Sentences with phrase «take the matter to court in»

The trademark for the «Monte Carlo» nameplate apparently lies with a clothing and apparel manufacturer from Punjab that took the matter to court in order to stop the automaker from using the name.

An agreement to take the matter to court in the US has been reached at a crypto conference in Moscow.

Not exact matches

A mandatory arbitration clause in her 11 - year - old employment contract prevented her from taking the matter to court, but her legal team circumvented the matter by suing Ailes personally.

«But every assault should be taken care of in a court of law, and to accuse — no matter who it is, a man or a woman — without evidence, it's damaging and it's unfair.»

All this takes me back to questions I raised in a prior post about the impending confirmation hearings of Solicitor General Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court: Does religion matter?

Trump has previously said he would be willing to take the matter to the US Supreme Court in order to get the travel ban passed, a measure his administration argues is necessary of national security.

With scant grounding in constitutional text or tradition, court majorities took it upon themselves (usually over strong dissents) to remove a number of matters from legislative and local control.

There is no Muslim court to take care of divorce, adoption, and inheritance, as in other Muslim countries; all these matters are now handled in the general courts.

Richard Posner, a judge of the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in a New York Times op - ed co-authored December 2 with Law Professor Eric Segall, takes Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to task for threatening America with a «majoritarian theocracy» because of his repeated dissents, since Lawrence v. Texas, against the expansion of homosexual «rights» as a matter of Constitutional solicitude.

When the soldier refused, citing a Supreme Court ruling that states there was no requirement to pray in public ceremonies, the officer then took the matter to the platoon sergeant, who also told the soldier to bow their head for uniformity purposes, according to Patrick Jones, a Ft. Jackson Public Affairs Officer.

As always I'm aiming to put in good performances if given the opportunity to take to the court; selection for the World Youth Cup is nearing and each performance matters.

In most cases, a group of unhappy homeowners doesn't have the financial resources to take the matter to court, so they often must settle for making enough noise to gain some accommodations that will lessen the sting of having a water park, a teen center, a bike path or a major grocery store facing their back yards.

The Argentina case is a very unusual one, rooted in Argentina's earlier difficulties (which led it to accept rather unusual conditions in the first place) and many states objected to the approach taken by US courts in this matter.

While the matter was taken to the House of Representatives and a public hearing was fixed for it, a coalition of lawyers, however, filed a suit asking the federal high court in Abuja to stop the house from conducting the hearing — a prayer the court granted.

The CDD in a statement reminded that the EC took the matter to the Supreme Court, ostensibly to bring finality to the many suits at the courts, challenging its decision to disqualify a number of presidential aspirants.

«We urge the court to pursue this matter to a satisfactory conclusion by taking the case forward as required by the provisions of the Rome Statute, and ensuring a thorough investigation and prosecution of suspected perpetrators of grand corruption in the electricity sector in Nigeria,» he added.

Second question: Even though this matter is in court and I don't want to go into it, the fact of the matter is that the reply, when we took the matter to court, was that the government was not involved in the demolition and they don't know who demolished the house.

It, therefore, comes as a surprise that INEC, which was a party to the matter, can not advise political parties on the right course to take but, instead, continues to encourage politicians to embark on illegal actions through active participation of its officials, who are sent to observe such illegal primaries, whereas the apex court in the land has ruled on such matter.

Having realised that the court order and its implications would negatively affect its ability to carry out its constitutional mandate, the Commission took immediate steps to vacate the court order and for the matter to be heard and determined expeditiously, while staying action on the process in compliance with the order.

It is on the basis of the above that when on the 25th of April, 2018, the Senate invited the Inspector - General of Police to appear before it on the 26th of April 2018, in respect of the felonious offenses for which Sen. Dino Melaye was taken into Police custody, investigated and arraigned in a Court of Competent Jurisdiction in Lokoja, but because the Inspector - General of Police was on official assignment with the President of Federal Republic of Nigeria to Bauchi on same date, he delegated the Deputy Inspector - General of Police, Department of Operations, Assistant Inspector - Generals of Police and some Commissioners of Police conversant with the matter to brief the Senate.

