Sentences with phrase «taken by civil courts»

Is this in keeping with the approach taken by civil courts?

Not exact matches

Strange that the pedophile cases have been taken to civil courts instead of criminal courts by the families of the victims for compensation.

But civil liberties activists question why it took a court decision to force the government to remove innocent people's DNA in the first place, saying the home office was engaged in creating a universal database by stealth.

The measure, criticised by civil liberty campaigners as a «snooper's charter», has been taken out of a more general Home Office and Ministry of Justice - sponsored crime and courts bill, which ministers need to get on to the statute book as fast as possible.

«Clinical negligence» is the process by which a patient takes his medical attendants to a civil court for compensation.

Topics to be discussed include: Court Procedure: An understanding of the civil litigation process in New Jersey as it pertains to negligence claims; Damages: Understanding the standards for, and the differences between Compensatory and Punitive Damages; Facility Maintenance: Identifying potential safety hazards related to facilities and grounds, and taking reasonable steps to address common problems; Indemnification: Identifying when the school district is responsible for the actions of its employees, and when it may disclaim coverage; Insurance Coverage Issues: Understanding what is, and is not covered under a school district's insurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school districts.

Given the dissatisfaction among civil rights groups with the efforts by both the administration and congressional leaders to eviscerate No Child's accountability provisions, the unwillingness of the administration to back away from the effort, and the successful court challenges launched by those opposing implementation of the Affordable Health Care Act, it is quite likely that reformers on both sides of the ideological line will take Obama and Duncan to court.

«If children for some reason are allowed to live with third persons, their parents may demand them back by civil action in a court of law, but the court must take into account only the interests of the children and their education.

On April 11, 2012, the department filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Apple, Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster, for conspiring to end e-book retailers» freedom to compete on price by taking control of pricing from e-book retailers and substantially increasing the prices that consumers paid for e-books.

a) Disputes filed - 18 months b) Inquiries - 2 years c) Payment profile -5 years d) Information related to a consumers payment behavior such as slow payer, defaulted or absconded - 1 year e) Information relating to the action that a credit provider has taken against a consumer to enforce a debt such as handed over, legal action or write - off - 2 years f) Debt restructuring - Until a clearance certificate is given g) Civil court judgments - 5 years or until the court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt judgments - 5 years or until the court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South AfCourt order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Africa.

The change is part of a series of steps taken by the credit bureaus, which last July eliminated civil judgment records — notes that a consumer owes a debt to a court as a result of a lawsuit — from credit reports, as well as half the tax lien data they had.

Details of the suit were not disclosed in a report by Bloomberg, nor has the New York County Civil Court provided specifics about the damages Take - Two is seeking.

In January 2015 Tuymans was found guilty of plagiarism by a Belgian civil court after he used a photograph taken by Katrijn Van Giel as the source for his painting «A Belgian Politician» (2011), [23] a portrait of Belgian politician Jean - Marie Dedecker.

Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court in the case of South Carolina v. United States (Civil Action No. 12 - 203), expressed the opinion of the court that the law enacted by South Carolina «satisfies Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act,» making it permissible, but that the short time left before the 2012 elections prohibited its implementation until elections taking place in 2013.

The appeal judge took the reasons of Butler J. into consideration, and found that there were not any new issues — everything that Mr. Gonzales brought up in the civil claim had already been decided during the family matter by the Supreme Court judge.

That having been said, the Supreme Court does provide for court fees (Appendix C of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, passed under the Court Rules Act) which are borne by the parties when they take particular sCourt does provide for court fees (Appendix C of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, passed under the Court Rules Act) which are borne by the parties when they take particular scourt fees (Appendix C of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, passed under the Court Rules Act) which are borne by the parties when they take particular sCourt Civil Rules, passed under the Court Rules Act) which are borne by the parties when they take particular sCourt Rules Act) which are borne by the parties when they take particular steps.

The set of more than 50 barristers, who work as individual barristers taking personal responsibility for their cases, is led by Robin Allen QC and performs the whole range of civil court, tribunal and appellate work from the smallest claims to high profile cases in the Supreme Court and European Court of Juscourt, tribunal and appellate work from the smallest claims to high profile cases in the Supreme Court and European Court of JusCourt and European Court of JusCourt of Justice.

