Sentences with phrase «take risks on titles»

I do believe companies will need more consumer support to take risks on titles as the market continues to fluctuate.

Not exact matches

Similar to independent sales reps in the United States, these folks usually work on a commission basis, and because they don't purchase (take title to) the product, they don't assume any risk or responsibility.

Each game introduced new technology, just as today's shooters typically do, but the creators took what appears to be big risks to today's thinking by spinning each out into its own new title, rather than continuing them on under one established umbrella.

I think it is cowardly that a manager of Wenger's calibre doesn't want to take on the risks, pressures and responsibilities that comes with spending big on quality players, completing the squad and having players that put you in a position to strongly (and legitimately) challenge for titles.

By far the best article I have ever read on this site, there was no bias or empty statements, just cold hard facts, the writer even respected wengers budget but still pointed to where he should've improved, there are no excuses, what you read is literrally all u get with arsene, if you gave him a budget of 9m or 1 billion, he will ALWAYS take the risk cause he doesn't give a fk about the consequences as if he was a teenager raging through puberty, his stubborn is absolutely pathetic, can you believe he turned down signing a keeper when almunia was shocking, can you believe he didn't sign a CB when squillaci was awful, can you believe that he REFUSED to sign a CDM for almost 8 years, CAN you believe on one of the most important transfer windows of arsenals history, arsene decided to go host charity matches in rome, that's right instead of trying hard for the fans that have respected him and pay him one of the highest managerial wages in the world, he decided to do what he pleased as usual, cause he doesn't answer to anyone, nor does he giving a flying fk, gazidis a man i thought was also a crook went and did arsene's job for him and at least got us a striker (which cost us the title in january last season) and arsene foolishly proclaims that «if i was here we wouldn't of signed danny» meaning we wouldn't of had ANY recognised cf till giroud recovered, arsene wenger is a joke of the highest order, lack of respect, lack of shame and lack order, i despise him

JM took on an Inter team that had just won 3 consecutive Serie A titles — not really a high - risk or courageous move, and no - one will persuade me that Wenger could not have collected some silverware there in similar circumstances.

In turn, it remains to be seen whether or not Valverde takes any risks with rotation to rest key players, but with the Champions League no longer on their schedule, he'll surely be working around the Copa del Rey final while looking to secure the title in the coming weeks too.

If Wenger does take risk, should risk it on bigger name — not at above average penalty box poacher like Martinez / Higauin or potential young player like Lacazette We have a top squad — the second half run is title wining form — keep the squad intact and injury free is the top priority

With a potential title challenge on the cards, Arsene Wenger simply can not take risks with his squad depth, especially between the posts!

One of the frustrations, especially for writers of non-fiction and self - help titles, is that the industry wants to see clear numbers on an author's reach of influence and audience before taking a risk on his work.

Because this book is based on the quote which DOES use the word «stupid» I decided to take a risk and title it Farkle Shark, You Are Not Stupid — even though I know that many families do not allow the word «stupid» to be used in their home.

And hence that wiggle room is made exponentially larger if the titles they bring in, the ones that they're going to risk, if they're going to take a chance on a title, if that title's returnable, suddenly that risk is not so risky, right?

One of the key problems that has arisen under US lending and subscription models is that publishers who are willing to take the risk on an experimental lending model have rightly been cautious about participating, often resorting to testing the waters with their backlist or a few midlist titles.

Until now, a typical print run of a title has been a gamble for the publisher, who wants to not only meet consumer demand while not producing greater output than necessary; the bookseller, too, was taking a significant risk on placing too many copies of a title on the sales floor and potentially losing valuable sales space at the same time.

Stocking an independent title means taking on a degree of risk that most booksellers aren't willing to accept, so these unfavorable terms have long been a barrier to getting indie books on shelves.

Sure, publishers have to give more to these authors to get them to sign on, but they are willing to do this because the are taking virtually no risk on the title or the author.

I thought indie - bookstores would be the natural place to start pitching my self - pubbed non-fiction historical research title... but as a small business, it seems they are even less likely to take risks on indie authors.

Bottom line: Not only are you risking your car if you take out a title loan, but you won't get a good deal on an interest rate (average APRs are around 200 % to 300 %!).

However, car title loans tend to take on customers with lower credit scores, so the lender's risk is higher.

It's definite fact,» he added, pointing to Dead Space and Mirror's Edge as examples of titles that took risks but received only nominal reward, an outcome he fears will lead publishers to fall back on the sequel safety net more than ever.

All the «risks» the game took really paid off as Ninja Gaiden is not only the best action game on the DS (admittedly not that difficult a title to claim) but one of the best games in any genre on the system.

From a business perspective with work - for - hire you're obviously taking less risks on the funding side of these titles, as they are usually being covered by the partner.

Well, simply put, they feel, like I do in my less forgiving moments, that the success of things like Call of Duty is leading publishers to finance a whole slew of «safe sequels» — games they can rely on to bring in a tidy profit — rather than taking risks with their revenue and funding a wider variety of more interesting or different titles.

Secwepemc Territory, Kamloops, The Indigenous Network on Economies and Trade (INET) pioneered an Indigenous risk assessment of Kinder Morgan Canada's Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP), demonstrating that failure to take into account Indigenous jurisdiction, title and land rights constitutes too great a risk for large projects seeking access to Indigenous lands and resources.