Many teachers, parents and students think that
taking a standardized test designed to measure student learning is not in the interest of student learning.
Too much focus on testing and test prep, narrowing of the curriculum, stressed students, concerned parents, exasperated teachers --- taken together it makes for a combustible mix of anger and frustration that leads many to the regrettable but understandable conclusion that
taking a standardized test designed to measure student learning is not in the interest of student learning.
Not exact matches
You can't throw a rock inside a school without hitting a
standardized test; every time your son or daughter turns around, they are
taking some
test designed by some far away bureaucrat or
testing company.
While ESSA was
designed to reduce unnecessary
standardized testing, the new educational policy requires that schools
take an annual statewide assessment.
As Wendy Lecker explains in her column entitled, «Opting out, parents answer to a higher authority,» the Governor Malloy's Commissioner of Education, Stefan Pryor and the Malloy administration are telling local school superintendents, principals and teachers that they are to instruct parents that their child MUST
take Connecticut's
standardized tests and MUST
take the new poorly
designed and unfair Common Core Smarter Balanced Assessment Field
Test.
Each of these
standardized tests is
designed to
take a minimum of 3.5 hours to complete.