If the defendant refused to
take the breath test after being advised pursuant to the statutory language by the police of the one - year sanction faced for a refusal (and the jail risked for a refusal where the defendant has prior refusal or DWI convictions), the first - offense sanction for so refusing is a civil offense carrying one year of no driving and no restricted driving privileges.
Not exact matches
After reportedly smelling alcohol on Daley, deputies asked him to
take a
breath test, but he refused.
A Forestville woman was arrested on a daytime DWI charge in the Town of Hanover
after running a stop sign and refusing to
take a
breath test, according to the Chautauqua County Sheriff's Office.
The hearing must be requested within 15 days of the
breath test request, otherwise, the suspension automatically
takes effect 45 days
after the
breath test.
RESULTS: The judge concluded that the first
breath test — without which no arrest and no second
test would have
taken place — was
taken too quickly
after Mark started driving.
Mark politely admitted to having consumed two beers that evening, and was arrested by the officer
after taking a
breath test.
When Mark was released from the police station, he was notified that he had been charged with Over 80
after taking two separate
breath tests which revealed his blood alcohol content to be over the legal limit.
Where the defendant has no prior DWI convictions, the magistrate —
after finding probable cause that the defendant violated the DWI law — will suspend the defendant's driver's license for seven days, whether or not the defendant refused to
take the
breath test.
The driver requested a second
breath test which the officer allowed but
after a couple of
breath attempts that did not produce any valid results on the ASD the officer
took the ASD machine away and served the driver with a Notice of Driving Prohibition based upon the first FAIL result.
After this telephone incident, the man
took his second
breath test, which again registered over 80.
After he
took the first
breath test upon arrival at the station and blew over the limit, he was handcuffed to a bench outside of the
testing room while he waited for the second
test.
After the police officer detected an odour of liquor on Client's
breath, Client was required to
take a roadside screening
test (also known as an Approved Screening Device or «ASD»).
R. v. Manchulenko (M.) 2013 ONCA 543 Civil Rights — Right to counsel — General — Denial of — Evidence
taken inadmissible The accused was acquitted on alcohol related driving charges
after the trial judge excluded the evidence from the two
breath tests (Charter, s. 24 (2)-RRB-, because of a breach of the accused's right to counsel (Charter, s. 10 (b)-RRB-, prior to the first
test.