Sentences with phrase «take on covered entities»

If law firms take on covered entities as clients that give them access to PHI, attorneys must comply with all the relevant regulations.

Not exact matches

These regulations shall take into account the total number of tons of carbon dioxide equivalent of greenhouse gas emissions for which a covered entity is demonstrating compliance temporarily, and may set a limit on this amount.

These regulations shall take into account the total number of tons of carbon dioxide equivalent of greenhouse gas emissions for which a covered entity is demonstrating compliance temporarily, and may set a limit on this amount.

The BootCamp ™ focuses on the most pressing issues facing Covered Entities and Business Associates today, instilling in its attendees the steps your organization can take to not only comply with HIPAA, but how to create an overall cybersecurity risk management program that enables your organization to manage information - related risks.

In practice, because the law penalizes covered entities that don't hop to it on takedown requests but has no penalty for ignoring counter notices, covered entities generally just take stuff down when asked with no requirement of proof.

The regulation does not specify the form that the program must take, but requires that it be «designed to perform the following core cybersecurity functions:» (1) identify internal and external cyber risks by, at a minimum, identifying the Nonpublic Information stored on the Covered Entity's Information Systems, the sensitivity of such Nonpublic Information, and how and by whom such Nonpublic Information may be accessed; (2) use defensive infrastructure and the implementation of policies and procedures to protect the company's Information Systems and the Nonpublic Information stored on those Information Systems, from unauthorized access, use or other malicious acts; (3) detect Cybersecurity Events - which are defined broadly to include «any act or attempt, successful or unsuccessful, to gain unauthorized access to, disrupt or misuse an Information System or information stored on an Information System;» (4) respond to identified or detected Cybersecurity Events to mitigate any negative effects; (5) recover from Cybersecurity Events and restore normal operations and services; and (6) fulfill all regulatory reporting obligations.

The exception exists only to the extent the covered entity has taken action in reliance on the authorization.

The covered entity only is required to receive and document a complaint (no response is required), which we assume will take, on average, ten minutes (the complaint can be oral or in writing).

As discussed above, we require both the requesting and the disclosing covered entity to take privacy concerns into account, but do not inject additional tension into the on - going discussions.

The covered entity is expected to take reasonable steps based on knowledge of where the information has been disclosed, how it might be used to cause harm to the patient or another individual, and what steps can actually have a mitigating effect in that specific situation.

This requirement allows individuals to exercise some control in determining recipients they consider important to be notified, and requires the covered entity to communicate amendments to other persons that the covered entity knows have the erroneous or incomplete information and may take some action in reliance on the erroneous or incomplete information to the detriment of the individual.

In exceptional circumstances, where even this informal discussion can not practicably take place, covered entities are permitted to make decisions regarding disclosure or use based on the exercise of professional judgment of what is in the individual's best interest.

We proposed to allow individuals to revoke an authorization at any time, except to the extent that the covered entity had taken action in reliance on the authorization.

(ii) If the request for access is for protected health information that is not maintained or accessible to the covered entity on - site, the covered entity must take an action required by paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section by no later than 60 days from the receipt of such a request.

Upon receipt of the written revocation, the covered entity must stop processing the information for use or disclosure, except to the extent that it has taken action in reliance on the consent.

For small health care providers that are covered health care providers, we expect that they will not be required to change their business practices dramatically, because we based many of the standards, implementation specifications, and requirements on current practice and we have taken a flexible approach to allow scalability based on a covered entity's activities and size.

Comment: Some comments suggested that a covered entity that had compiled, but not yet disclosed, protected health information would have already taken action in reliance on the authorization and could therefore disclose the information even if the individual revoked the authorization.