Sentences with phrase «taken by both men and women»

In 1539 under authority of Henry Parliament passed a statement endorsing transubstantiation, the celibacy of the clergy, private masses, the observance of the vows of chastity taken by men and women, and auricular concession, and declaring that Communion in both kinds was not necessary.

This is a supplement that can be taken by both men and women.

Not exact matches

Yet before the holiday distractions take hold, donors use this time of the year to remember the sacrifices made by the men and women serving in the U.S. military, and to support causes that help them when they return home.

While the number of women - owned veteran businesses has jumped, there's one category of businesses that has taken a dive: Those that are veteran - owned equally by men and women.

The honorees will include Joanne Smith, the Chief Human Resources Officer for Delta Air Lines (No. 98 on this year's list), for helping the airline to build a more inclusive workplace by pushing it to commit to the White House Equal Pay Pledge, which encourages U.S. companies to take action to advance equal pay among men and women.

These profound changes send the message that there is no longer any tangible recognition of the risk B.C.'s women and men take when they walk away from secure jobs and pensions, to invest their savings into starting their own small business; businesses that create new tax revenues by providing employment, paying suppliers, and collecting GST and income taxes.

Simmilar to women, if Canadian employers were suddenly paying the same wages as men by rule of law, they would be firing more women, in general, women would take a fewer hours, and the man - cession term would not exist

They place greater value on the level of interest the advisor takes in providing them with appropriate advice — value is driven by the advisor taking the time to understand their needs and goals (45 % of women versus 36 % of men), being responsive to their questions (42 % versus 37 % of men) and being able to explain financial matters in an understandable way (44 % versus 33 % of men).

the christians were bad during the crusades, stirred up by Pope Urban II into going and taking land the ROMAN EMPIRE, not christianity, had lost, and these same «holy crusaders», upon taking Jerusalem, massacred men, women, children, muslims, jews, christians, everyone just because they were different.

It was Christ who encouraged the fair treatment of women... God who commands us not to neglect the poor and to feed orphans and widows... God who insisted that field owners leave part of the crop behind to be picked up by hungry gleaners... God who said men should not take advantage of one another by charging interest... Christ who attacked the Pharisees for their rigid thinking and superiority complex toward Samaritans... How are my values inconsistent with the teachings and actions of God?

It would be easy to take shelter in the categories determined by cultural and political ideologies: so - called conservative Catholics are expected to reject or downplay the urgency of environmental protection, and so - called liberal or progressive Catholics are expected to downplay marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

The Muslim jihadist who is promised the virility of 100 men to service his many young lovers, (women with nice boobs, and boys, by the way) is just taking this to a radical literalism, says Jeff.

These new expressions of faith, fed by passions of ordinary men and women, did not merely diverge from received authority; increasingly they failed even to take into account the standard theological categories that served as guides for religious experience and formed the common denominator of theological discussion between disputants.

If it should be true, as Carol Gilligan has argued, that men are drawn toward a morality of abstract justice and women toward a morality of connected webs of caring, and that neither of these taken by itself constitutes the whole of the moral realm, then mother and father together — but in different ways — may inculcate and transmit moral value and commitment.

That is where the harm comes in — when we take a definitional difference («men are, by and large, more likely to be physically stronger than women») and make it prescriptive («hey girl, let me carry that box for you because you're a woman.»).

Anyone interested in improving relations between men and women today and tomorrow must proceed by taking a page from yesterday.

It was by way of engaging with a woman taking a «feminist approach» (her words) to the abuse of women in the church using the rape of Tamar and the narrative about Lot asking those that wanted to rape the men to have the women instead as proof texts.

It is extraordinary that men and women of unusual ability in their respective spheres have rarely taken the trouble to give their adult attention to such a unique way of life as that proposed by Jesus Christ.

He took Christian unity to a new level of seriousness and was well - regarded - even loved - by men and women from Christian communities which had long regarded the Pope as an evil figure.

The most primitive instinct of a man to protect his woman will be triggered by childbirth and when he is powerless to do this, with the medics taking over, he can easily go into a traumatic shutdown reaction.

So in the first place I thought that if you were hetero then you liked women how is it that they were hetero and gay??? How do you explain the fact that they would not take lots daughters to mean that they were passing by women in favor of men that sure sounds gay to me.

My taxes pay for a lot of things that we take for granted, police officers, teachers, public schools, our highway systems and bridges, roads and light fixtures for our everyday usage and our countries defense by way of paying our men and women who are defending our lives right now both here and abroad.)

I was taught by Nums and priest to take care of my fellow man (and women).

Gothard's teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.

You can hold that a woman is so made that she enters into her sexual identity and so finds a particular fulfillment by giving cooperative support to a male leader, or that she is not; you can hold that a man is so made that he enters into his sexual identity and so finds a particular fulfillment by taking responsibility for a female helper, or that he is not; and you can argue across the board for whichever view of Bible teaching on role relationships fits in with your idea.

There again Michael you are confusing Roman culture and Greek culture... there is not fact and verifiable to your claim only random hypothosis motivated by an emotional sinful culture to change Jesus» words... instead of proof texting take all the text together they all condition that marraige is between man and woman... and unless you can have babies your arguement is futile.

Many men were taken completely by surprise when their att itudes towards women were shown to be demeaning and hurtful, and many whites hadn't realized that the names they used for other races were offensive to them.

The sad thing for me is that I know men who, if they saw my post today, would roll their eyes and say it's not true, that this violence against women thing is all a conspiracy theory concocted by militant feminists in order to take over the world.

