It's a model (so it ai nt the truth) but it a nice one to illustrate the point you make about emerging systems of influence that are rapidly
taking over the fossil fuel industry.
Not exact matches
BOSTON, March 28 - A member of a Harvard University oversight board made a rare public call for the school to divest itself from
fossil fuel stocks, a move that shows continuing divisions on the issue as a new president
takes over at the institution and its leading $ 37.1 billion endowment.
Over the past decade and a half, countries around the world have
taken unprecedented steps to shift their energy dependence from
fossil fuels to alternative resources.
So, if Inhofe lets money dictate his policies, what does it mean that the top three contributors to his campaign are dirty energy companies (Koch industries being # 1), or that he has
taken well
over $ 1 million from the
fossil fuel industry since 1999?
After Greenpeace revealed that Willie Soon has
taken over $ 1 million in payments from
fossil fuel interests on «research» intended to undermine climate science, his credibility has evaporated.
When trees in vast forests died during a time called the Carboniferous and the Permian, the carbon dioxide (CO2) they
took up from the atmosphere while growing got buried; the plants» debris
over time formed most of the coal that today is used as
fossil fuel.
Osprey Lake of the Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN) in the United States, where the battle
over the Keystone XL Pipeline and the development of the Alberta Tar Sands is raging, addressed the failure of the COP to deal with the central point of ending
fossil fuel extraction: «With the COP
taking place in Peru, it is the first time a UNFCCC meeting was held in an Amazon country.
In addition, in Table 1 of the referenced source, only about 50 % of the estimated emissions from
fossil fuels over the nearly 200 year period from 1800 to 1994 (given in petragrams Pg) is
taken up by the oceans, disregarding estimated and highly uncertain source emissions from land use.
You can see this pioneer effect in the growth of CO2 mixing ratios from a bit earlier than 1800 to maybe 1900 when
fossil fuel burning
takes over.
The potential for efficiency remains enormous, and given the likely improvements in technology and changes in societal norms
over the next century which it will
take us to do the right thing, we are likely to be able to cut
fossil fuel use further than most people imagine possible, even if renewables don't become commercially competitive (which wind is already, and solar is in certain situations).
Similarly, we hope you will
take steps to transform our energy economy so the otherwise nearly inevitable eventual war with China
over fossil fuels can be avoided.
The transition away from
fossil fuels will
take some time, but
over the last year and a half, we have already
taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy industry.
Recently, there has been a renewed focus on how much money Willie Soon has
taken from
fossil fuel companies for his «research» (
over a $ 1 million dollars).
UN Climate Change News, 28 April 2018 — Projects that increase bicycle use
over fossil -
fuel - burning vehicles can now earn carbon credits, thanks to a decision
taken by the Board that oversees the UN's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).
If we allow
fossil fuels and CO2 to be labelled a pollutant with a view to the world's energy supply being
taken over and rationed by a «well meaning», self appointed, so called elite then we will deserve what we get.
That major
fossil fuel producers are now following the global trend should be
taken as the most emphatic evidence yet that the switch to renewable sources of energy is,
over the long term, irreversible.
In addition to the work in the World Energy Outlook, the IEA has provided input to the G - 20 and APEC since 2009, when G20 leaders
took a major step toward reforming energy subsidies and committed to «rationalize and phase out
over the medium term inefficient
fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption», the IEA has provided input to the G - 20 and APEC in support of their commitments.
Global average temperature spiked at
over 1.5 °C in February, and already another 0.5 °C is locked in once we stop burning
fossil fuels unless we
take additional actions to counteract that.
We've crossed this epic milestone just weeks ahead of the Global Divestment Mobilisation, when people all
over the world will be
taking action to highlight the moral urgency of cutting ties with the
fossil fuel industry and pushing their institutions to divest.
I have
taken the expected sharp drop in population growth into account and have estimated that the per capita use of
fossil fuels would continue to increase, reaching a 30 % higher level by 2100 compared to today (it grew by 20 %
over the past 40 years).
The Michigan power company is planning to float 30 year bonds to cover renewable energy and energy efficiency investments, while
taking other steps to favor continued reliance on
fossil fuels over renewable energy.
Our local councils invest
over # 14 billion in the
fossil fuel industry, but already there are nearly 50 local groups and campaigns
taking action to divest local government, with more springing up every month.
We know our calls to keep
fossil fuels in the ground were heard loud and clear — by world leaders here in Bonn and by people like you all
over the world who pledged to
take local action.
The global
fossil fuel industry faces a loss of $ 28 trillion in revenues
over the next two decades, if the world
takes action to address climate change, cleans up pollution and moves to decarbonise the global energy system, according to European broking house Kepler Chevreux.
