Sentences with phrase «taking a bigger risk if»

Arsenal would be taking a big risk if they did decide to cash in on both players at once, with replacements perhaps more likely to be hard to come by in the middle of the season.

But, you could be taking a big risk if you postpone finding medical insurance for yourself and your family.

If you have assets to lose, like a house or car, or a job where wages could be garnished, you are taking a bigger risk if you do not have insurance.

Insurance companies feel that they are taking a bigger risk if they offer ordinary insurance to senior travelers.

You are taking a big risk if you do not change the driver information on your car insurance policy when the drivers in your household change.

But, you could be taking a big risk if you postpone finding medical insurance for yourself and your family.

Take a Bigger Risk If your primary goal is maximizing what you leave behind to your heirs or charity, you have more freedom than most.

Not exact matches

A big business that has a reputation to protect won't take a risk on your small company if it doesn't think you can perform, Boykin says.

While investors will have to find stocks with higher yields, pay more for them and take on more risk in bonds, the biggest change in a permanently low - rate world is that people will need to set aside more of every paycheque if they want to keep the same goal for retirement income.

Many investors have no idea how their portfolios would fare if the equity market took a big hit, according to a risk - tolerance survey FinMason did late last year.

If you believe in yourself, if you believe in what you bring to the table, you believe in your product — take the risk,» Paul Michael Levesque, better known by his ring name Triple H, told CNBC Tuesday, when asked about how budding entrepreneurs should approach the notion of becoming the «next big thing.&raquIf you believe in yourself, if you believe in what you bring to the table, you believe in your product — take the risk,» Paul Michael Levesque, better known by his ring name Triple H, told CNBC Tuesday, when asked about how budding entrepreneurs should approach the notion of becoming the «next big thing.&raquif you believe in what you bring to the table, you believe in your product — take the risk,» Paul Michael Levesque, better known by his ring name Triple H, told CNBC Tuesday, when asked about how budding entrepreneurs should approach the notion of becoming the «next big thing.»

Bill Dudley, who as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York oversees big banks like JPMorgan and Citigroup, says bankers might police risk - taking by employees more aggressively if their compensation came in the form of bonds instead of stock.

Collins pointed out that a big part of UK (and indeed US) election law relates to «declaration of spent», before making the conjoined point that if someone is «hiding that spend» — i.e. by placing dark ads that only the recipient sees, and which can be taken offline immediately after the campaign — it smells like a major risk to the democratic process.

This wouldn't do: if big investors were going to be persuaded to take billions of dollars in catastrophic risk, they would need to feel there was some reason in the pricing of that risk.

You take a big risk with variable interest rates, because if rates rise, your loan rate — and your payments and the total interest you pay — can increase substantially.

«When I hear people talk about banks taking risks, it often sounds as if we are taking big bets like you would at a casino or a racetrack.

«If you don't make some misjudgements, you're doing it wrong: you've not taken enough risk and you'll never score a big one.

I take one example here — A person working at Wall Street runs a big risk if he takes a bet against the market and loses money.

When more than a third of your business is at risk if Australia's biggest supermarket chain takes you off the shelf you can understand why a supplier is reluctant to speak out against Woolworths.

Wenger knows he needs players but there is a bottom line he won't cross because we can not do it financially — sometimes I think he's made a mistake on cheap shots he should have gambled on (should have taken the risk on Wanyama and Alderwereild if you ask me) but generally he's also dodged some HUGE big budget bullets (I remember the huge uproar that we were letting Spurs get Soldado...).

You take that risk at a big club, especially if you are an attacking player.

LvG buys Falcao and he is in the process of re-building (ie re-buying) an empire in a masterly fashion — you can guess the media take if Wenger had bought him — «Le Prof's big risk last - minute panic buy».

I think that Arsenal, has the resources to take a risk to try to win the league next season and go out and get the players that can do that even if it costs big money.

If Wenger does take risk, should risk it on bigger name — not at above average penalty box poacher like Martinez / Higauin or potential young player like Lacazette We have a top squad — the second half run is title wining form — keep the squad intact and injury free is the top priority

For me the only question is whether OG can continue to score at the rate he has this year — frankly I have my doubts because I am naturally pessimistic — but if he can than then I fail to see the point in taking a punt to replace him with a big name that will come with big money and a big risk.

