For the text to be
taken as testimony, as relevatory, judgment must be made about objective characteristics, above all what Ricoeur calls in Interpretation Theory its «self reference,» its claims to represent an «I» or a «we» engaged in a certain past «event of discourse.
We take this as testimony of Israel's faith in Yahweh and Moses.
I'm willing to dismiss this as feel - good political talk, but it implies we don't
take this as a testimony for some West basic aim that plays a part in a contrarian counterfactual.
Not exact matches
According to a transcript obtained by The Hollywood Reporter of
testimony given
as part of a lawsuit filed against CBS in 2016, the TV judge
takes a no nonsense approach to getting what she wants.
As it turned out, 18 minutes of sworn
testimony from Redstone, presented in court Friday, was all it
took to resolve the case — but not in Herzer's favor.
1: Have no other gods — NOT A LAW = > In God we trust is on our legal currency 2: Make no graven image — NOT A LAW = > intellectual property is a God to many, we have tones of laws protecting against false copies 3: Don't
take the name in vain — NOT A LAW = > false
testimony is a crime
as is swearing in some states 4: Honor the Sabbath — NOT A LAW = > employment law in many states prohibits forced labor on religious days 5: Honor thy father and mother — NOT A LAW = > minors have limited right to transact commerce under 19.
What we have is an entire sector under the blowtorch and battling serious reputational damage
as the audience lay witness to AMP lying to the regulator, CBA awarded the «gold medallist» for charging fees for no service, planners caught
taking fees from dead people, NAB caught false witnessing documents, client impersonation, inappropriate advice, Orwellian protection policies and a witness cutting short his
testimony after collapsing.
3: Don't
take the name in vain — NOT A LAW = > false
testimony is a crime
as is swearing in some states (False
testimony is NOT the same.
It is a convincing
testimony to the power of Grace when someone is able to
take criticism
as you have; but fear of such criticism can also have the affect of making those just learning of the depth of Divine Love after years of being taught to worship a Cosmic Bully fearful of sharing their own experiences and expressions of faith.
As mystics and missionaries, heroic martyrs and courageous founders of religious orders, in public life as sovereigns or in quiet service in convent or school, the Church's women saints are testimony to the fact that Mother Church takes legitimate pride in her daughter
As mystics and missionaries, heroic martyrs and courageous founders of religious orders, in public life
as sovereigns or in quiet service in convent or school, the Church's women saints are testimony to the fact that Mother Church takes legitimate pride in her daughter
as sovereigns or in quiet service in convent or school, the Church's women saints are
testimony to the fact that Mother Church
takes legitimate pride in her daughters.
Again, proof and evidence guided by the scientific method or a preponderance of evidence weighed objectively seems to work better than
taking as «proof» anecdotal
testimony.
There are places where he resorts to the imagery of myth and speaks of Christ
as if he were living an unseen life with God in a heavenly realm above, from which he would descend to appear on the earth at the imminent end - time.38 At other times Paul could speak of the church
as the body of Christ, of which the Christian believers formed «the limbs and organs».39 He exhorted the Galatians to «put on Christ
as a garment», 40 he said to the Romans, «Let Christ Jesus himself be the armor that you wear», 41 and he told the Galatians how he was in travail until they «
took the shape of Christ».42 In various ways Paul spoke of the risen Christ
as an indwelling presence in the believer, the most moving passage being his own
testimony, I have been crucified with Christ; the life I now live is not my life, but the life which Christ lives in me; and my present bodily life is lived by faith in the Son of God who loved me and gave himself up for me.»
Bater pertinently comments, «If there was that much ambiguity about the resurrection of Jesus for the eyewitnesses, on whose
testimony all the succeeding ages must depend, do not the efforts twenty centuries later to establish it
as demonstrable and unambiguous
take on a certain comical effect?»
Deniers,
as both Lipstadt and Vidal - Naquet show, seem to have an endless supply of polemical tricks and dodges: they simply discount Jewish
testimony out of hand
as lie or fantasy; inculpatory
testimony from the Nazis themselves is said to have been coerced by the triumphant Allies; documents confirming such
testimony are said to be forgeries; Nazi statements and memoranda about the Final Solution are
taken at face value if they are euphemistically phrased, but are interpreted
as hyperbolic or figurative if they are blunt and explicit; photographs and films of executions are dismissed
as fakes.
