (as I stated before) that a 2,000 year
old book has more correct Science in it than modern Science textbooks.»
Well, if it comes down to holy
books, the
oldest of the scriptures — the Rigveda of India has a
take which is very different and much more in accordance with what science is finding:
And it would
take considerably more than words in a 2,000 year
old book to convince me.
Meanwhile we have believerfred that has his oh so supernatural god that can change the natural laws of the universe at whim; why because it says so in a 2000 year
old book of myths, so there
take that.
I
took the
book to my boss and told him that I was NOT going to read that to five and six year
old children.
Ben... sorry to disappoint you, but I just can't
take seriously anything that a person who believes the earth is only 6000 years
old because they read it in a
book says.
Chesterton's Autobiography is not always a reliable source; but there is corroborating evidence for these protective feelings from his childhood onwards: and since this evidence is virtually unknown, it is probably best here to
take this opportunity to publish it for the first time (much of it will appear in my forthcoming
book Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy, though I discovered some of it too late for it to be included) rather than repeat
old arguments.
Throughout the
book she
takes it for granted that the «
old dogmatic literalistic myths» must go, indeed have gone; the only question is what «we» will replace them with.
To
take literally passages from an
old relic of a
book, written by man many millennium ago, and interpreted once again, by mortal man since, is rudimentary and without any credibility.
As Lasch has observed elsewhere in his critique of Sheehy's
book, negotiating the crises and «passages» of one's life simply by shedding
old selves, not panicking, and
taking on new interests denies the human need to grow to maturity through continuity with one's
old selves and the people of the past.
You are very weak - minded to really
take at face value a 2000 year
old book filled with 3000 year
old stories, when there isn't one iota of proof that ANY «god» at all was behind those writings.
I'll
take my personal relationship with God over some be-suited hilligan screeching fables at me out of some dusty
old book any day.
Save in the tenth
book of the Rig - Veda, the Vedas in general, like the
Old Testament,
take the gods for granted.
period; and from the fact that of all the canonical
Old Testament writings, only Esther yields no trace among the Qumran Dead Sea Scrolls (which date from the second century B.C. and later) we may be justified in
taking Esther as the latest canonical
book.
My
book was called When God Pled Guilty, and I was basically arguing that just as Jesus
took the sins of the world upon Himself on the cross, so also, somehow, the violent portrayals of God in the
Old Testament is God
taking the sins of Israel upon Himself through the testimony of inspired Scripture.
After this mode of understanding Jesus and the Church
took root it was a short step to label the Jewish Bible as the
Books of the
Old Covenant; nor was it long before the Christian literature was called the
Books of the New Covenant, or simply the New Testament.
Recently, I picked up one of my
old text
books — from the only religion course I
took on the subject — and reread the chapters about Luther and Calvin, so it's fresh in my mind.
If you
took the time to do the research on your religious
books, you would also know that it's plagiarized off of other,
older religions combined with the principles for religious rule written down by Plato 400 years prior to the «New God» and the New Testament.
And some of the comments on these sites have
taken a page right out of Maranatha Campus Ministries»
old book.
The
book told the story of how Anthony was
taken to China when he was four years
old to be schooled in Kung Fu techniques, subsequently winning world championships and later becoming a bodyguard in Cyprus where he was convicted of theft and converted to Christianity in prison.
The biggest non-fiction
book of the year opens with a Bible verse, and
takes its title from one of the
Old Testament's most iconic stories.
Not being a nutter myself, I really couldn't care less what is written in some
old book of myths, but I would have expected these people to
take note of Leviticus 19 - 28.
You present day christians don't spend much time in the
Old Testament nor do you
take time to even read the entire
book.
Walter Brueggemann brilliantly compacts the complexity of this idea into a dense but enlightening few sentences in his
book Old Testament Theology: «The rich field of metaphors utilized [in the
Old Testament] must be
taken altogether without being homogenized.
So I encourage others who are struggling with tough questions about Christianity to
take advantage of online resources and
books and also to seek out new friendships in their community without abandoning the
old.
- the cultural relativity argument which assumes that «the Bible is an
old book from a different culture, so we can't
take it seriously in the modern world.»
