Sentences with phrase «take the points here»

Despite a strong display from the Canaries, it was the champions who took the points here, thanks to Diego Costa's winner.

Comedy and references to classic 80's movies and gaming trends take point here, and they help Jazzpunk stand out as one of the most unique gaming experiences of the year.

Kazuma Kiryu takes point here as he returns to society after a few years in jail to discover things are slightly different and out of control.

Both are great, but Samsung takes the point here, as bigger is always better in the display round.

Not exact matches

Again, in case you don't want to take my word on this, here are some articles you can read that support this point:

You'll encourage a culture of empowerment by saying any job is here for the taking and simply pointing to the board when someone asks: Hey!

The final clause here involves a situation where an employee's job evolves to the point where they are no longer doing the same job (see section 1) as when they were hired because certain key responsibilities have been taken away from them.

«Rosie Assoulin is a designer we love here and I loved that we could take a quick Snapchat [of her work recently] and put on an emoji or some line drawing and point out exactly what we like [about it].

Regardless, the point here is that business owners can still take action to lower their tax bill.

The key point here is that effective delegation is about placing your focus where it matters most, and letting others take care of tasks you shouldn't be doing.

Here are the key points of the updated debt sustainability analysis, which takes into account the events of recent weeks.

Spoiler Alert I'm taking some direction from Chris Brogan here and I'm going to share my most important point up front.

So at this point you've heard of Bitcoin, maybe you've visited weusecoins.com or read up on Bitcoin here on cryptojunky, yet still haven't taken the dive and tried Bitcoin out.

The lesson want to point here is this: «never forget the values that took you to the top.»

The point I want to make is although breaks above the price - related obstacles that are currently being challenged won't give us useful new information, it won't take much additional strength from here to effect upside breakouts that really do mean something.

Check out the full podcast interview here: How to Become a Sales Engineer Here are the key points discussed on becoming a Sales Engineer: It's important being able to take an idea and sellhere: How to Become a Sales Engineer Here are the key points discussed on becoming a Sales Engineer: It's important being able to take an idea and sellHere are the key points discussed on becoming a Sales Engineer: It's important being able to take an idea and sell it.

First, the «returns on equities» here are typically taken to be earnings yields, which as we've frequently noted, are affected by cyclical variations in profit margins that make them notoriously poor indicators of long - term prospective returns (see Two Point Three Sigmas Above the Norm and Margins, Multiples and the Iron Law of Valuation).

If I played the same game as you and took the number of Muslims killed by American ammunition, bombs, cluster bombs, missiles, sanctions, depleted uranium, etc., etc. and divided that into numbered points featuring the victims in groups of 50, 60, or 100, I'd be giving you a MUCH longer list of Muslim victims of America than the list of victims of Islamic terrorism that you provided to us here.

Dear I know nothing would happen on earth with out the will of God... what ever happened or where ever prophets and messengers were before were sent to earth is not the issue since God said in the Quran that he God took the convent of all the prophets before sending them to call their people into worshipping God only and not to mislead people into worshipping them instead... This is the point here that the message was that (God is One and Only Nor he has a Mate or a Son or any Partners among Mankind or Jinn or Angels)...

Every clip shown on here was either taken out of context or edited to fit the point.

Well, I take your first point, black on black crime isn't the issue here.

My point here is that we need to take our social location very seriously, to be suspicious of ourselves, and to work constantly to correct for the bias that our location introduces.

@ CQ: 1) as Kevin DeYoung pointed out less than a week later on this blog (an entry here and a longer linked article on his own blog), that article («My Take: What the Bible really says...») was rife with poor exegetical scholarship.

My point here is not to take sides with any of these speculations, but only to indicate that the initial insistence on locating humanity fully within nature, heightens the marvel of creation that is too often lost when we stay within our dualistic compartments.

More will be said on the Biblical view of man later, but it is sufficient to point out here, that it is just because the Bible hardly anywhere reflects a doctrine of an immortal soul, that the Christian hope took the form of the resurrection of the body.