’42 In addition, he not only transmits to us the early tradition that Christ «appeared to Cephas», but tells us elsewhere that some time after his own conversion he went «up to Jerusalem to get to know Cephas ’43 and «stayed with him for a fortnight».43 Since Paul and Peter are likely to have discussed all the important aspects of the Christian Gospel together, we can
take Paul's
testimony as the equivalent of first - hand
testimony by Peter that Jesus had appeared to him.
We
take I Corinthians 15 to be our most reliable
testimony to the resurrection appearances,
as being the only eyewitness report we have.
The electronic age with its offering of a wide variety of ways to present the human voice has commanded new attention to oral language.1 Perhaps the ascendancy of science and the domination of the scientific method has created such a restricted view of language that a reaction in favor of more dimensions to language is to be
taken simply
as clear
testimony to a general degeneration of meaningful discourse, a degeneration in which the church figures prominently.
My book was called When God Pled Guilty, and I was basically arguing that just
as Jesus
took the sins of the world upon Himself on the cross, so also, somehow, the violent portrayals of God in the Old Testament is God
taking the sins of Israel upon Himself through the
testimony of inspired Scripture.
The «fact of Jesus,» in any important and really true sense, was Jesus
as he was known and remembered in the community, and the
testimony upon which we must rely for any knowledge of this fact must be
taken as equally valid
testimony to the resurrection.
The real issue was not, therefore, «Evangelical» versus «Ecumenical», but instead, how the
testimony of those who call themselves evangelical was to be
taken as part and parcel of ecumenical life.
Chrissy from what you have written i believe you have always had a sensitive ear to God that shows obedience and godliness that is not the norm.You must of had godly influence from parents or someone close to the family.Its shows wisdom beyond your years what you know instinctively has
taken me years to learn
as my heart was stubborn and hard hearted.By your words i see humility and surrender to the Lord that is a powerful
testimony may he continue to strengthen you in your Christian walk and may you be a blessing and a witness to others who do nt know the Lord.It shows God has no boundaries he is able to reach people in any situation if they have ears to hear.brentnz
I am speaking to you by my personal experience of what has
taken place in me, I have become His
testimony unto His life
as I was
taken down to death, yet I live: Therefore; if a one does not have the Christ life in Him, He will not be able to stand in His presences, because all will fall before Him except the Christ that we have become, the carnal man can not know Him:
Others
took the view that the Gospels were not so much conscious fabrications
as the work of naïve believers living in a prescientific age: their credulity led them to misconstrue the
testimony of their own eyes.
A parade of military generals and admirals, Methodist and Baptist preachers, and yes, even a few «Reagan» Republicans each
took the stage to give
testimony as to why Trump is unfit to be president.
«We were expecting our committee allowances from the chairman, so, when we were called by our leader to come and
take our money, we
took it knowing that that is our allowance, so,
as for the quantum we can not tell how much money he [Mr Agyarko] might have given to the chairman, so, there are all sort of speculations about what sort of quantum he is alleged to have given, but what we know is what came to us
as individuals, that is what we can bear
testimony to: whether it's GHS1 or GHS2, no matter how small it is, what we know is what was given to us and we found out later that it was coming from him, so,
as for the quantum, it's not important.
He is already
taking a dreadfully long time to impart basic pieces of information, such
as the job description of a man mentioned in his witness
testimony.
Melissa Mark - Viverito
takes questions
as she leaves a Committee on Rules, Privileges and Elections meeting where she heard
testimony from the Quadrennial Advisory Commission regarding a proposed raise for elected council members.
«These actions,
as well
as testimony that Percoco required employees to obtain his permission to leave State employment and otherwise attempted to control their post-State-service employment, also demonstrate Percoco's control over State employees, making it more likely that Percoco directed State employees to
take official action,» a letter from prosecutors to U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni stated.
It did not
take long for jurors to send a note to the judge — after 40 minutes, the forewoman asked for the
testimony of nine witnesses,
as well
as various pieces of evidence, transcripts of
testimony, tapes, and even a white board.