Micah told the story of how he
took a graduate course on Joshua and Judges in which the professor, on the first day of class, went around the room and asked each student why he or she elected to study these two
Old Testament
books.
Markos, all you are doing is
taking these verses out of context.the four verses that you mention are constantly used by people who hate islam to distort the true meaning.First of all, you need to post the entire chapter and it's interpretation to put it into context.You can't just
take one verse out of a chapter with a couple of hundred verses and use it as proof that islam is a violent religion.The quran was revealed in small segments during the life of prophet muhammad and wasn; t revealed all at once.There is a long story to these verses which could require an entire page to tell.look it up.EVERY RELIGIOUS
BOOK HAS TEXTS THAT CAN BE
TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT.I am sure that if I look in the jewish torah, talmud or even the bible especially the
old testament, i'll find many texts that I can
take out of context.
the reason i have an issue with this is anne rice went nuts, joined christianity, denied any bisexual or gayness in her
books, and now watch magickally it will all poof back LOL i do nt care if she wants to make every one of her vampires bisexual, but to go deny it because of religion is a bit stupid.I expect to suddenly see her
take all of that back and go back to being her
old self.i have no issue with her
taking or leaving the religion itself.
I have
taken the findings in the
old book as a firm baseline for the study of the dynamics in more recent decades.
To some degree, Gregory's
book does participate in an
older Catholic antimodern tradition, even as he
takes this tradition to new levels of sophistication.
Clear to any Biblical scholar is the truth that if it
takes work an arguement to come to one position, but a hundered literate eight year
olds can read the
book and come to the opposite arguement, then your arguement is contrived, false, and not true to the text.
Following other than the actual Holy
Books which were replaced by other books such as that happened to «Torah» into «Talmud» and Gospel» and Old Testament into some New testaments... While some Muslims had taken other than Quran as a book or adopted some informal translations or explanations that could be misguiding and where only we are able to recognize this by the use of our Fitra as a Furqan to tell which could be which otherwise if not we will become as programed robots «Brainwashed»... Interesting informative link; http://www.progressive-muslim.org/Quran-alone-and-no-hadit
Books which were replaced by other
books such as that happened to «Torah» into «Talmud» and Gospel» and Old Testament into some New testaments... While some Muslims had taken other than Quran as a book or adopted some informal translations or explanations that could be misguiding and where only we are able to recognize this by the use of our Fitra as a Furqan to tell which could be which otherwise if not we will become as programed robots «Brainwashed»... Interesting informative link; http://www.progressive-muslim.org/Quran-alone-and-no-hadit
books such as that happened to «Torah» into «Talmud» and Gospel» and
Old Testament into some New testaments... While some Muslims had
taken other than Quran as a
book or adopted some informal translations or explanations that could be misguiding and where only we are able to recognize this by the use of our Fitra as a Furqan to tell which could be which otherwise if not we will become as programed robots «Brainwashed»... Interesting informative link; http://www.progressive-muslim.org/Quran-alone-and-no-hadith.htm
In this new and interesting development, hermeneutic has, in effect,
taken the place of kerygma and a concern for an existentialist interpretation of the kerygma has been modified by a concern for the historical Jesus until it has become a concern for an existentialist interpretation of the New Testament — now seen not as a source
book for knowledge of the historical Jesus, as in the
older liberalism, but as a means whereby that faith which came to word or language in Jesus may come to be word - or language - event for us.
There are copies of some of the
oldest versions of the
Old / New Testaments (some OT
books and some NT were later
taken out about + -1500 years ago, which didn't help me at all in my search.
I «am looking for a recipe that is organic on making home made cinnamon rolls that someone may have in their grandmas
old books that will
take 2 days to make, they can be organic or not, I can change that all the ingredients to organic myself I say 2 days cause it
takes that long for the raising n stuff I had 1, n when I moved it got lost or through away, these where very hugh, n
took up to 2 cookie sheet pans or 2 9x13 pans n all I remember is it was a very very long recipe n it calls for white flour n wheat flour n with all the prepairing n getting it ready n raising n the finely cooking
took 2 days like i said can anybody out their help me with this.
This recipe is
taken from my mother - in - law's favourite cook
book which is an
old classic: Cuisine et Vins de France by the famous Curnonsky.