Recent speculations in physics resulting in theories of a finite world of space - time have however been
taken by some philosophers as warrant for belief in some infinite reality «beyond» the finite world, upon which that world is dependent.
Not exact matches
My logic is sound,
by the way,
taken from Aristotle, St Thomas Aqunas and even modern day
philosophers from my days in seminary.
The pressure of epistemological standards established
by minimalistic philosophies was extremely strong at that time, and any
philosopher who wanted to be treated seriously in academic circles had to
take them into account.
The first hypothesis will be denied not only
by positivists but also
by philosophers who
take seriously the religious implications of a doctrine of God as infinite, immutable, simple, and necessary.
In recent years, the eminent mathematician and mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose has
taken up the Lucas argument, further refined it, and answered criticisms that had been leveled at it
by mathematicians and
philosophers.
Moreover, since God is not merely a construct of the
philosopher but is actually encountered
by the
philosopher, philosophy must
take this into account.
Professor Hartshorne, who has much more to say on this matter, believes that «the Christian idea of a suffering deity» «symbolized
by the Cross, together with the doctrine of the Incarnation» (C. Hartshorne:
Philosophers Speak of God, p. 15 [University of Chicago Press, 1953]-RRB- may legitimately be
taken as a symbolic indication of the «saving» quality in the process of things which despite the evil that appears yet makes genuine advance a possibility.
It reminds us that our most pressing constitutional questions (on slavery and secession) were settled out of court; that it
took more than a wiser judge to reverse our most villainous chief justice (Roger Taney); and that our Constitution's most consequential interpreter wasn't a robed
philosopher - king but a self - taught lawyer from Kentucky
by way of Illinois.
As the Socrates of Plato's Republic acknowledges the likelihood of the world continuing in its evils, he describes the
philosopher as someone who retreats from public life «like someone who
takes refuge under a little wall from a storm of dust or hail driven
by the wind» (Republic 496d).
The paper itself
takes the occasion of the publication of a book on each of these two
philosophers by Paul O. Kuntz (ANW, BR) as an opportunity for re-examining some of the interesting philosophical and historical comparisons between these two pivotal intellectual figures of our century.
This becomes particularly clear when one
takes account of certain basic presuppositions that are now widely shared
by theologians as well as
philosophers.
As a biologist I have long been immensely impressed
by and beholden to Whitehead's philosophy of organism (Process and Reality), in that it seems to me that he is the first great
philosopher who really
took trouble to comprehend the biological developments of his time.
Most of these lectures aim at bringing the insights of Hinduism and Buddhism closer to Indian and Western Christians as well as
philosophers, to deepen their understanding of faith and expand it to other forms of belief.43 His anthology «The Vedic Experience» which has been accepted and respected
by many Hindus, tries to present texts from the Veda and the Upanishads in such a way that they become open towards other beliefs and transparent for the depth of faith.44 An important aspect of his literary production, already central at the beginning, but gaining prominence again lately, has been to address a Western public that faces the challenge of having to seek its religious identity and not being able to
take it for granted.
Above all else, the edifying
philosopher takes responsibility for keeping this conversation alive, not
by «finding the proper set of terms into which all the contributions should be translated,» but
by being willing «to pick up the jargon of the interlocutor, rather than translating it into one's own.»
Lindbeck observed that in their emphasis upon the function of religious language as propositional information about objective realities, conservative theologians tend to confirm the approach to religion
taken by most Anglo - American analytic
philosophers.
Philosopher Albert Borgmann, a Montana neighbor of mine, is our most eloquent and important spokesman in exposing the dangers of letting technology determine the way we live, dictating the means
by which we, in his phrase, «
take up with the world.»
Process theology, or what Charles Hartshorne prefers to call neo-classical theology, has links with the theology of the early church fathers who were influenced
by Greek thought, Socinus in the sixteenth century and the
philosopher A. N. Whitehead of this century, who
took science more seriously than his contemporary
philosophers and theologians.
Thus Justin, the martyr -
philosopher of the second century, stated: «All those who have lived
by the Logos, i.e.,
by the eternal, divine World - Reason, are Christians, even if they have been
taken as atheists, like Socrates and Heraclitus.»
2) The second view
philosophers have traditionally
taken in light of this problem, denies that the human soldier, if
by the term «human soldier» we mean to refer to the composite of soul and body, is a single substance, and holds instead that the tiniest parts composing him are.
In his generation Aquinas,
taking account of Aristotle, enabled many earnest intellectuals, troubled
by the use made of that
philosopher by sceptics, to see that without violating their integrity of mind they could remain Christian.
In it he is trying to persuade
philosophers to
take Whitehead seriously
by separating him from the theologians.
The liberal
philosopher John Rawls described how a socially just society was one
taken by people unaware of what position they would occupy within it.
