Update 1: I'm just looking for a specific point (if it exists) that states that the in order to avoid liability isp has to
take some specific action against a subscriber who is downloading.
I'm just looking for the specific point that states that the isp has to
take some specific action against a subscriber who is downloading.
Not exact matches
I love this post at Rage
Against the Minivan, because it details
specific action steps you can
take if you want to be part of the solution.
On Monday, city Public Advocate Bill de Blasio called on the NYPD to
take action against sexual assaults — specifically in parks — by compiling and publishing data
specific to assaults on park land.
Parliament is going to have to tackle the
specific matter of whether
action should be
taken against those who may have lied to it.
This isn't the first time Amazon has
taken this kind of boycott -
action against a publisher for not agreeing to its terms, but it's also not the first time any book retailer — online or otherwise — has refused to stock, discount, sell, or promote a
specific publisher's works.
According to Bankruptcy Basics, an overview of the United States Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy discharge «releases debtors from personal liability from
specific debts and prohibits creditors from ever
taking any
action against the debtor to collect those debts.»
The answer for this can be found in Oklahoma Statute, title 12 Section 95 that says that a person has two (2) years to bring their
action against another for
taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including
actions for the
specific recovery of personal property.
Here are some steps on how to
take action against Breed
Specific Legislation:
This excellent, well - organized reference discusses the origins of diseases in pets, then moves on to
taking action against specific ailments such as cancer, leukemia, allergies and arthritis through use of holistic medicines.
With Maryland's repeal of the Tracey v. Solesky ruling, perhaps we will see more cities and states
take action against discriminatory breed
specific policies.
«The panel finds that Justice Matlow participated in controversial political discussions, inappropriately used the privileged platform of judicial office, publicly offered legal advice and criticism,
took a role in litigation that was likely to come before his court, communicated with the press in the course of advancing a
specific point of view in a legal and political dispute
against a party that was imminently to appear before him in litigation, and failed to ensure that his
actions and the extent of his involvement in the dispute with that party were disclosed to his co-panelists [on Divisional Court] and to the parties,» said the panel.
The chief of police is required to assign
specific tasks to the police staff and
take action against the suspicious people and activities.