So, if Inhofe lets money dictate his policies, what does it mean that the top three contributors to his campaign are dirty energy companies (Koch industries being # 1), or that he has
taken well
over $ 1 million from the
fossil fuel industry since 1999?
Among those who have
taken some interest in addressing climate change, there have
over the last decade or so been discussions about whether a focus on curtailing the activities of the
fossil fuel industries or a focus on reducing demand for
fossil fuels is the right single or leading method to move society into a transition away from
fossil energy.
Biomass is a renewable energy source not only because the energy in it comes from the sun, but also because biomass can re-grow
over a relatively short period of time compared with the hundreds of millions of years that it
took for
fossil fuels to form.
Fossil fuel companies have enough carbon stored in reserves to
take us well
over the 2 - degree threshold.
They are increasingly facing resistance from governments concerned about pollution and climate change; the United Nations is
taking the position that
fossil fuels must be put out of business
over the next thirty years or so, which will reduce their revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars every year, and the simultaneous loss in stranded assets is calculated to be up to $ 100 trillion.
While Trump's rolling back a policy that may have loomed
over coal producers in coming decades, it's going to
take more to overcome market forces and raise demand for the
fossil fuel to a level that'll put miners back to work, coal executives and analysts say.
Although variable renewable energy sources were critical to European society for some 500 years before
fossil fuels took over, there were no chemical batteries, no electric transmission lines, and no balancing capacity of
fossil fuel power plants to deal with the variable energy output of wind and water power.
We have repeatedly heard claims from tech sector companies
over the years about efforts to reign in business associations from the inside, to counter their
fossil fuel patrons and get them to
take a more reasonable position.
According to a recent private report seen by Newsweek from the multinational banking and financial firm HSBC, «The speed of the collapse in energy prices
over the past three quarters has
taken the
fossil fuel industry by surprise.»
People all
over the world are
taking action to demand Japan stop financing
fossil fuels and halt the Batang coal project.
All
over the world,
fossil fuel companies have a violent history of doing whatever it
takes to reap their profits.
The 50 per cent drop in oil price
over the past year is none other than a very intentional effort to
take off the table very expensive
fossil -
fuel exploration and projects that will not be viable with lower prices.
«It is certain that GHG emissions from the burning of
fossil fuels and from land use change lead to a warming of climate, and it is very likely that these GHGs are the dominant cause of the global warming that has been
taking place
over the last 50 years.»
«It is certain that GHG emissions from the burning
fossil fuels and land use change lead to a warming of climate, and it is very likely that these GHGs are the dominant cause of the global warming that has
taken place
over the last 50 years»
Lest you have doubts that renewable energy won't be able to
take over from
fossil fuels: A new report from NRDC looks at future energy usage in Michigan and comes to the conclusion that through a combination of renewable energy and energy efficiency improvements, the state can easily meet future power needs: Energy Efficiency Could Save State $ 3 Billion by 2030 The report, A Green Energy Alternative for Michigan, was written by Synapse Energy Economic for NRDC and shows that simply making energy efficiency improvements to offset
fossil fuel usage the state could save $ 3 billion
over the next 20 years.
A
take over will signal that the United States is serious about transitioning off of
fossil fuel.
All told, 155 elected representatives in the 113th Congress have
taken over $ 51 million from the
fossil fuel industry that's driving the carbon emissions which cause climate change.
Striking each of those down will
take ages, and means disrupting the
fossil fuel - centric culture that has persisted for
over a century.
To many, the thought of people in a town of just
over 82,000 — in a county of only 200,000 —
taking on the
fossil fuel industry in a local fight with global implications might sound a little, well, ambitious.
But then I went on to envisage, at least in my own mind, a time when large
fossil fuel generators had all closed own — mainly in order to avoid ruining our one and only habitable planet — and that the 24/7 power supply would be a mix of Solar PV, solar thermal (eg CSP), wind and the lesser sources such as hydro, tidal, geothermal etc having
taken over the complete electricity supply — especially since Australia doesn't have, and is almost certain never to have, nuclear fission plants.
«All
over Europe and the world people have
taken to the streets to call for the real solutions we need — and will carry on putting pressure on governments to shift our economies away from
fossil fuels.»
But the truth is a lot more complicated than a talking point, something which a Dutch advertising watchdog has recognized as it
takes two
fossil fuel companies to task
over misleading ads about natural gas being the «cleanest of all
fossil fuels.»
Over 800 Canadians, organized by Greenpeace and 350.org,
took action outside a Kinder Morgan facility in Burnaby, B.C. as part of the international Break Free from
Fossil Fuel movement.