Here at the outset let us take care to make it clear that the question of an historical point of departure arises even for a contemporary disciple; for if we are not careful here, we shall meet with an insuperable difficulty later (in Chapter V), when we come to deal with the case of the disciple whom we call the disciple at second hHere at the outset let us take care to make it clear that the question of an historical point of departure arises even for a contemporary disciple; for if we are not careful here, we shall meet with an insuperable difficulty later (in Chapter V), when we come to deal with the case of the disciple whom we call the disciple at second hhere, we shall meet with an insuperable difficulty later (in Chapter V), when we come to deal with the case of the disciple whom we call the disciple at second hand.

I shall not delay the discussion here to defend Bergson against his critics, except to point out that what is frequently termed «irrationalism» in Bergson is precisely what he has in common with all modern disciplines that take the dimension of depth seriously.

Here, the Holy Father took the opportunity to explain, once again, his choice of papal name, while using that exercise to make two important points.

I suddenly realised that here we are, all trucking along, but it's just like Strictly — at some point, I'm afraid, the judges will take us out.

The point here is that the mixing of races, which has always taken place, makes nonsense out of racist theories, which presuppose the possibility of some simple racial identification.

Colin says it best, but lets be clear here, as long as the bible is even remotely taken seriously when it comes to making laws, hiring decisions or really any decision that has any bearing on my life whatsoever, I'll be there to point out just how ridiculous the bible is.

To front - load the story by saying people were being treated in animal stalls, and only later point out it was a free clinic held in a county fairground (rural area, large crowd... likely the only suitable place that passed health and safety requirements for such an event), and to not mention that many if not most of those taking advantage of the free medical care were likely farm workers and not here legally... is beyond poor reporting.

They probably just took the 10 most basic questions and put them on here in an effort to emphasize their point of the story.

God's receiving the world's achievements into his own everlasting life; God's remembering for ever that which is thus received; God's using for further good the achievements which have taken place in the created order — here are points which need to be emphasized when we begin to think of the worth or value of human existence.

Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz

Many will choose to stop reading here because they've figured out where I'm going but that shows the unwillingness to consider any other option, which is the same fault that you complain about; I ask that you take just a moment to consider my point of view.

I explore ways in which Jacob's work reflected life as it was in the beginning in my booklet Work and the Christian Family.3 Here, though, we take as our starting point the text from the third chapter of Genesis that focuses on the entry of suffering into our family relationships.

We shall here take up one or two preliminary points about the historicity of the burial story.

Prof. Arnhart has elaborated on this point at a conference we both attended, so I might as well take the opportunity here to quickly rebut this argument.

(We may note here a point which will be taken up later.

The point here is to show how seriously Whitehead takes the relation of the dominant occasions, which constitute the soul, to the organism over which they preside, while refusing simply to identify or merge soul and body.

Here are ten simple points to remember as we move toward November, and then we can take questions and talk about anything you like.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

(There is something to be said for taking it as a subjective genitive, but the point need not detain us here.

He has pointed out that a theology which is strictly confined to the world of «here and now can not take account of the ultimate questions which men must ask, whereas every sound Christian theology is required indeed to speak of that «here and now», but to relate it to God as a creative principle and to see God at work in the immediacies of human existence in the whole range of what we style «secular existence».

Interesting point of view in all takes of religion, here is an interesting video on Flexidox Judaism, an interview with Rabbi Gershon Steinburg - Caudill from Empirical Magazine.

The atheists here don't know the Bible and I seriously doubt have any gay friends much less real friends so they speak not from any caring point but to take The Bible out of society.

I'm not anti-stuff but I think the points made here are well taken and the church in North America needs to start paying attention to — that means me.

My point here isn't to take one last shot at Romney.

My point here is not to make dogmatic claims about what will ever be scientifically or technically possible, but to suggest once again the Hall's own vision of the future may take too seriously the self - image of some technologists as practitioners of a purely rational and completely formalizable activity.