I think Mbappes build makes him a better fit for the EPL than Lacazette, he is big and quick, can head the ball and dribble past players and a composed finisher for his age, wish we take a risk on him even if its 100 million, worst case scenario is he ends up being a better version of Giroud.

If you went on and played in college and took more head balls and sustained two more concussions, you're probably at a little bigger risk.

But I needed to know how big a risk, if any, I would be taking by sleeping on my back.

It seems to me to be a very big difference if somebody who's putting up their own money and taking a big risk and creating wealth and jobs for the economy - well that's fair enough, that's the old British «good luck to them» argument.

«I would think that if we are collaborating with Cote d'Ivoire, collaborating with Nigeria, and other countries within the sub region, our capacity will be bigger and we can take on bigger risks and that will retain our premium payment within the region».

In that brusque question, Adele acknowledged the injustice: If Beyoncé, arguably the world's biggest star, can't win «Album of the Year» with a project this ambitious, artful, visually striking, and socially relevant, it's clear the Recording Academy values art that keeps them comfortable over art that dares to take risks.

It's as if Peploe's adaptation, with the help of Marilyn Goldin, Camille Claudel, The Big Blue) and husband Bernardo Bertolucci (Besieged, Stealing Beauty) always stops short before taking any risks.

Bosses are interesting, and memorable from one to another, also the bosses run away if the take too much damage and will move from location to location make you like a true monster hunter risking your life to take down this big ass monsters.

It's his The Dead Zone, and he's amazing in a movie that takes big risks and pays off in a meaningful way; if he were to star in it now, I think it would be mistaken for camp.

Marvel deserves some credit for bringing Black Panther to the big screen (though it took 18 MCU movies to get to this point, and let's not forget how Disney felt it unnecessary to release action figures for its female superhero), but it's not as if the company was taking a big financial risk.

We take a look at 14 big - budget movies releasing in 2016 to determine how much, if any, financial risk they pose for the studio producing them.

If a teacher is operating in an environment that doesn't welcome risk or learn from failure, then taking that big step toward changing one's practice isn't likely to happen.

You don't want to take too many risks and we have seen on quite a few occasions this year and in the past that if it goes wrong here, it goes wrong big time.»

If you're ready to take the risk that your book won't be a big performer in the publisher's catalog, you won't find a more interesting or exciting business.

The problem is indeed that traditional authors expect to have their book published, get a big advance, and if it doesnâ $ ™ t earn out hard luck for the publisher - they have to take risks.

And even if you could, you need to be willing to finance the necessary inventory — a big enough risk that only previously successful authors would be willing to take.

The Coalition of Independent Authors: Speaking of those risks Mr. Godin talks about, if you've published (whether independently or not) you've taken the biggest one a creative type can.

The problem is indeed that traditional authors expect to have their book published, get a big advance, and if it doesn't earn out hard luck for the publisher - they have to take risks.

If you're willing to take a bigger risk, you may want to invest in individual stocks.

I take one example here — A person working at Wall Street runs a big risk if he takes a bet against the market and loses money.

Taking out a loan in any amount is a big deal since it involves going into debt and risks further damaging your credit score if the loan goes into default.

Think about Donald Trump doing a big business deal to buy a new hotel development... he is carefully weighing the risk and the reward from the deal and deciding if it's worth taking or not.

If you're willing to take on more risk by going for home runs even if it increases the chance that you'll swing and miss, you can reduce your probability of success in exchange for a much bigger payofIf you're willing to take on more risk by going for home runs even if it increases the chance that you'll swing and miss, you can reduce your probability of success in exchange for a much bigger payofif it increases the chance that you'll swing and miss, you can reduce your probability of success in exchange for a much bigger payoff.

You fall into a «downward spiral» of losing money because you feel like you've lost so much to this point that you start to feel like you don't care if you lose anymore, so you start taking bigger risks and trading more frequently, in other words, you're gambling in the markets now.

I can promise you that you will blow out many trading accounts if you don't learn to take profits by setting logical reward scenarios of 2, 3, or 4 times your risk, if you trail your stop you can sometimes pick up 5 times your risk or higher, it all depends on market conditions and whether or not you can deal with letting a 1 to 2 or larger winner turn around and move against you because you were hoping for a bigger reward.