And if necessary, they can
take your case to trial as well.
Not exact matches
Such crime if it
took place any where in our Islamic lands and was caught for the crime... he will be torn
to pieces there and then with out
trial since
trials are supposed for those who are suspected and not proven guilty... but
as a
case that is
as plain they should have condemned him
to worst death with out any need for court
trials... But by being soft on the issue and giving ear
to such junk you open doors for those copycats whom seek fame... That is only fair and secure..
«The criminal assault
trial of Kevin S. Parker, a state senator from central Brooklyn, was thrown into turmoil on Thursday,
as a judge granted the Brooklyn district attorney's office's request
to have two special prosecutors appointed — one who would
take over the
case, and another who would investigate possible improprieties by an assistant district attorney.
Updated 3:26 p.m. The criminal assault
trial of Kevin S. Parker, a state senator from central Brooklyn, was thrown into turmoil on Thursday,
as a judge granted the Brooklyn district attorney's office's request
to have two special prosecutors appointed — one who would
take over the
case, and another who would investigate possible improprieties by an assistant district attorney not directly involved in the proceeding.
The challenge
takes on even more urgency with recent developments, including a federal administration now more open
to exploring the potential of stem cells, the recent FDA approval of a human
trial involving embryonic stem cells,
as well
as the reported
case of a young boy who developed a brain tumor four years after receiving a stem - cell treatment for a rare genetic disorder.
Ben Gazzara (who passed away earlier this year) is the defendant, a hot - headed army officer arrested for murder, and Lee Remick, Arthur O'Connell and Eve Arden co-star, with rising star George C. Scott getting a «featuring» credit for a small role and a brilliant performance
as a big - city attorney who steps in
to take over the state's
case late in the
trial.
Finally, the day has arrived: the
trial of Larry Henderson is beginning at last, and
as we're assured in the opening moments of the proceedings — by which I mean the episode, not the legal proceedings — there hasn't been a
case of this magnitude in town since the East Peck Witch
Trials of 1994... and I'd tell you
to take...
As I dug deeper I was struck by the sense of outrage and loss this painting aroused in so many people: The family of Lea Bondi, determined
to reclaim the stolen portrait she had failed
to recover in her lifetime; the Manhattan District Attorney who sent shock waves through the international art world and enraged many of New York's most prominent cultural organizations when he issued a subpoena and launched a criminal investigation following the surprise resurfacing of Portrait of Wally; the New York art dealer who tipped off a reporter about the painting during the opening of the Schiele exhibition at MoMA; the Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security who vowed not
to retire until the fight was over; the art theft investigator who unearthed the post-war subterfuge and confusion that ultimately landed the painting in the hands of a young, obsessed Schiele collector; the museum official who testified before Congress that the seizure of Portrait of Wally could have a crippling effect on the ability of American museums
to borrow works of art; the Assistant United States Attorney who
took the
case to the eve of
trial; and the legendary Schiele collector who bartered for Portrait of Wally in the early 1950s and fought
to the end of his life
to bring it home
to Vienna.
The new AGFS proposals include: · Fees based on the seriousness and complexity of the work done, · Restoration of separate payments for PTPH, sentence and mentions, · Restoration of payment for the second day of every
trial, · Payment of # 300 for
trials which become ineffective, · No more arguments over the service of material
as evidence, · A near four-fold increase in offence categories
to capture the seriousness and complexity of
cases, · Restoration of career progression — earnings increase
as the work becomes more challenging, and · Encouragement for advocates with the necessary skills
to take on more complex
cases.
An accused who was previously eligible for a lenient sentence or who had racked up considerable pre-sentence custody could throw in the towel and make peace with Her Majesty but is now encouraged
to take a shot at
trial even where he assesses his own chances of winning the
case as poor — if you're getting slammed by a mandatory minimum whether you plead guilty or not, you may
as well spin the wheel of justice and see what happens.
When
cases involving self - represented litigants do reach
trial, they tend
to require more adjournments and
take longer
to resolve
as a result of self - represented litigants» unfamiliarity with the rules of court, the rules of evidence and the law that applies
to their
cases, and the results self - represented litigants achieve tend
to be worse than the results they would have achieved had they had counsel.
I've always seen Oatley Vigmond
as a firm that shared my belief that properly representing the injured means having an earned reputation for
taking cases to trial — putting the gowns on.
For that reason, is it fair
to use
cases that no lawyer would have
taken anyway
as an example of what's broken in the tort system or
as a basis for criticizing
trial lawyers?
As one example of a defective product
case, our firm and another law firm
took a
case to trial that resulted in a $ 19 million verdict in our client's favor.
If the
case goes
to trial, this can mean that the lawyer pays
to take depositions,
to copy documents for discovery, copy documents that will be used
as evidence, prepare exhibits, pay medical experts and pay other experts
to provide valuable information about the
case.
A good
trial lawyer will begin
to prepare your evidence for court
as soon
as he agrees
to take your
case.
Ideas include: 1) writing about a recent news story
as it relates
to your practice areas, 2) writing about new
cases as they are issued and include your
take on the
case, 3) writing about another blogger's recent post and provide an opposing, or alternate, viewpoint, or 4) answering questions about the legal process that clients typically ask you, such
as what types of information they should bring
to the first appointment or how long a jury
trial might last.
At Rawa Law Group, we know that most
cases are won in the courtroom, which is why we prepare every claim
as if it will be
taken to trial.
Because of how the principle of judicial independence is interpreted by courts, the original
trial judge in this
case could not be asked why it had
taken 9 months
to reach a verdict, and could not be questioned whether the delay was due
to the complexity of the
case, the judge's workload, or other personal reasons, such
as illness.