The sometimes mischievous French
philosopher, Jean Baudrillard earned himself a bit of notoriety in the wake of Operation Desert Storm
by declaring that the the Gulf War did not
take place.
The latest political
philosopher - king to
take Westminster
by storm is American journalist David Brooks, a man favoured
by President Obama.
One other view (that has not been held
by very many
philosophers) is sometimes called the growing block theory of time, which is a theory that
takes the past and present to exist but the future to be nonexistent.
This approach was
taken up in experimental work
by Justin Sytsma, a graduate student, and experimental
philosopher Edouard Machery at the University of Pittsburgh and in work
by Larry (Bryce) Huebner, a graduate student at UNC - Chapel Hill, and all of the experiments arrived at the same basic answer.
If you are a Catholic who
takes his faith seriously, i've discovered this super dating site that not only allows you to join free (so that you can have a good look around before committing yourself) but you can also down load a free eBook on love and marriage written
by one of the greatest Catholic
philosophers of the twentieth century.
«Viam supervadet vadens»
by the Roman
philosopher Lucius Seneca (English: if you really want to find your happiness,
take actions).
The complication is that Agis, since a boy, was
taken in
by philosopher Hermocrates (Ben Kingsley) and his spinster sister Leontine (Fiona Shaw), a scientist attempting to generate electricity: inveterate hermits both.
The star, Baird Whitlock (George Clooney, «Tomorrowland»), has been abducted
by a couple of extras who
take them with their true captors, a group of communist writers (led
by the epically inconsistent communist
philosopher Herbert Marcuse) that call itself «The Future.»
It's too smart for its own good, presenting a superhero origin story without allowing any of its characters to ever once even whisper the word (a lot like «The Walking Dead» making everyone look like assholes
by avoiding the term «zombie») and spending too much time letting its teen titans drop names like Schopenhauer before making it clear that the character who most embraces the
philosopher's theories of aesthetics and self - abnegation ultimately
takes up the mantle of one of Schopenhauer's offshoots, Nietzsche.
During one such visit in 1865, Elizabeth
took Millicent to hear a speech
by John Stuart Mill, a social and political theorist and
philosopher who believed in women's suffrage.
Conceived and organized
by guest curator Philipp Kaiser, UNPACKING
takes its title from German
philosopher Walter Benjamin's 1931 essay, «Unpacking My Library: A Talk about Book Collecting.»
Curated
by Séamus Kealy, the exhibition
takes its cue from the term «punctum», which was coined
by the French
philosopher Roland Barthes in his final book Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography.
In the Focus, Slovenian cultural theorist and
philosopher Renata Salecl
takes an in - depth look at Holzer's Lustmord series, which was precipitated
by the events in the former Yugoslavia and boldly addresses the atrocities committed in war.
Taking inspiration from a seminal essay
by French
philosopher Gilles Deleuze, Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation 1981, the exhibition highlights the role of Bacon's approach to space, which Deleuze interpreted as one of the defining forces of his work.
Cool Memories
takes its title and approach to a «fragmentary and messy» structure from
philosopher Jean Baudrillard's essay series, creating a space «where consciousness loses its ability to distinguish reality from its simulation» and promising «an assembly line for images, for shots swallowed
by the present that they're desperately trying to hold back.»
The night between the 17th and 18th June, Moderna Museet metamorphoses when it is
taken over
by 50 Swedish, French and German
philosophers, thinkers and artists.
Taking its title from a Jean - Luc Nancy essay, in which the
philosopher described the impossibility of community, but that community was nonetheless defined
by our attempts to create it, this exhibition brings together film and video works dating from 1968 onwards, made originally for galleries, cinemas and television.
At the same time, 80 primary school children will
take the lead
by transforming neglected sites in Margate this July after 18 months of work with local politicians, council officers, a
Philosopher, Turner Contemporary's learning team and their chosen artist.
Other writers include fellow - traveler
philosopher Laurence A. Rickels who has
taken down the Official Psychoanalytic History of Umma and Korea,
by interpreting Kim Il Soon's dreams, unlocking her «andere Schauplatz» where she unleashes a desire for Unification.
There, well - known
philosopher Dr. Henry Shue (currently at Oxford) gave an excellent and compelling talk about the (strong) moral / ethical case for
taking action to address and minimize risks such as those presented
by climate change.
Have you attempted inflicting real pain on yourself
by reading the
philosopher that
took Plato ideas to the ultimate irrationality?
When somebody arrives to twist history and clear historical facts to support his own understanding of how science progress and how it is understood
by historian and
philosophers, it is useless to
take him in consideration.
However, in his ongoing defense of this position he has failed to
take into account what Cohen and other
philosophers mean
by «intuition,» and so failed to engage the sense in which intuitions are necessary for deliberation.
Before diving into the authoritarian parenting mindset, let's
take a quick look at the pure, archetypical authoritarian personality as it was originally theorized
by sociologist and
philosopher Theodor Adorno.