But this was a dim and vague affair, presumably taken to be a way in which the «spirit» breathed into human life when God shaped the «dust of the earth,» as the legend in Genesis tells the story, would never be utterly destroyed — after all, it had been breathed by God and hence must be indestructible even if largely irrelevant to whatever the future, beyond death, held for men and women.

In Genesis 3, the woman usurped authority over her husband and took the lead in the Fall, and is now forbidden to do so in the local church by teaching Scriptures to men.

To take one example: women have been systematically exploited by men in all human relations and not least in the home in all Western civilization.

And being a gay man is often seen as taking on a woman's role by default, is it not?

One way of getting at the point is by considering the celibate man or woman whose specific vocation is not to act genitally but to redirect the sexual drive, desire, and equipment for other ends that are taken as good for that particular person.

And as Sean Palmer put it so well last week, «as long as the narrative continues which articulates that men lack what it takes to nurture and raise children, as long as some argue that the cultivation of children is the domain of women only, we will continue to produce dads who believe they risk their «man - card» by trying.&raqAnd as Sean Palmer put it so well last week, «as long as the narrative continues which articulates that men lack what it takes to nurture and raise children, as long as some argue that the cultivation of children is the domain of women only, we will continue to produce dads who believe they risk their «man - card» by trying.&raqand raise children, as long as some argue that the cultivation of children is the domain of women only, we will continue to produce dads who believe they risk their «man - card» by trying.»

This is very similar to the religious bigots of the past, where they took Bible passages to condone slavery, keep women down, and used Bible passages to claim blacks as curses who should be enslaved by the white man.

sorry but dorvice is wrong in some case but in some case it is not because if a woman is being beat by a man what do u expect her to sit back and take it sorry that is wrong and when a man cheats that is allow not just that there is some woman that cheats but also most of the time it is because people do nt want to wok there problems out but i think people should think before they get married

This new family ideal takes an entire book to elaborate (with important questions still left unanswered), but can be briefly summarized as follows: it is the voluntary lifetime union of a woman and a man who parent their own children in a relationship characterized by love, justice and equal regard.

19 «The priest shall have her take an oath and shall say to the woman, «If no man has lain with you and if you have not gone astray into uncleanness, being under the authority of your husband, be immune to this water of bitterness that brings a curse; 20if you, however, have gone astray, being under the authority of your husband, and if you have defiled yourself and a man other than your husband has had intercourse with you» 21 (then the priest shall have the woman swear with the oath of the curse, and the priest shall say to the woman), «the LORD make you a curse and an oath among your people by the LORD»S making your thigh waste away and your abdomen swell; 22and this water that brings a curse shall go into your stomach, and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away.»

The Gospel Coalition stood by them both, refusing to alter or take down the post, even after prominent and respected evangelical leaders — both men and women — asked them to take it down or at least amend the language.

I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....

For the eternal, uncreated second person of the Trinity truly to become man he will take on human nature by being conceived and formed in the womb of a woman, like all human beings.

Doc... I don't give a f *** what degrees you have... anyone with a normal high school education can see that the Bible was written by man on order to gain wealth, property, status, and control of everything, especially women... Man egos can't take the fact that women «ARE» their equaman on order to gain wealth, property, status, and control of everything, especially women... Man egos can't take the fact that women «ARE» their equaMan egos can't take the fact that women «ARE» their equal..

Women are impoverished by being culturally scripted to overdevelop their nurturing Parent (and thus to exist for the purpose of taking care of and pleasing «their man» and their children) and to feel powerless because they have not developed their potential Adult competencies.

We shall Know them by their Deeds — so how about all you so called Chrisitans practice what you preach — feeding the hungry, sheltering the homeless, and caring for the «lesser of these» — oh I forgot that isn't the Republican way — it's every man / women for themselves but you women will take a back seat to your Mman / women for themselves but you women will take a back seat to your MANMAN!

When I became a Catholic twenty years ago, I was profoundly affected by the men and women I met who had taken up the challenge of celibacy, individuals whose affirmative response to God's call, like Mary's yes, redounded to my benefit.

We muslims don't call our women: Bitches, hores... and the majority of muslim women actually have the choice to choose to wear the veil (if you go to a Catholic church women are asked to wear the veil... nuns are fully covered... even Marry the mother of Jesus used to cover and that is because these women know they are diamonds and you have to really deserve her to be able to see more and that is only gonna be her husband, and parents... If you have a precious and very expensive diamond in your possession don't tell me you would leave it outside of your house but you would leave your trash outside of your house... same thing with women especially and by the way this apply to men as well in Islam... A woman actually is the queen of her household, and when they are so aware of their status within her community, as more like a mother, she is committed to her husband, kids and parents exclusively... she is busy taking care of her loved ones and enjoys it and happy so why you ask her to show you her cleavage if she doesn't think you deserve her... Muslim women are not any different than all women, they only like to wear the veil and not show their beauty to you... what?

In my own experience I find it perfectly extraordinary that men and women of unusual ability in their respective spheres have rarely taken the trouble to give their adult attention to such a unique way of life as that proposed by Jesus Christ.

But when the anchor of a structure liturgy, and the sacraments is missing, what usually takes it's place is experience and emotion... all propagated by the «man» (or woman) up front.

Where in the bible does it say women can not be pastors they are just as loved by god and it does not take a man's touch to know god.

At the same time, I can't help thinking from my experience of talking with women that there is an element that serves both men and women best where there is responsibility being taken by men in leadership in some form for women not to take that is beneficial for all.