Sentences with phrase «takes much concentration»

This skill takes much concentration and as is very hard for a dog to maintain for even short periods.

Remembering how a purl stitch is formed differently than a knit stitch takes much concentration and fine motor agility.

Not exact matches

But while watching, needing something that didn't take too much concentration, I pulled out the ongoing scrap blanket I haven't worked on since winter.

Once I got out, the contractions felt much stronger and it took a lot more concentration to remain relaxed and breathing / moaning effectively.

Previous work with strontium cobaltites relied on changes in the oxygen concentration in the surrounding gas atmosphere to control which of the two forms the material would take, but that is inherently a much slower and more difficult process to control, Lu says.

Treatment plants in Pennsylvania are accepting Fortuna wastewater with much lower levels of radioactivity from the company's wells there, Kessy said, but if plants can't take the higher concentrations, it could be crippling.

He noted, however, that the measurements were taken about eight inches above the water's surface, making it likely that concentrations would be much lower farther away.

Cod Liver Oil is one of the toughest one to get kids to take, but the one I notice the most difference in their mood (much calmer) and concentration when they take it.

But it does mean that we take in a much lower concentration of toxins (which we can further reduce by shopping smart).

Deficient concentration of work on the pectoral muscle because too much of the strain is taken by the deltoids.

Deficient concentration of work on the pectoral muscle because too much of the strain is taken by the deltoids (or / and biceps brachii).

According to Examine.com, the risk of nicotine and addiction is a measurement between how much nicotine is taken (with more nicotine being associated with greater risk) and the speed of nicotine reaching the brain (with faster spikes in neural concentration being associated with both greater perceived benefits and greater risk of addiction).

This doesn't cause any problems if you're just drinking the tea, but an extract taken as a supplement contains a much higher concentration than just hot brewed tea.

So much of the school was new, and creating (and then recreating) fresh practices took time, intense concentration, coordination, and a level of imagination that rarely emerges for overworked people at 2 A.M. Young teachers needed support.

There's so much power on tap that it takes concentration to refrain from making every takeoff a burnout.

Take extra care to store dry cocoa powder and baker's chocolate securely, as they contain a much greater concentration of toxins than milk or semisweet chocolate.

In her short review last week, Smith took a swipe at less focused artists: «[Horvath's] long cultivation of aspects of cartooning, overlooked art, patterning and lightweight materials found in much painting today has paid off with a combination of concentration and resonance that remains too rare.»

It is impossible to know whether or not this event would have taken place if we had not increased the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere as much as we have.

So when in the past extinction events, Co2 concentration and following large methane excursion took place it took a considerable time and it is highly likely that we experience this time a much fast feedback from the climate system.

@ 48 If your speculation is correct, I assume that another consequence would be that, if / when concentrations of greenhouse gases start to drop, corresponding reductions in surface ocean / land temperatures would take place at a much slower rate than would otherwise be the case: the surplus heat stored in the deep ocean will gradually make its way to the ocean surface, and continue to warm the atmosphere for decades, if not longer.

It used a simple mathematical model, and IPCC data, to suggest that even if CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere doubled, which might take the rest of the century, average global temperature would not rise by much more than 1 degree Celsius.

The former is actually much more stringent than the latter: oceans and ecosystems will continue to take up CO2 for a while after emissions stop, and therefore concentrations will drop to a level between that of today and that of preindustrial.

2) Given this, it takes much more than human emissions can supply simply to keep CO2 concentrations from dropping.

If my best guesses are indeed better than those of the IPCC, then climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 concentration is 0.8 K before feedbacks are taken into account and 0.7 K after feedbacks, very much in line with the results of Lindzen & Choi and Spencer & Braswell.

But even taking these into account, there is no doubt that «going nuclear» would result in a slower increase in CO2 concentrations, maybe by as much as 80 ppmv by 2100, which translates into averted warming of around 0.6 C at the arguably exaggerated IPCC AR4 2xCO2 ECS of 3.2 C (or half this amount at the more recent estimates for ECS).

I took the estimates of oceanic warming from 0 - 2000m and applied Henry's law of solubility (there's an equation on Wikipedia's Henry's law page for determining this) to see how much this would decrease the aqueous concentration of CO2.

Terrestrial photosynthesis (plants and soil) takes up over 20 times as much CO2 as humans emit, and there is evidence that this is increasing as atmospheric concentrations rise.

If we were to completely stop CO2 emissions, the concentrations of CO2 would fall of at first fairly rapidly (tens of years) but then much more slowly, taking a thousand years or more to return to pre-industrial levels.

There are two prominent and undeniable examples of the models» insufficiencies: 1) climate models overwhelmingly expected much more warming to have taken place over the past several decades than actually occurred; and 2) the sensitivity of the earth's average temperature to increases in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations (such as carbon dioxide) averages some 60 percent greater in the IPCC's climate models than it does in reality (according to a large and growing collection of evidence published in the scientific literature).

To date, much international discussion at the interface of science and politics has taken as a rule of thumb that — as a first step — global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide should not exceed approximately twice the concentrations which existed before the modern industrial era.

In fact, we have very good grounds to assume that almost half of it had nothing to do, as GHG concentrations had still not risen much when it took place.

You take a 90 % concentration of fuming nitric acid and add it to three times as much of another substance in ice, add glycerin, wait awhile, and then suction it back out of the acid.

I had so much fun creating these eggs — I love doing creative projects that take concentration and focus.