Ikanya, who called on the police to investigate the matter, said, «The Attorney - General of Rivers State, Chinwenwo Aguma, SAN, had boasted that since the police had refused to produce Dr. Lloyd, they (the prosecution) would ensure that Lloyd appeared in court to take a plea «their own way» and six hours later, the country home of Lloyd was bombed and razed.

«Now when this piece of legislation was in our books, my friend and colleague, Martin Kpebu took this matter up to the Supreme Court... and the Supreme Court said that piece of legislation is unconstitutional.

Judge Dora Irizzary instructed the parties to notify the Court immediately of any action that is taken by the Department of Justice and / or the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia concerning the pre-clearance process as well as by the New York County Supreme Court in the matter of Cohen, et.

However, due to the respect the IGP has for the Senate, that when on the 25th of April, 2018, the Senate invited the Inspector - General of Police to appear before it on the 26th of April 2018, in respect of the felonious offenses for which Sen. Dino Melaye was taken into Police custody, investigated and arraigned in a Court of Competent Jurisdiction while the Inspector - General of Police was on official assignment with the President of Federal Republic of Nigeria in Bauchi on same date, that he delegated the Deputy Inspector - General of Police, Department of Operations, Assistant Inspector - Generals of Police and some Commissioners of Police conversant with the matter to brief the Senate.

Five providers that didn't pay the expensive licensing fees were sued by BPP in 2000 and took the matter to court.

In doing so, YOU GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO GO TO COURT to assert or defend any claims between you and the Company (except for matters that may be taken to small - claims courtTO GO TO COURT to assert or defend any claims between you and the Company (except for matters that may be taken to small - claims courtTO COURT to assert or defend any claims between you and the Company (except for matters that may be taken to small - claims coCOURT to assert or defend any claims between you and the Company (except for matters that may be taken to small - claims courtto assert or defend any claims between you and the Company (except for matters that may be taken to small - claims courtto small - claims courtcourt).

That law has four key provisions: 1) every child, no matter how disabled, has a right to a free and appropriate education, which can take place in either a public or private setting; 2) an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) must be designed for each child in consultation with his or her parents; 3) the child should be educated in the «least restrictive environment»; and 4) parents can object to the educational provisions for their child by requesting a «due process» hearing with an independent hearing officer, whose decisions can be appealed to the courts (see sidebar).

Tolle took the matter to the Supreme Court, which concurred with the lower court's ruling and issued its own opinion in early Court, which concurred with the lower court's ruling and issued its own opinion in early court's ruling and issued its own opinion in early 1973.

All of this talk about Samsung being taken to court over infringing patents and copying the design of the iPhone and iPad and losing in the process, apparently doesn't matter to those wanting to make a quick buck or two.

Like all legal battles in the courts it can take months if not years to resolve the matter.

In the U.S., as a practical matter, no one can take away a creditor's right to a contracted interest payment (or other cash payment) unless that individual so consents or a court of competent jurisdiction, usually a bankruptcy court, suspends that payment.

Lapeer County Sheriff's Detective Jason Parks said the dogs were brought in by their owner, a 45 - year - old man, and authorities will seek to have the dogs destroyed if he relinquishes his rights to them or they will take the matter to court if he fights to keep them.

Is the Court reluctant to take a position in a matter that is currently under discussion between Switzerland and the EU, i.e. the so - called «institutional issues» relating to the Swiss - EU Agreements?

The Court rejected the position taken by 19 out of 20 Member States who submitted observations to the Court, and once again supported the view that EU Member States are required to act jointly first in matters which may affect the EU legal order.

On the matter of public interest, the court took the view that the claimant in his actions and attempts to justify them had ignored or failed to give any proper weight to other aspects of the public interest.

Taking into consideration the lack of evidence in the record of this case with regard to the landlord's knowledge of the vicious propensities of the dog, the conflicting studies about how best to control the dog bite «epidemic» mentioned herein, and the problems inherent in defining what constitutes a «mixed - breed» pit bull, the matter of creating a new standard of liability is fraught with problems and is beyond the sphere of resolution by any appellate court.

In my respectful view, Conforti (Re) accurately reflects the proper approach to be taken by the court when asked to characterize «income» (or «property», for that matter) under the Act.

