By
taking learner feedback and data into account throughout the design and implementation process, we were able to create courses that were optimized for the specific needs of the CalVCB audience.
Not exact matches
Ask great questions, give great
feedback, and let
learners take the helm.
This makes it imperative that you pay attention to the
feedback received from the
learners taking the course, and address it.
Guidance for
learners, reinforcement of the important learning aspects and key
take - aways, and formative
feedback for
learners (using the mentor)
With a formal corrective
feedback mechanism in place, all of these issues would be addressed appropriately, ensuring that the
learner can then
take remedial action to fully benefit from the instruction.
You can not give the very same
feedback to all of your
learners, without
taking into account their score, their strengths and weaknesses.
In my last post we
took a look at a checklist for designing good gamified eLearning and saw how the story and look and feel that games provide engage
learners on a deeper level; competition, rewards and challenges offer motivation, and
feedback, both positive and negative, helps
learners master information quickly.
Just as important in sitting with
learners before
taking the training, it is also just as important to gain
feedback from those after the training.
Take away: Consider how
learners get
feedback at both the micro and macro levels in your course.
Once you understand these barriers, you'll be able to structure your
feedback so that it's not only clear to the
learner what needs to improve, but also what specific steps they should be
taking and how this will benefit them in the future.
Throughout the whole online training process, it is important to constantly
take eLearning
feedback from your remote
learners.
Also, make sure that
learners can easily access course help and have a way to send
feedback so that you can
take it into consideration for the next course.
Feedback helps focus on how and when your
learners take in new information and gauge interest levels for changing to a different approach.
With the lack of interactivity and instantaneous
feedback, the
learner needs to really want to
take the content — and sadly, that's not always the case.
The aim: to show that formative
feedback, used in a learning cycle which empowers the
learner to
take up responsibility for her / his learning is the way to develop 21st century skills such as critical thinking, learning to learn and digital skills.
Rather than the traditional model, which encourages «teaching the middle» of the room, personalized learning empowers teachers to do what they've always known is right: giving each
learner specific, targeted
feedback and support that meets them at their level,
takes advantage of what they already know and do well and pushes every student to improve in ways that are relevant and achievable for them.
Round Robin reading can highlight an English
learner's miscues because
feedback usually
takes the form of correction
feedback and repair.
All AFL practices carried out by teachers (such as giving
feedback, clarifying criteria, rich questioning) can eventually be «given away» to students so that they
take on these practices to help themselves, and one another, become autonomous
learners.
Learning should
take place in a culture where individuals are expected to be reflective and active
learners, and where there are performance and development processes that provide them with frequent, constructive
feedback and support to improve their leadership.
This approach also does not provide
learners with the detailed
feedback they need to improve their English writing skills, nor does it
take into account that different ELLs can be at the same grade level, but in varying stages of learning English.
Provide a daily workflow of formative assessment, intervention and
feedback to
learners Example: A teacher establishes a transparent system using an online learning management system (LMS) for
learners to
take micro-assessments, receive or seek support based on results, and get direct
feedback from a teacher or peer.