As my
testimony indicated, I hope it's a vibrant, enthusiastic, «let's
take on the 21st century,» United States can - do kind of [legislation] rather than one that seeks to find the constraints and stiffen the sinews.
Mikulski chairs the full Senate Appropriations Committee
as well
as the Commerce - Justice - Science (CJS) subcommittee that
took testimony from Bolden today.
* Disclaimer * None of the following parts of my
testimony should be
taken as a substitution for medical advice.
I mixed it in my toner for my oiling and acne prone skin and also for stomach upset
as well
as weight - loss... it works and doesn't
take long to prove it's effectiveness... Someone mentioned earlier about the benefits of organic coconut oil... it is amazing especially for promoting weight loss and firming the body... I am a
testimony that both these natural gifts from God do work for the concerns I mentioned... be blessed..
It may
take up a lot of time, but it will save you the agony of wondering why you are not
as lucky
as those people who give
testimonies of how they found love online.
Cage reveals the same general desire to be
taken seriously
as an actor again here that was already on display in the recent «Joe» and «The Dying of the Light,» right from an early scene in which his Colin Pryce makes an emotional
testimony before Congress about the impact of the BP spill on local fishermen and tourist business.
Crawford sits there in court, sketching in his legal pad,
as damning
testimony is presented, not even
taking advantage when the judge recommends he object to one of Beachum's leading questions.
We don't have all the details yet about time and place
as the public hearing notice has not yet been posted; however, the Commission will be
taking testimony from school leaders (including board members, district administrators and school business officials) at this meeting.
Commanding
as the Huracán is in Popsicle colors, we could hardly
take our eyes off our white test car, a
testimony of the design's versatility.
When I was selected for jury duty, 20 years ago, I was the first peremptory challenge because I said that I would not
take the word of the psychologist
as expert
testimony, but rather would consider the opinion of a man on the street
as more valuable than that of a psychologist.
In collecting this passionate
testimony —
as well
as words from Wolfgang Amadeus himself — Mozartina is a glorious celebration of the music and life of Mozart
taken from two centuries of notes, quotes, and anecdotes.
As Democratic lawmakers and environmental groups continue to complain about Bush administration edits of Senate
testimony on health risks from global warming, the White House today
took the unusual step of having President Bush's science adviser, John Marburger III, issue a detailed explanation.
But if you
take the same strategy and follow the reception of uncertainty through the media, such
as the CBS broadcast on «Silent Spring,» and in the President's Science Advisory Committee policy documents, in Carson's
testimony before Congress, and in the E.P.A.'s ban on DDT, you can witness the same strategy to assert ignorance and risk, and use visceral images to transform scientific uncertainty into a political certainty.
Since then there have been numerous documentaries about climate change, each
taking different tacks to generate interest: The 11th Hour, which sexed up expert
testimony with Leonardo DiCaprio's narration; Merchants of Doubt, which explained climate denial
as a scurrilous corporate con game; and Chasing Ice, which
took cues from nature documentaries in its quest to capture melting glaciers on film.
Max, I agree fully with the excerpts from Judith's
testimony,
as I do agree with most other statements that she has
taken great care to formulate for a specific use.
Juries have heard - and been deeply moved - by his first hand authoritative
testimony to the dangerous trajectory the business -
as - usual model to CO2 emissions is
taking mankind and the planet.
Note: James Hansen's 1988
testimony took place in June 1998; this comparison used January 1988
as the starting point.
Snippable commentary, perhaps, but this document,
taken as a whole, does not read
as testimony nearly so well
as it reads
as a B - movie script.
As the pioneer of video for litigation from way back in 1975, it
took almost 5 years for attorneys to wrap their arms around how videotaped depositions enhance courtroom
testimony.
Our opponents know we have no problem
taking a case to adjudication, evidenced by our experience in confronting insurance doctors» examinations and
testimony,
as well
as confronting employers» and their witnesses
testimony.
More specifically, the trial court might well have proscribed extrajudicial statements by any lawyer, party, witness, or court official which divulged prejudicial matters, such
as the refusal of Sheppard to submit to interrogation or
take any lie detector tests; any statement made by Sheppard to officials; the identity of prospective witnesses or their probable
testimony; any belief in guilt or innocence; or like statements concerning the merits of the case.