Our Bowling Green lawyers have decades of experience
as trial attorneys and have no problem
taking your
case as far
as they have
to so you get your fair share.
Our traffic accident lawyers can help you out in a settlement or
trial As it is possible that your traffic accident
case could
take any course once your KC traffic accident lawyer has filed a claim, you need
to make sure that your attorney has the relevant experience.
While our medical malpractice attorneys try
to maximize compensation and resolve
cases as expediently
as possible for our clients, make no mistake that The Cochran Firm, D.C. will
take your
case all the way
to trial if that is what is necessary
to secure justice.
Although we do not
take every
case to trial, we prepare every
case as if for
trial, often uncovering crucial information that brings opponents
to the negotiating table.
More specifically, the
trial court might well have proscribed extrajudicial statements by any lawyer, party, witness, or court official which divulged prejudicial matters, such
as the refusal of Sheppard
to submit
to interrogation or
take any lie detector tests; any statement made by Sheppard
to officials; the identity of prospective witnesses or their probable testimony; any belief in guilt or innocence; or like statements concerning the merits of the
case.
As such, our dedicated team knows first - hand what it
takes to successfully prepare a
case for
trial, and understands the sense of urgency that may be inherent in your requests.
Many states have established what is known
as «drug court» programs charged with serious drug offences under the supervision of a judge who aim
to rehabilitate the accused (usually are repeat offenders) instead of
taking the
case to trial.
Law firms should encourage associates
to take on pro bono
cases, allow them
to serve externships in district attorneys» offices, sponsor or provide
trial - skills training and bring them into the courtroom
as second chairs.
«It failed
to take into account that oftentimes, counsel do know what they're doing, the direction that a file is
taking, the time that it's
taking, and there [could be] multiple good reasons
as to why a
case wasn't set down for
trial or even sometimes why there wasn't a statement of defence,» says Murray.
We
take an aggressive stance, always assuming the
case will go
to trial -
as seasoned and established litigators, we are more than comfortable handling complex
cases in court.
Patrick is an experienced litigator and
trial lawyer who has regularly
taken cases through
to trial and arbitral hearings, with extensive experience in complex commercial litigation (including international arbitration and other cross-border disputes),
as well
as trademark and patent disputes, trade secret theft, and regulatory investigations in a broad range of industries.
We will fight for our clients because we are known
as a firm that has
taken so many
cases to trial, we now find that in most
cases our clients receive fair offers which avoid the need for a
trial.
This means that he develops his
cases as though they are going
to trial, and
takes a hard nosed approach with opposing counsel.
Buckley says that in many
cases, NLRG will act
as a consultant
to attorneys through the whole
trial process, advising them on whether or not they should even
take a
case and then helping them draft pleadings, arguments and briefs.
Whether you choose
to take the alienation of affection
case to trial or
to use it
as leverage against your spouse in a divorce agreement, we stand by your right
to fight for what's fair.
The fact that the governing presumption at law is the presumption of resulting trust, and not the presumption of a gift however, has direct implications
as to how and whether the
case can be settled given the litigation risk of
taking these actions
to trial..
An attorney from our firm can assist you with every aspect of your accident claim, from gathering evidence such
as police reports and witness statements
to prove that the other party was not only driving drunk but also caused your accident,
to negotiating with the insurance company over the value of your claim and even
taking your
case to court for a full jury
trial should this prove necessary.
We will treat your
case as if it were our own and will not hesitate
to take it all the way
to a
trial in order
to help you obtain justice.
As a real - life example, the e-book examines in detail the recent high - stakes patent
case between Apple and Samsung and
takes a close look at the
trial exhibits that both sides introduced, from the point of view of how convincing they were likely
to be
to a jury.
Robert & Maya: «When receiving
case papers and associated
trial documents, the Crown along with other investigative bodies (such
as HMRC, the NCA and the SFO) is now
taking a position whereby they will only send electronic copies
to a secure CJSM email account.
As a full - time litigator, Scott has been involved in the
trial of some of the largest
cases taken to trial at Keesal, Young & Logan.
In order
to get your
case settled, we
take on each
case as if it will proceed
to trial.
Once the above 4 steps are completed, you and your spouse will need
to take the next court steps such
as setting down a Notice of Application, Attending a Judicial
Case Conference, booking a
trial date, etc..
As a skilled litigator, he has the experience and skill
to take your
case to trial to protect your rights and interests.
As dedicated defense lawyers, we at Coyle Law Firm
take cases to trial when needed.
These types of accidents can be devastating, and you will need an attorney who is experienced in high - stakes negotiations with insurers,
as well
as taking complex injury
cases to trial.
We
take every
case with the approach of
taking it
to trial, which allows us
to prepare our clients
as well
as our strategies
to the fullest extent of the law.
As experienced
trial attorneys, we are always ready and willing
to take your
case to court
to protect your rights.
We
take every action necessary
to maximize your workers» comp settlement and prepare every
case as if it might be heard at
trial.
Whether your
case may go
to trial will depend largely upon the approach your personal injury attorney
takes as well
as the circumstances surrounding your
case and whether the responsible party is willing
to work with you
to reach a fair resolution.
Although the additional time that the federal judges
took to make decisions is not dispositive of the result, it adds
to the possibility that state judges viewing the heavy burden on summary judgment were and are less willing
to grant these motions
as a threshold matter and instead prefer
to let
cases proceed
to trial or settlement.112 By contrast, the federal judges who
take more time in coming
to decisions may put more weight on the summary judgment motions if they are, on the balance, more willing
to grant them.