Lightfoot is committed to pro bono work not just because it is the right thing to do and an essential part of our professional obligation as lawyers, but also because pro bono matters allow our new lawyers critical opportunities to take responsibility in court and with clients to gain valuable experience early in their careers.

The wife had also taken various steps to obtain temporary orders in the Ontario court, relating to custody and access, and had chosen not to start a custody case in Alberta until steps were taken to fix a trial date for the divorce and related matters in Ontario.

F. Award to Petitioner * reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred herein; OR Order that each party shall be solely responsible for their own attorney fees and costs except that if Respondent takes any unreasonable positions in this matter, Petitioner shall be entitled to an award of his / her attorney fees and costs; and G. Grant other such relief as the Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.

When sentencing an Aboriginal offender, courts must consider: (1) The unique systemic or background factors which may have played a part in bringing the particular aboriginal offender before the courts.To do this courts are to take judicial notice of such matters as the history of colonialism, displacement, and residential schools and how that history continues to translate into lower educational attainment, lower incomes, higher unemployment, higher rates of substance abuse and suicide, and higher levels of incarceration for Aboriginal peoples.

In any event, however, to most effectively avoid finding themselves in the same position as the employer in Strudwick, employers should take care to abide by their human rights obligations and to avoid acting in a manner that may be negatively construed by the courts when carrying out any employment - related matteIn any event, however, to most effectively avoid finding themselves in the same position as the employer in Strudwick, employers should take care to abide by their human rights obligations and to avoid acting in a manner that may be negatively construed by the courts when carrying out any employment - related mattein the same position as the employer in Strudwick, employers should take care to abide by their human rights obligations and to avoid acting in a manner that may be negatively construed by the courts when carrying out any employment - related mattein Strudwick, employers should take care to abide by their human rights obligations and to avoid acting in a manner that may be negatively construed by the courts when carrying out any employment - related mattein a manner that may be negatively construed by the courts when carrying out any employment - related matter.

He told the Star that he's hearing more and more stories of it taking much longer now to schedule civil and family matters in Superior Court — cases which do not carry the same constitutional right for a trial in a reasonable time.

It is recognised that it is unlikely that this power will be widely used as by the time the matter has reached the courts, the relevant enforcement authority may have taken action, in the form of Improvement and / or Prohibition Notices / Orders, and / or the defendant company may have addressed the failures themselves to ensure the future safety of their employees.

In doing so, this assists the client and their advisers in deciding whether it is worth taking the matter to court and, when acting in a formal Expert capacity, to give independent opinioIn doing so, this assists the client and their advisers in deciding whether it is worth taking the matter to court and, when acting in a formal Expert capacity, to give independent opinioin deciding whether it is worth taking the matter to court and, when acting in a formal Expert capacity, to give independent opinioin a formal Expert capacity, to give independent opinion.

Before taking new matters into account based on statistics which have not been considered in the judgment under appeal, the adversarial process requires that the court ensure that the parties are given an opportunity to deal with the new information by making further submissions, oral or written, and allowing, if requested, fresh material in response.

In the circumstances, the Court of Appeal took the view that: ``... save perhaps in exceptional circumstances, the court should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.&raquIn the circumstances, the Court of Appeal took the view that: ``... save perhaps in exceptional circumstances, the court should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.&rCourt of Appeal took the view that: ``... save perhaps in exceptional circumstances, the court should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.&raquin exceptional circumstances, the court should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.&rcourt should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.&raquin principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.»

However, Dr Sanchez - Graells argues that when the case reaches the Supreme Court on appeal «[e] ven if the parties do not challenge or even raise to the UKSC's consideration the matter of the (ir) reversibility of an Article 50 notification, it is a logical given that the UKSC needs to take a stance on this point in order to be able to rule on the case».

What we witness without a whimper from the media, the courts, or the bar is a prosecutor charged with the highest professional duty to see that every accused, no matter how guilty, obtains a fair trial, and who, instead, in this historical instant, has voluntarily taken steps to see that such a right becomes little more than a sad, distant echo of a justice system that once set the standard for the world.

This would be a means of recognizing in our most fundamental law that Quebec existed in our country as a distinctive part of it with unique needs in such matters as language and culture and that courts would need to take the existence of this «distinct society» into account when analyzing provisions under constitutional challenge.