While the Human Rights Committee has not determined that «extraordinary» tribunals or «special» courts are incompatible with the requirement that tribunals be established by law, it has taken the position that the provision is intended to ensure that any court, be it «extraordinary» or not, should genuinely afford the accused the full guarantees of fair trial set out in Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The flaws in the justice system is the topic of Taking Back the Courts, the new book by criminal defense attorney and civil rights lawyer, Norm Pattis.

Represented client in appeal where the appellate court held that tort actions were properly brought for civil conspiracy and tortious interference for actions taken by a corporate parent to interfere with the contract involving a joint venture of which its subsidiary was a member.

When a complaint alleges a mistake by a professional that essentially amounts to an allegation of negligence — a matter that a civil court would normally adjudicate as part of a claim for monetary compensation — can a regulator decline to take action with respect to such negligence?

Germany has asked the ICJ to declare that the «Italian Republic must take... all steps to ensure that in the future Italian courts do not entertain legal actions against Germany» by allowing civil claims based on violations of international humanitarian law by the German Reich during World War II.

Germany asked the ICJ to declare that the «Italian Republic must take... all steps to ensure that in the future Italian courts do not entertain legal actions against Germany» by allowing civil claims based on violations of international humanitarian law by the German Reich during World War II.

The recommendations are designed to meet the challenges of contemporary civil caseloads by taking advantage of modern technologies and highly trained court staff to provide effective oversight and timely intervention to move civil cases to resolution.

The days when the length of the parties» relationship was measured from the date of marriage are long gone, pre - marriage / civil partnership cohabitation is a factor to be taken into account by the court under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), s 25 exercise (and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 equivalcivil partnership cohabitation is a factor to be taken into account by the court under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), s 25 exercise (and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 equivalCivil Partnership Act 2004 equivalent).

The Master of the Rolls commented that the suggestion by the court in Corner House that the Civil Procedure Rules Committee consider the matter of procedure for PCOs had not been taken up in any detail.

She found it in accordance with the Supreme Court Civil Rules «object of proportionality to proceed by special case instead of opening the door to hundreds of potential actions that would take an enormous amount of time and expense.

The committee notes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 56 on summary judgments notes that «Many courts take extra care with pro se litigants, advising them of the need to respond and the risk of losing by summary judgment if an adequate response is not filed.

Division 7 of the Civil Resolution Tribunal Amendment Act takes away the public's right to challenge ICBC's denial of accident benefits in court and instead requires «the determination of entitlement to benefits paid or payable» to go through a Tribunal not run by judges but instead Government appointed bureaucrats.

Since your insurance company has a duty to defend in the event of a civil action taken against you, your policy would likely pay for your defense in court — unless specifically excluded by your provider.

• Act as point of contact for community members looking to lodge complaints • Take people's complaints and provide them with a timeline within which investigation will begin • Investigate cases of murder, kidnapping, robbery and burglaries • Patrol assigned areas to detect possible criminal activities and interrogate suspicious persons • Investigate incidents for law violations, both criminal and civil • Apprehend and arrest offenders and law violators • Prepare evidence and ensure that it is preserved until the time it is due to be presented in court • Respond to calls to deal with emergency situations such as accidents and burglaries • Enforce traffic laws by issuing citations and observing violations • Transport prisoners to court or prison facilities • Maintain patrol cars and ensure that weapons and arms inventory is properly handled

As a result, when being sued for divorce, he is entitled under Virginia Rule of Civil Procedure 8.01 - 9 to a guardian ad litem, which is an attorney appointed by the court to protect the incarcerated spouse's rights and to make sure he is not taken advantage of during the divorce process.

NJ Court Rule 1:40 - 12 (b) 8 provides that candidates for the court's civil mediation rosters who received their training out of state of more than five years ago take a 6 - hour supplemental civil mediation training course approved by the cCourt Rule 1:40 - 12 (b) 8 provides that candidates for the court's civil mediation rosters who received their training out of state of more than five years ago take a 6 - hour supplemental civil mediation training course approved by the ccourt's civil mediation rosters who received their training out of state of more than five years ago take a 6 - hour supplemental civil mediation training course approved by the courtcourt.

(c) If an otherwise arbitrable matter is the subject of civil litigation, arbitration shall not take place unless the litigation is withdrawn or referred to the Board of Directors by the court for arbitration in accordance with Article 17.