Not exact matches
Considering that it
took the Church about 300 years, long after they had made up their minds about theology, to start picking scripture to match that
doctrine, and that the
oldest known copt of the bible has over 27,000 «corrections» written all over it, how can you be sure that the New Testament isn't full of false
doctrine to begin with?
One hates to make
old arguments, but if this education teaches (as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar
doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can
take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?
In
taking this position I do of course raise a very
old question in the
doctrine of the ministry, the question of whether the minister's authority to preach the Word, administer sacraments, and act as pastor inheres in his office and ordination or whether it inheres in his person and is dependent upon his faith.
But, generally speaking, we can say that the
doctrine of the last things was gradually worked out from
taking with utmost seriousness, and even with a stark literal understanding, much in the later
Old Testament documents, as well as what the teaching of Jesus, then of St Paul and St John and the rest of the New Testament, was supposed to have said.
His adoring friendship with Freud (Viggo Mortensen)
takes on the contours of a father - son relationship and, as Jung outgrows the
older man's strict
doctrine, the very Oedipal complex that Freud proposed as the core of human psychology.
When you
take criminal law in law school, you learn about the «castle
doctrine,» which is named after the centuries -
old saying that «a man's home is his castle.»