Sentences with phrase «take ot»

(Please don't take this OT).

Does that mean I should take ot more mortgages.

Therefore, if you believe the Vikings need to take an OT with their first pick, they would be wise to trade up in the second round to take Miller or trade down in the first round to take a higher quality OT.

Now some teams will still take that OT high because of need, and less teams need a C, however these C can play G and would make very versatile interior OL.

In that case I take the OT.

It's pretty much only the Hasidim and select idiot Baptists who take the OT at face value.

Wait, you're not taking the OT at face value are you?

Taking an OT with the goal of having him play OG could be a strong idea.

Other than concerns at RT, another justification for taking an OT high would be as a potential backup to Bahktiari should he get injured.

I think the likely scenario has us taking an OT with the first pick in the 2nd round.

If the BPA is OT, not G, say in round two — and we took no OL in round one — I'm taking that OT and either moving him inside to Guard or playing him on the right side and kicking Collins back to Left Guard.

If there is no G or C worthy of 21, then they can gamble a little more by taking an OT is there is one worthy of the pick.

I'm not taking ot doing anything different now that I'm done conceiving.

«If somebody has seen 8 Mile, this movie takes it ot the next level in terms of where that genre of battle rap is now,» Larsen said.

(Dr. Steig my apologies for taking this OT, I believe the point I wish to make is Dr. Muller's, the CRU - NASA and UEA effort is just a start.

Not exact matches

I was mostly a # 3 for quite a long time, although I really wasn't selective about the OT bits left in or not (I know most taking the # 3 approach still want to keep the Ten Commandments, in particular), but I was happy to do away with the whole thing.

Jesus himself says he has come to fulfill the law meaning the sum of the OT regulations have been taken care of Jesus» life and death.

And also, if the OT prophets were so good, how is it that such a commonplace prophecy, like Jesus's entry to Jerusalem on donkey takes prophetic priority over such major events as the Last Supper or the Foot Washing scene, an event that at least one commentary listed as one of the most important symbolic gestures ever made by Jesus.

Those who take «the bible» as the literal word of god would do well to study the factual history of the compilations of ancient stories of the OT and NT that they cherish.

Vic has insisted on dumping bible bile on us today by the truckload, so it's time to take a look at what is really in his Christian book of nasty, from both OT and NT:

Take a look at these fine examples just from the bible, from both its foul testaments, especially the OT in this case for Jewish folk in this latest bloody battle series.

Does that mean the throw away the ten in the OT, given by what seems to be a very hateful, spiteful and jealous god, and take up the free - thinking «god loves you» hippy who claims to be his son?

ot trying to take sides (yet) but to see if we can get a productive discussion going.

He seems to have a different take on the OT than you — but then again, he must not be a Reel Crischun (tm), right?

This mysterious Gospel reading is punctuated by references which, taken together and with the OT as background, point to the presence of God.

I'll try to relax and think of some of the other verses that they had in the that book of Fermentations that used to come after Lamentations before they took it out of the OT.

Their sins were covered by the OT animal sacrifices, but not taken away until Jesus» work on the cross.

p - z, since you are referencing the Christian book of nasty, AKA the bible, let's take a closer look at the horrors of that book, in both OT and NT:

Once His sacrificial death and resurrection occurred those in the OT who had faith in God had their sins taken away, but not before then.

All seemingly turned from God except Noah / God repents / and saves a core group to start over / trying to protect His children is a common theme in the OT / I don't know much of resistance or pacifism, but if you tried to harm my grandaughter I would probably respond with whatever it took.

God allowed the OT saints to «write checks» through the animal sacrificial system, but it was Jesus» death and resurrection that put the money into the account and actually took away their sins.

The taking away of the sins of OT saints didn't occur until the cross.

And I think I will take the opinion of a Hebrew Bible scholar who has dedicated years of his life to the study of Judaism and the OT over some guy who is disgruntled because he desperately dislikes the author and wants to slander him.

I can't go along with the thought that Yahweh's commands in the OT (assuming we take them as genuine commands) are a model for anything today.

I am going to have to write some posts about OT violence sometime... I have a slightly different take on it.

Our motivation might have been to please a higher diety, but it also perfectly meshed with our own morals (that circuarly was also attributed to god) but if you take a look from a historical perspective, there are reasons why there are some laws in the OT.

I, personally, ain't got what it takes to explain the OT to you, but there is a wonderful book out there that might address a LOT of your questions.

that the babies would have had a better life HERE??? ARe YOU saying they are not in a better place?????? WHAT is your problem with GOD taking the babies ot heaven???

If you want to see «immoral» take a really close look at what the supposedly all - powerful Judeo - Christian «god» did to human beings throughout the bible, especially the OT.

They can't see the basic human psychology in stories about a being (or beings) who have power over good and evil, who has the ability to give ot take life, to forgive or to condemn, to create heaven or hell.

Although I in no position to speak authoritatively for God, my own belief [based on my reading of the OT Prophets] is that God is probably a lot more concerned with what goes on in America's [and the rest of the First World's] boardrooms than S / He is with what takes place by non-coercive assent in our Nations» bedrooms.

And then, if you disagree with my interpretation re the OT and NT, ask yourself how it is that your «god» couldn't come up with a better way to communicate than a book that is so readily subject to so many interpretations and to being taken «out of context», and has so many mistakes in it.

the OT people are like toddler human beings — I want it, I take it... by physical force if necessary — and the God they believe in is like the adult in the Nursery — there, as far as they believe, to sort out the problems in their favour.

By the way, I agree with your comment on jc knowing the prophecies, and the NT being written, around 200bce, 1st, and 2nd centuries to «seem» to coincide with the OT books, is exactly what the jewish writers did not realistically (jc) compared jc to horus, and isis the zodiac sun gods (Egyptian stuff), but they the hellenistic jewish writers twisted a few things, changing the OT, adding, and taking away, which was warned to us not to do in Deut.4: 1 - 4, but these are YHWH enemies taught in Psalms 83.

Good to know and supports conclusions of others who take the time to peruse outside the box of the OT / NT.

is exactly what the jewish writers did not realistically (jc) compared jc to horus, and isis the zodiac sun gods (Egyptian stuff), but they the hellenistic jewish writers twisted a few things, changing the OT, adding, and taking away, which was warned to us not to do in Deut.4: 1 - 4, but these are YHWH enemies taught in Psalms 83.

I thought you don't use the OT cuz the NT was supposed to take over?

Really, take a look at the awful things that your god demands of you or does to poor creatures in the Christian book of horrors AKA the bible, both OT and NT:

Robert Brown, since you are constantly shoving bible quotes at us, let's take a look at the awful things that your god actually demands of you or does to poor creatures in the Christian book of horrors AKA the bible, both OT and NT:

Christians have become so infatuated with taking their marching orders from the OT of late... They have become «Old Testament Christians»... without realizing that the New Testament was something * NEW *.